… And Democrats in Congress unanimously gave him that power. Republicans and Democrats in Congress had originally given that power to the Nobel Prize winner, but now that power moves to either President Trump or President Clinton. Indeed, it’s even possible that Secretary of State Chelsea Clinton may receive that power if nominated by her wedding guest President Trump.

In the FAST Act passed in December of 2015, Congress and President Obama empowered the President and his Secretary of State to rescind your passport, by decision power granted solely to the President’s IRS. “If the Secretary receives certification by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that an individual has a seriously delinquent tax debt, the Secretary shall transmit such certification to the Secretary of State for action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of a passport pursuant to section 32101 of the FAST Act.”

Only a few years after discovering the president’s IRS had applied faulty criteria to the tax status of their boss’s opponents, the Republican-controlled Congress granted the Democratic-controlled IRS the authority to judge your tax status. If the judgement is negative, the President’s State department will take away your passport. President Obama gladly accepted the mandate with his signature upon the bill.

The money that will be raised from the threat of revoking passports was used in the Fixing Surface Transaction Act (FAST) to finance a make-work transportation bill.

Never mind that the President and Congress had sworn to uphold the Constitution. Revoking a passport is a penal action — a legal punishment. The Constitution has various provisions that are supposed to ensure a trial by judge and jury. But the FAST Act removes the judgement process from the court and delivers it to the IRS, with enforcement by the State Dept. How could that be Constitutional? Oh well, now the judgement will be up to President Trump or President Clinton. Let’s hope they like you.

How can someone have a tax assessment? I don’t know–ask the IRS. It’s all up to them–it’s not a court proceeding. And you aren’t assumed innocent, either. It’s quite possible that President Trump or President Clinton will make an “error” or might  “use inappropriate criteria”  upon your tax filing.

Wouldn’t you be notified? Well, move someplace without any forwarding addresses. You won’t get the notices.

But you can appeal? Sure. You can FILE SUIT against the government to stop them from rescinding your passport. That is, if you have lots of money.  Oh yeah–a little detail–if you sue, you are the PLAINTIFF and you have to prove the guilt of the DEFENDANT (The U.S. Government is assumed innocent until the citizen proves the government guilty).

There are 8.7 million US expats that have been complaining about this fascist legislation — to no avail. Homelanders have been happy enough with a law to punish people that live outside USA — with dependence upon their passports.

Now it’s time for Homelanders to find out how unconstitutional laws affect them.

Maybe it’s a good idea for homelanders to stay quiet about their opposition to President Trump or President Clinton. When you lose, your political affiliations might be noticed and someone you don’t like will be able to prevent you from leaving your country.

On February 28, 2011, I stood up with dozens of other people and made an oath of fealty to the Queen of Canada. At that moment I ceased being a US citizen because I made my oath with the intention of relinquishing US citizenship. As of yesterday, it has been five years. Rejoice with me. It is a cause of celebration.

It was in February, 2010, that I made the decision to seek Canadian citizenship. I had been eligible to apply for it for years, but it was upon learning about the exit tax on those who renounce US citizenship that I felt compelled. If the USA was going to tax me for exiting with more than 2 million in assets, I’d better quit now before I get that wealthy. I needed the protection of the Canadian government that citizenship could provide–and I did not want to become stateless because of renouncing US citizenship. While I am happy to have become a Canadian citizen, the Canadian government has disappointed through refusal to protect so many citizens whose clinging attachment to the USA remains an impediment to their true happiness. Hence, the fight continues, even if for me it is mostly solved. So my joy in February 28 as special day is really and truly in my having on that date cast away the attachment to the USA. I consider my CLN a Certificate of Manumission. But as can be seen by the timeline, I have to wait until 2018 before I will be free from FBAR.

Timeline

• September, 1986-Moved to Canada to study theology at graduate level
• May, 1989-Married a Canadian
• August, 1991-Moved to Cambridge to do PhD
• December, 1994-Returned to Canada (spouse works while I finish PhD)
• September, 1996-Become a landed immigrant in Canada
• February 25, 2010-Sent application for Canadian Citizenship
• February 28, 2011-Swore an oath to Queen Elisabeth II and relinquished US citizenship
• April 7, 2011-Visited the US Consulate in Toronto to inform them of my relinquishment
• December 10, 2011-Launched the Isaac Brock Society website with five other concerned Canadians
• April 16, 2012-CLN arrived in the mail
• June 15, 2012-Filed 8854 (invoking 5th Amendment)  and 2011 taxes (using TaxAct) to complete filing obligations
• July 29, 2013-An urgent return to Alaska from exile to search for Wally Dunn
• June 15, 2015-Statute of limitation on 1040 (normal audit not counting fraud)
• June 30, 2018-Satute of limitation on FBAR filing requirements

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même merde

Continue reading →

Solving US Citizenship Problems PARIS FRA Sat Mar 5, 11:00-13:00 Comptoir Voltaire / 253, boulevard Voltaire 75011 https://t.co/MBnyBSABM7

— ADSCanadienne (@ADSCanadienne) February 29, 2016

 
PARIS FRA
 

WHEN: Saturday MARCH 5, 2016 11:00 – 13:00 CET

WHERE: Comptoir Voltaire / 253, boulevard Voltaire 75011 Paris / Metro & RER: Nation MAP

ADMISSION: €15 Payable in cash on the door please (to cover costs).
 
 

WHO: John Richardson, B.A., LL.B., J.D. (Of the bars of Ontario, New York and Massachusetts), Toronto citizenship lawyer- citizenshipsolutions.ca and Co-chair of the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty and the Alliance for the Defeat of Citizenship Taxation

Information presented is NOT intended or offered as legal or accounting advice specific to your situation.

cross posted from ADCSovereignty blog

Introducing Jackie Bugnion …

Jackie Bugnion explains the problems of citizenship taxation for #Americansabroad https://t.co/XHBJ2kDbml

— John Richardson – Counsellor for US persons abroad (@ExpatriationLaw) September 13, 2015

Jackie Bugnion has published a superb article describing the problems of U.S. citizenship taxation and why the United States must move to residence based taxation. Before, describing her article, for those who don’t know …

On May 7, 2015 I received notification that Jackie Bugnion had submitted her resignation to the Board of ACA “American Citizens Abroad“. I read the notification with a combination of sadness and total appreciation for the incredible efforts that Jackie has made in advocating for the rights of Americans Abroad. Jackie was largely responsible for organizing the “Citizenship Taxation Conference” (featuring the debate between Michael Kirsch and Bernard Schneider) that took place in Toronto on May 2, 2014. Some of you may have had the privilege of meeting her there. It’s unlikely that she could be replaced by any one individual.

In my humble opinion Jackie has done more than any single individual in both:

1. Helping Americans Abroad in day-to-day practical ways; and
2. Leading the broader educational initiative which I believe will lead to the United States transitioning from CBT to RBT.

Jackie’s notification of her retirement included the comment that:

While the task is far from over, I am pleased to know that ACA has managed to get RBT on the table of tax reform.  As you know the Senate Finance Committee has taken a positive stand on this.  The number of public submissions on tax reform to the Senate Finance Committee in April 2015 showed significant input from Americans abroad.  There were 350 submissions to the “international” group compared to 450 for the “personal” group.  When related to the interested populations – 7 million vs 250 million, this demonstrates a major input from overseas. Congress is sensitive to this level of participation.

Continue reading →

Solving US Citizenship Problems –Munich DE Thurs Mar 3 19:00-21:00 Schwanthalerstr. 80 £15 https://t.co/4m8pMyjbM8 pic.twitter.com/cEqyIYA5pG

— U.S. Expat Canada (@USExpatCanada) February 24, 2016

MUNICH DE

Solving US Citizenship Problems

Interactive discussion; updates on FATCA reporting, CBT lawsuit and other issues

WHO: John Richardson B.A., LL.B, J.D. licensed in Ontario, New York & Massachusetts. Member of ACA Tax Advisory Panel. Toronto citizenship lawyer- citizenshipsolutions.ca and Co-chair of the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty and the Alliance for the Defeat of Citizenship Taxation

WHEN: Thurs, March 3, 2016 19:00 – 21:00

WHERE: Eine WeltHaus München, Schwanthalerstraße 80, 80336 München, Germany MAP

ADMISSION: £15. Payable in cash on the door please (to cover costs).

Information presented is NOT intended or offered as legal or accounting advice specific to your situation.

Solving US Citizenship Problems – London UK Mon Feb 29 18:30–20:30 Russell Sq Tube Stn £15 https://t.co/4m8pMyjbM8 pic.twitter.com/w825LJvAWn

— U.S. Expat Canada (@USExpatCanada) February 24, 2016

LONDON UK
Solving US Citizenship Problems
 
Interactive discussion; updates on FATCA reporting, CBT lawsuit and other issues
 
WHO: John Richardson B.A., LL.B, J.D. licensed in Ontario, New York & Massachusetts. Member of ACA Tax Advisory Panel. Toronto citizenship lawyer- citizenshipsolutions.ca and Co-chair of the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty and the Alliance for the Defeat of Citizenship Taxation

WHEN: Monday, February 29, 2016 18:30 – 20:30

WHERE: University of London International Hall Meeting Room, Landsdowne Terrace, London WC1N 1AS UK – 150m walk
from Russell Square Tube Station MAP

ADMISSION: £15. Payable in cash on the door please (to cover costs).

SWeden pays 73,700 USD per each resident adult US-citizen immigrant to be located with the #FATCA ethnic-identification system. Is Sweden offshore? (I had always thought that Sweden was on the continent of Europe). (Total FATCA implementation costs in Sweden are estimated to be greater than 7.61 billion SEK.)

Would it be at all possible to dispel any myth that residents in USA are sending their money to SWeden to avoid taxation? Has no one in Washington or Stockholm yet realized that SWeden has the highest personal tax rate in the world?

FATCA, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, is an enforcement tool of the requirements of Americans to report their “foreign” bank accounts. Since US has extraterritorial taxation based upon citizenship, these reports are required of all US citizens and all US persons living throughout the world or in Sweden.  “Foreign” and “offshore” are defined as anything that is not in American. Canada is “offshore’ and, Mexico is “offshore”, and the Swedish accounts of a dual citizen living in Sweden are also considered both “offshore” and “foreign” according to the IRS and its captive media. US persons are required to fill out the Foreign Bank Account Report FBAR at the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen). Those that have not filed FBARs are eligible for jail terms, or fines reaching 300% of a persons asset value.  A child is responsible for filing its own FBAR and is not exempted from the penalties.  FBARs are required to be filed electronically at the FinCen website. Additionally, qualified “rich” US persons (those with over $200,000) are required to have also filed IRS form 8938, with an additional penalty structure.

The Swedish government administration stated that the costs of implementation should be considered versus the threatened 30% sanctioned tax which could be applied for non-compliance.

Sweden could not estimate the business effect of FATCA, despite that Swedish law requires that the business impact must be evaluated for legislations. In following discussions, it was estimated that each small financial institute (comprising 95% of the FFI’s) would incur 1 million SEK yearly FATCA administration costs. (Documentation of the costs to larger institutions has not been located.) IRS lists 744 FFI’s to date, yielding a minimum estimated yearly cost of 744 million SEK (excludes the cost of the 5% larger institutions), or 7.44 billion SEK over 10 years. The costs to the Swedish government were estimated to be above 15 million SEK for implementation and 15 million SEK per year thereafter, for a 10 year public cost of 165 million SEK. Total FATCA implementation costs in Sweden are estimated to be greater than 7.61 billion SEK.

As Sweden approaches a cashless society, nearly every resident has a bank account, yet only the 82.9% over 15 yrs old are considered further in this analysis.

With 9,784,445 inhabitants and 17,000 resident U.S. citizens, the Swedish government cost is 777 SEK per capita, 447,700 SEK per resident US-citizen resident and 937 SEK per adult Swedish account, or an astounding 539,984 SEK per adult resident U.S.-person account.

Using the 6-yr average of IRS exchange rates (7.33 SEK/USD), this yields the cost of 73,700 USD to locate each adult resident US-person account.

Would it not have been better for Sweden to just hand over 761 million SEK to USA each year—as a tax for having allowed immigration and emigration with USA?

But, FATCA is about finding rich offshore tax evaders! They are sending their money to Sweden—in order to avoid taxation! Believe it! Believe it! You should be believing all of the FATCA “offshore” media propoganda for Sweden. They are not paying their fair share! We need to get every last PESO out of them!

Who are they actually going to find? The objective is to find all suspected U.S. persons living in Sweden and any suspected Swedes living in USA.

They will find many “real Swedes” have had no control over their Swedish parent’s sexual lust to procreate in America. Thousands of “real Swedes” have studied or worked temporarily in USA, and begat children upon U.S. soil.

They may also find about 51,000 SWedish-citizen schmucks living in The Land of the Free as expats. I suppose that Obama wants to find them, too. There ought to be a few of those pesky buggers with checking accounts back in Du gamla du Fria, due to their devious history of once having lived someplace other than America. They might have inherited something from grandma, have a summer house, or might even be renting out their Swedish family home in their absence. Somehow, these terrible immigrants in America need to be located and punished for their sins.

FATCA looks for “indicia” of these pesky U.S. persons.
Continue reading →

FATCA is the method of identifying suspected U.S. persons, who might be residing outside of USA–working and saving in non-American financial institutions.

As in the analysis of the other countries, one first must ask if we could dispel any myth that there are Americans in America who are sending their money to Australia — in order to avoid taxation.

Australia: The costs in Australia are estimated to be 255 million AUS for implementation, and 22.7 million AUS for each year of maintenance. Over 10 years, this totals 482.68 million AUS. With 77,000 resident US citizens (54% of whom are of dual citizenship) and known population of 24,003,100, the implementation cost is 6,270 AUS per residing U.S. citizen, 11,590 AUS per U.S.-person account, or 20.2 AUS per capita. The most representative developed country has 661 bank accounts per 1000 adults, and Australia has 82.1% population above 15 years old (adults). This yields estimated 41, 700 US-citizen bank customers in Australia, or a FATCA implementation cost of 37.3 AUS per customer.

AS 3668 FFI’s are currently registered, the estimated FATCA cost per FFI is 132,000 AUS per FFI.

The same analysis showed that costs without the IGA 477 million AUS for implementation, and 58.8 million AUS for each year of maintenance. ($1.066 billion AUS total) would have been 44,4 AUS per capita, 81.1 AUS per customer, or 13,800 AUS per resident U.S. citizen, or 25, 600 AUS per U.S.-person account . This is the only published non-IGA country cost estimation identified.

Without an IGA, the estimated FATCA cost per FFI is 291,000 AUS.

If it could have been assumed that one person had only one account, Australia still could only have said to have succeeded to locate only 30,000 of those US citizens (72% effectiveness) in its first FATCA submission to USA.  (updated per commenter) It was determined that each located U.S. citizen bank account averaged 160,000 AUS—hardly those rich 1%’ers.

Australia is paying dearly to identify its minorities for the benefit of an intrusive foreign government.

p.s. Recently, it was pointed out as to where to find foreign-born population in the USA. 84,368 +/-4,780
residents of USA are counted to have been born in Australia as non-US citizen Australians. This quantity is not significant (less than 1%) in the above calculations. Data can be found at

http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_14_1YR_B05006&prodType=table

https://www.census.gov/topics/population/foreign-born/about.html

Note that, indeed, FATCA’s objective is also to locate foreign-born persons residing in USA.  Like US persons living in Australia, Australians living in USA are required to file their FBARs & 8938’s and all of their other tax papers. Many of these persons have inheritances and savings and checking accounts from their former lives and for their current life. Perhaps they have summer houses or inherited family homes or checking accounts for supporting children who are studying in Australia. These persons indeed are due to report their situations to the IRS, yet they are far from “those offshore tax evaders” for which FATCA propoganda is claiming.

482,680,000 / (77,000 + 84,638 ) yields 2986 AUS per the FATCA-indicia objects (US citizens in Australia + Australian-born persons in USA) .