From Dr. von Koppenfels:
[See pdf’s: Univ Kent study brief and US citizenship renunciation Kent study summary]
Dear all,
As promised, here (are) two documents – cut and pasted to go here, so I hope they don’t look too strange with the formatting – that summarize the initial findings of my research from the survey “The US and You”, to which some of you may have responded. Many respondents (thank you!!) took the time to write extensive comments, and I am still working my way through those (400 pages) of data. Producing a more in-depth analysis of that may take some months, but I’ll post that eventually as well.
For now, here the initial results. And thank you to all survey respondents!!
Best,
Amanda
11 February 2015
New Survey Shows US Citizenship Renunciation Intentions Not Linked to Income
BRUSSELS, Belgium (11 February 2015) – Figures released by the US Treasury Department show 3,514 US citizens renounced their citizenship (also includes long-term residents who gave up their residency) in 2014; this is the highest figure ever, up over 2,999 in 2014.
A recent University of Kent (at Brussels) study surveyed 1546 US citizens and former citizens (from 5 December 2014 to 20 January 2015) on this topic. Of the US citizen respondents, 31% have actively thought about renouncing US citizenship and 3% are in the process of doing so. The study shows that, in contrast to what is commonly thought, income is not a key factor in their doing so.
Of those who have renounced or relinquished US citizenship (142 of the total respondents), nearly half (43%) have annual pre-tax household incomes of under $100,000 (USD). There is, similarly, very little difference in renunciation intention between those with lower incomes and those with higher incomes: of US citizen respondents with annual household incomes under $100,000 (USD), 28% are actively thinking of renouncing; of US citizen respondents with incomes above $250,000 (USD), 33% are actively thinking of doing so.
The University of Kent study shows that many overseas Americans are feeling increasingly pressured by US financial reporting requirements and that maintaining US citizenship is costly – in terms of accountants’ fees. One respondent noted: “I can’t pay an accountant 2000€ in order to pay the USA $0.00 in the end.” Fear of “draconian” FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) penalties is also widespread, as this pensioner noted: “Annual income under $4,000; potential FBAR penalties $30,000 per annum for 3 small accounts! I am old and dependent on savings; one paperwork lateness could leave me facing starvation.”
Numerous respondents also noted severe difficulties in retaining or opening investment accounts, bank accounts and, in some cases, securing mortgages, as local banks increasingly refuse US customers – which negatively affects their ability to plan for retirement. Some 39% have lived abroad for over 20 years, and over two-thirds (67%) say they are unlikely to return to the US.
All US citizens living outside of the US are required to comply with both taxation on global income and financial reporting requirements. Certain groups of US citizens and former US citizens feel particularly targeted, as a respondent in Canada explained: “Canada is home to many border babies, born in the US because that was the location of the closest hospital, and ‘accidentals’ like myself who left the US as young children with no say in where they were born.”
This University of Kent survey – the first academic study of its kind, and the largest look at the attitudes of Americans living abroad on this topic to date – shows that income is not the key motivating factor in prompting renunciations, but that increasing reporting requirements, fears of “draconian” penalties and increasing inability to hold a bank account are factors prompting renunciation.
A longer summary of initial findings is available.
———-
Executive Summary:
Survey of Citizenship Renunciation Intentions Among US Citizens AbroadThe US State Department estimates that 6.8 million Americans live outside of the US. The Treasury Department recently released its official numbers on 2014 fourth quarter US citizenship renunciations. In 2013, annual renunciations rose to their highest level ever, at 2,999, and in 2014 rose still higher, to 3,514.
A new research survey of 1546 US citizens and former citizens living outside of the United States shows that 31% of the US citizens are seriously thinking about renouncing their US citizenship, and that 3% are currently in the process of doing so.
The survey ran from 5 December 2014 to 20 January 2015, surveying 1404 US citizens and 142 former citizens, living in 69 countries. The survey was an opt-in snowball survey, distributed initially via overseas American organizations. The survey included closed-ended and open-ended questions, allowing for both quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Initial key findings of the study are:
Quantitative Analysis:
1) 31% have actively thought about renouncing US citizenship and 3% are in the process of doing so; 32% have never thought about renouncing US citizenship. Another 33% have given only a passing thought to the idea, however, they have no immediate or even long-term plans to do so. Many hold strong feelings of American identity and express pride in being US citizens.
2) More than one-third (39%) of all respondents had lived in their current country of residence for 20 years or more. The primary reason (33%) for moving to that country was to be with a spouse or partner, followed by employment (26%). 21% left the US as children. Over half (54%) are aged 50 or older, and 58% are female. 88% have at least a four-year college education. 45% have annual pre-tax household incomes of under $100,000 (USD) and an additional 18% between $100,000 and under $150,000.
3) Of those who have renounced or relinquished US citizenship, nearly half (43%) have annual pre-tax household incomes of under $100,000 (USD). Of those who have renounced or relinquished, more than half (56%) have lived at least 20 years in the United States, and three-quarters (75%) more than 20 years in their current country of residence.
4) Renunciation intentions are not linked to income: 43% of former citizens have annual household incomes under $100,000 (USD). Of US citizens with annual household incomes of more than $250,000, 33% have actively thought of renouncing and 4% are in the process of doing so. This compares to 28% of those US citizens with incomes under $100,000 (USD) having actively thought of doing so, and 3% currently in the process, and to 31% of all US citizen respondents who have actively thought of doing so and 3% who are in the process.
Qualitative Analysis:
5) US citizens who have renounced or relinquished their citizenship, or are thinking about doing so, mention several key factors. They note that financial reporting requirements are increasingly onerous and intrusive, and, second, that they are likely to remain overseas.
6) US citizens living overseas are affected by three sets of financial reporting requirements: first, they must file tax returns on global income – unlike nationals of any other OECD country living abroad; second, they must report all bank accounts with a combined total of $10,000 (USD) or more, or the so-called FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) and, third, they are affected by FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) requirements, a law which came into force 1 July 2014. All three factors play a role in individuals’ thoughts on renunciation:
a. In open-ended responses, analysis shows that it is not payment of taxes which prompts renunciation, but rather primarily costs associated with complying with US filing requirements – particularly FBAR, which many respondents only learned about recently, and the recent FATCA law. These can be as much as $1000 to $5000 per year – as one respondent, with a household income of between $50,000 and under $100,000, put it, “I can’t pay an accountant 2000€ in order to pay the USA $0.00 in the end.” This person, who renounced citizenship, would have had to pay nearly 10% of annual income in such costs: “To maintain tax compliancy with my pension account I was going to have to pay my accountant at least £1500 per year and I only earn £18 to £20,000 per year.” Maintaining US citizenship is costly – in terms of accountants’ fees. There are, moreover, no pre-tax retirement savings options for overseas Americans – unlike their US-based counterparts.
b. FBARs are now e-filed via the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a phrase which riles many. The primary concern, however, over FBAR filing is that of many non-working spouses, as expressed by this woman, who has renounced her US citizenship: “Hated being treated like a criminal and filing FBARs on money earned solely by my UK only husband.” Others speak of stress created in their mixed-nationality marriages, especially those who are home-makers with income-earning non-US spouses, because of US filing requirements.
c. FATCA reporting requirements, also requiring reporting on joint accounts with non-US spouses, have further ramifications: numerous respondents also noted severe difficulties in retaining – or opening – investment accounts, bank accounts and, in some cases, securing mortgages, as banks increasingly refuse US customers. Numerous respondents reported great difficulties and stress in planning for retirement – with investment accounts increasingly closed to them in the countries they live in, as well as in the US (where many investment funds now require a US address).
7) Many respondents offered a “wait and see” response, noting that that if FATCA, in particular, is not changed, they feel that they will be “forced” to renounce US citizenship.
8) Two groups of US citizens and former US citizens feel particularly targeted by US financial reporting requirements, as well as by US citizenship policy, as explained well by this respondent in Canada: “Canada is home to many border babies, born in the US because that was the location of the closest hospital, and ‘Accidentals’ like myself that left the US as young children with no say in where they were born.”
These individuals – or their parents – believed that they no longer held US citizenship, having naturalized or held Canadian citizenship or not been aware of legal changes in US nationality law. Many realized only recently that the US Government still considers them US citizens, often after having been assured by US officials that they were not citizens, as this respondent said: “I was horrified to find out this year that the US is still claiming me as a citizen” – having relinquished US citizenship at the time of naturalizing as a Canadian. This person is not alone. Either not having been aware they were US citizens, or having been assured, many years ago, by Consulate officials that they were not, such individuals now face the cost of filing five years’ tax returns – even if no tax is owed – and potentially a $2350 renunciation fee, which for many is “prohibitively expensive”. They feel caught and targeted by US policy.
9) For many other respondents, a strong sense of anger and feeling of “being targeted” also emerged: “It is not a crime to live abroad and the US should not treat its expat citizens like criminals. I would never consider renouncing my US citizenship if the US treated me respectfully. As it is, I may end up renouncing, and that is a sad situation.” One person who renounced noted “What upsets me the most is the attitude by most US people that everyone outside the US is a tax cheat” and another noted “FATCA treats families like mine as suspected criminals until proven otherwise all because one family member is American who dared to marry abroad.”
10) Many expressed strong pride in being American, noting they would never renounce citizenship. Nonetheless, even some of those who have given no thought to renunciation still note, as this person did, “Folks upset about taxation without representation is what created the US.” A respondent with no intention of renouncing notes that “1. I’m an American. 2. I deeply resent being treated like a tax fraud or a drug lord.” This respondent, also with no intention of renouncing, said: “I find it tragic that many Americans living abroad are finding it necessary to give up their US citizenship based upon primarily taxation and banking problems. I think the IRS has to revise the code.”
11) Another person who has actively thought of renouncing, although does not intend to go through with it, said: “I do think that the mass media representation of this issue neglects to capture how difficult this decision is and how heartbreaking and frustrating it is. It’s like being in a cage.”
12) Many of those who did renounce or relinquish their citizenship expressed the pain of doing so, as this woman did: “It’s a bit like having a mastectomy because giving up my passport was traumatic for me.”
13) A very high degree of stress and even fear was expressed by a number of respondents, as expressed by this person “When I found about FBARs and the penalties involved I was unable to eat and sleep properly for weeks”. Many fear that inadvertent filing errors will wipe out retirement savings.
14) Numerous respondents mentioned their frustration with a lack of political representation of overseas Americans. They noted that they do vote in US federal elections, but also noted a lack of response concerning their concerns. Above all, respondents strongly felt the lack of representation of overseas Americans per se, as these two people did: “Double taxation without representation, without services, but with onerous ‘Orwellian’ compliance” or “I don’t feel that I have any representation within the US, so I might as well start forging links elsewhere.”
15) For many, American pride remains strong and a key factor in not renouncing, despite costs associated with remaining a US citizen (accountants’ fees, no pre-tax retirement savings options). On the other hand, frustration and resentment over US government financial reporting policies emerge strongly as well, even among those who feel they may return to the US at some point in the future.
Dr. Amanda Klekowski von Koppenfels is the Director of the MA in International Migration at the University of Kent in Brussels (www.kent.ac.uk/brussels). She is the author of Migrants or Expatriates? Americans in Europe (2014; Palgrave-Macmillan).
@Amanda,
You should think about asking green card holders either abroad or like me in the US how compliance costs and hassles have affected them also. I personally feel like a bunch of traps were set for me and expect more in the future. This must impact how those overseas view the US as a place to work.
How do you feel about the comments from Robert Stack who said that the accounts of Americans were closed in error. Or that FATCA didn’t change anything and isn’t really a burden. Everything is a myth, I guess including your research.
I participated as well and am so happy that Amanda is conducting this study. Maybe there will even be a positive outcome. Ever hopeful!
There must be more like me. After I walked out of the consulate after renouncing, I skipped down the side walk feeling, “Free at last, Free at last, Thank God Almighty I am Free at Last.”
I participated in the survey. I am pleased with the way it was conducted and believe the results are an accurate reflection of the reasons expats are renouncing US citizenship.
I look forward to Amanda’s more detailed follow up report, but I am very glad that she put out broad brush strokes in a timely manner.
Now for the $ 64,000 question, how the heck do we get those people in US congress to acknowledge the realities expats face and take action to correct this gross injustice? They can no longer pretend like they don’t know what is happening to expats.
The Republican Party is eager to use the study as a way to win elections:
“Dr. Amanda Klekowskivon Koppenfels of University of Kent surveyed 1,546 expats who renounced their citizenship from December 5, 2014 to January 20, 2015. 43% of them have annual pre-tax household incomes of under US$100,000. When will the Democrat Party stop calling all expats “FAT CAT” tax cheats?
Real foreign FAT CAT tax cheats who were clients of HSBC’s controversial Swiss bank have donated as much as $81 million to the charitable foundation run by Hillary Clinton and her family (http://gu.com/p/45kxn/stw). When Hillary runs for President, we will make this is a campaign issue for her.”
https://www.facebook.com/republicansoverseas/posts/349576808559454
@Amanda
Thank you. I mentioned your survey in a talk I gave today. Tax evasion is a big topic after the HSBC revelations.
@Neill
True, greencard holders have problems. I wouldn’t say that Amanda’s not covering them makes her research a myth. She can only do so much at once and getting a survey out to greencard holders would be harder (are there greencard holder organizations? Organizations of would-be green card holders?).
@Publius,
The myth of FATCA problems comes from Robert Stack. I don’t think it’s a myth and I didn’t want to say the research was either. I was just saying that the things she pointed out in the research are things the government labelled as myths.
Wonderful that the “fat cat” myth is being debunked. Maybe that piece of ugly propaganda can be laid to rest?
@Bublebustin It is interesting that the politicians called FATCA the way it is. It sounds like FAT CAT as in those FATCAT politicians out to double tax US persons overseas and inflict Orwellian compliance complexity on them.
I have not read it all yet note this: Renunciation intentions are not linked to income, Then therefore, not linked to tax as tax would be a function of income – the higher the income the more likely to renounce.
However, I do know of relatively poor US persons who could never afford renunciation (don’t have the spare say $20K to become 5 years compliant etc.), then therefore for these renunciation intent is very much income related – maybe this group are less likely have computers to complete the survey or report to FinCEN which requires computer reporting. Or, they are less likely to “be in the know.” ?
For my 2nd paragraph: don’t have the spare $20K. Does this describe something like 50%-75% of the population?
If Obama and the rest of the US government can still sit there with their fingers in their ears humming while we try to tell them and provide proof that this is destroying lives all over the world, then the US government has lost ALL humanitarian and moral values period.
@ JC
Good point. I’ve read that 26% of Americans (in America) have no emergency fund whatsoever. I don’t know how that projects into the big wide world outside the U.S.A. though. On the plus side for Americans, they are reducing their personal debt whereas Canadians are are not paying heed and continue to borrow like there’s no tomorrow. Here, there or anywhere a $20K price tag is an insurmountable number for a lot of people. So absolutely, income plays a big factor in renunciation but you have to look at the low income side of the scale to see it. If you don’t have the cash, you can’t make the dash (away from U.S. tax tyranny, along the renunciation route).
Amanda — thanks for the good work. I wonder what your opinion is of citizen-based taxation? Shouldn’t the US go to residency-based taxation? Isn’t that the only reasonable option here? Why hasn’t Democrats Abroad, of which you are a country’s vice-chair, even mentioned residency-based taxation in their platform?
What people unaware of our debates must realize is that FATCA has forced (is forcing) people into compliance, including people of low means who cannot pay. They are forced into compliance because otherwise they can no longer have a bank account, because those banks who do keep their US customers will report them to the IRS (via the local gov’t if there is an intergovernmental agreement). Those who live abroad and have no US indicia could fly under the radar. Especially if they never plan to travel to the US. Those with US birthplaces cannot hide, however. This situation is absurd because most people don’t end up owing US tax. Those that do don’t owe much. As for the more privileged, they may get hit hard, but many of them are also well informed and have planned ahead. And they can afford to have their taxes done and the renunciation fee. And real criminals, of course, have long since been using non-US persons to hold their accounts. Easy. And of course to make things worse, those that have jumped into the IRS programs have been treated worse of all. Both by the IRS and the compliance industry.
Jack: FATCA is also forcing those with US indicia to put assets in the names of spouses, partners and others including children without US indicia. Those who were unfortunate to be born in the USA vs those that are naturalized or born to a US Person parent overseas (so no US place of birth). Obama and the administration close their eyes, fingers in their ears and hum…and ignore all of the evidence before them.
Many thanks to Amanda for giving articulate voice to our inchoate rage. This is an incredibly valuable study.
Just the sheer number of different people all saying the same thing has got to make an impression on any even slightly caring lawmakers, if such exist. Even if not, well, at least they cannot claim they were not told the facts when someday they notice the diaspora has disappeared.
@Jack
You forgot to mention the other problems faced by expats to include the US not recognizing tax-deferred non-US retirement accounts, PFIC rules for non-US mutual funds, CFC rules for non-US small businesses.
Such rules make it impossible for many expats to plan for retirement or own small businesses — thus destroying any vestiges of the unalienable right of the “pursuit of happiness.”
But you are clearly right about one thing — the ONLY solution is RBT. Anything less than that, is tyranny.
The likelihood of a switch to RBT seems to be extremely slim. It would require a Republican controlled Congress, a Republican president, and the will to push through legislation that will be cast by the Democrats as benefiting fat cat billionaires sipping Pina Coladas on exotic beaches.
IMO, the only viable solution for the near and likely far term is renunciation.
@Walter The inalienable rights may only be secured through legal action.
@tdott
I am in the process of doing just that.
@JC
Or by the barrel of a gun, which is what Americas founders had to do.
The timing could not be better for this report. One look at the report and the spike in renunciations over the last couple of years, you can’t deny that something’s afoul.
I am very pleased that I participated in this survey and I am certainly not surprised by its findings. I thought it was very well presented and I am grateful to Dr. Klekowski von Koppenfels and her team for organizing.
With regard to the relationship between income and renunciation having been found to be non-existent, I took this to mean that people do not appear to be *deciding* to renounce because they have a lot of money. I don’t recall any question in the online portion about whether one’s decision *not* to renounce was based on *not* having a lot of money. I did bring it up in my telephone interview however.
Good point MuzzledNoMore. The survey results do nothing for the argument that the increase in renunciation fee creates a barrier to renouncing for many.
Maybe that could be the subject of another survey – how the cost of certifying 5 years of taxes and the renunciation fee is affecting renunciation rates.
One could imagine 2 extreme situations in terms of personal wealth.
On one hand, a low-income person with some local retirement plans and no links to the US, and no US income. The threat of sanctions, plus annual accounting fees, and lots of stress attempting to comply now; might not be worth keeping the passport.
On the other hand, a more financially sophisticated type, relatively high income earner, say twice the FEIE, with some US wealth and ties, has planned properly for the past years, being well advised by a private banker, so as to have no liabilities; all is in order. Just a high income already taxed where they live, so that the tax credit means no additional US taxes, doesn’t even need the FEIE. The yearly 500 euros of accounting is barely a sting, and this person would need to do the accounting anyway even without FATCA.
Of the two, it’s obvious the first person has more incentive to renounce than the second one.
Hence the absurdity of a law for Fat Cats which slams the little people. Many of which are (were) Democrats, but that’s another story.