The IRS uses the threat of severe FBAR penalties to frighten taxpayers into the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure initiatives (OVDI). Thanks to a document uncovered by Showdown, we now know that the IRS is bluffing. This is an example of bad faith.
In the 2011 OVDI FAQ, the IRS gives the most substantial reasons that a taxpayer should enter the program:
Q3. Why should I make a voluntary disclosure?
A3. Taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts or entities should make a voluntary disclosure because it enables them to become compliant, avoid substantial civil penalties and generally eliminate the risk of criminal prosecution. Making a voluntary disclosure also provides the opportunity to calculate, with a reasonable degree of certainty, the total cost of resolving all offshore tax issues. Taxpayers who do not submit a voluntary disclosure run the risk of detection by the IRS and the imposition of substantial penalties, including the fraud penalty and foreign information return penalties, and an increased risk of criminal prosecution.
Later, in the same FAQ, they explain what the possible penalties are:
Q12. How does the penalty framework work? Can you give us an example?
A12. Assume the taxpayer has the following amounts in a foreign account over a period of six years. Although the amount on deposit may have been in the account for many years, it is assumed for purposes of the example that it is not unreported income in 2003.
Year
Amount on Deposit
Interest Income
Account Balance
2003
$1,000,000
$50,000
$1,050,000
2004
$50,000
$1,100,000
2005
$50,000
$1,150,000
2006
$50,000
$1,200,000
2007
$50,000
$1,250,000
2008
$50,000
$1,300,000
(NOTE: This example does not provide for compounded interest, and assumes the taxpayer is in the 35-percent tax bracket, files a return but does not include the foreign account or the interest income on the return, and the maximum applicable penalties are imposed.)
If the taxpayer comes forward and has their voluntary disclosure accepted by the IRS, they face this potential scenario:
They would pay $386,000 plus interest. This includes:
Tax of $105,000 (six years at $17,500) plus interest, An accuracy-related penalty of $21,000 (i.e., $105,000 x 20%), and An additional penalty, in lieu of the FBAR and other potential penalties that may apply, of $260,000 (i.e., $1,300,000 x 20%).If the taxpayer didn’t come forward and the IRS discovered their offshore activities, they face up to $2,306,000 in tax, accuracy-related penalty, and FBAR penalty. The taxpayer would also be liable for interest and possibly additional penalties, and an examination could lead to criminal prosecution.
The civil liabilities potentially include:
The tax and accuracy-related penalty, plus interest, as described above, FBAR penalties totaling up to $2,175,000 for willful failures to file complete and correct FBARs (2003- $100,000, 2004 – $100,000, 2005 – $100,000, 2006 – $600,000, 2007 – $625,000 and 2008 – $650,000), The potential of having the fraud penalty (75 percent) apply, and The potential of substantial additional information return penalties if the foreign account or assets is held through a foreign entity such as a trust or corporation and required information returns were not filed.Note that if the foreign activity started more than six years ago, the Service may also have the right to examine additional years.
In this very frightful example, the IRS makes absolutely no distinction between account holders: The full-blown penalty could apply to anyone with an account adding up to $1,000,000. Moreover, this penalty could greatly exceed the funds that are in the account. The FBAR penalties alone are $2.175 million for an account with only 1.3 million in it.
Let’s say you are an ordinary Canadian resident or even an ordinary US resident. You have your offshore account with a million dollars in it, like they say. But let’s imagine that this money is yours, and that you earned it through legitimate business and it is not drug money or derived from any other criminal venture. What are your chances of receiving this extortionate FBAR penalty? Zero. That’s right. There is zero chance that the IRS will apply this level of penalty to your case. Why? Because the IRS knows about the Eighth Amendment. Showdown referred in a comment to an IRS document (p. 80-81) which says (emphasis mine):
Even before Congress increased FBAR penalties in 2004, the IRS published tiered penalty mitigation guidelines in the internal revenue Manual (IRM), directing examiners to apply less than the statutory maximums. In 2008 the IRS updated these guidelines, explaining that the maximum FBAR penalty amounts can “greatly exceed an amount that would be appropriate in view of the violation.” It required examiners to apply even lesser penalties or a warning letter in lieu of penalties in many cases. It explained that applying multiple FBAR penalties is to be “considered only in the most egregious cases.” Because the statute only specifies “maximum” FBAR penalty amounts that the IRS “may” impose, it would be inconsistent with the statute for the IRS to assert the maximum penalty amounts in every case. Some have gone so far as to suggest that in the absence of these taxpayer-favorable IRM provisions, the FBAR penalties can be so disproportionate as to violate the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thus, examiners have long been required (under “existing statutes,” as implemented by the IRM) to assert FBAR penalties of significantly less than the statutory maximums in all but the most egregious cases.
It seems unlikely, if the money is legitimate, that the IRS would charge a penalty at all. If taxes are owed, perhaps a small FBAR penalty. But in case the penalty is confiscatory, the IRS is well aware that the Eighth Amendment protects the taxpayer. I will soon post some more about the Eighth Amendment, but it is sufficient at this point to say that fines must be proportionate to the crime and to the damage done to the government, and if the tax code already applies fines and interest against unpaid taxes, it seems unlikely to me that the IRS would risk applying any FBAR fine to foreign accounts because the Supreme Court could possibly strike down the entire FBAR law as unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.
In other words, the IRS is bluffing about the maximum penalties. Unless you are crook, they will be afraid to apply it to you. Thus, the IRS threatens the maximum penalty in bad faith, having the intention of scaring people into the Overseas Voluntary Disclosure programs wherein the taxpayer agrees to what seems to be a more reasonable fine of 20, 25, or 27.5%–when in fact, outside of the OVDI, the IRS would be afraid, in my opinion, to apply even such “reasonable” fines to law abiding citizens who have some minor tax irregularities.









@Steven,
First, I want to thank you for your educational inputs on US tax law and how the tax issue litigation works in the court. It may help me to prepare to “DIY ”
I am not Jack and Jill type, but I joined OVDI after learning the fact of my own non-compliance, with a hope doing it right. I was willing to pay penalty on my own errors/mistakes even include the in lieu penalty.
However, after so many flip/flop on RRSP ruling inside OVDI, I have to agree with Just Me/Moby and I have to be suspicious on your claim of those “smartest/finest/ folks” in IRS.
Is that so hard for those smartest/finest folks to tell the difference between government registered retirement plan from other tax non-compliance assets ? Why can’t they simply set up a ruling on this very simple and very common assets among Canadians living inside US ?
I have no doubts — they are super intelligent — and then based on the facts — I have to conclude that they are money driven minded and they have very simple agenda — that is to get as much as they can from taxpayers who make innocent mistakes on certain filing requirement that is so subtle that most professional taxpayers were not aware of. They use fear mongering tactics, they mislead taxpayers with maximum penalty.
Moby, who never claimed being into finest school, did reveal the truth of this subtlety by using google trends to search all these IRS required filing documents.
Do you know how public have been aware of these 4 forms ?
IRS form 1040, TD F 90-22.1, Schedule M, and IRS form 8891
f1040 has been known since early years (make sense as people file every year)
TD F 90-22.1 is unknown before middle of 2009 (that is the fact — until the OVDI/OVDP started)
Schedule M is known in 2009 and 2010 (this form is only for these two years, it was directly related to form 1040, so it was easy to be found)
f8891 is unknown (even today)
See reference,
http://ijdad.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/reasonable-cause-of-failure-to-report/
So those smartest/finest folks know those facts — and they take advantage of taxpayers’ fear — most immigrants are fearful and in shock !
@Steven: I agree negative stereotyping is bad. Very few US citizens and former US citizens living outside the US are “tax cheats” “tax evaders” or “traitors.”
To be labeled and pursued as such by well-educated, moral officials is immoral, offensive and distressing to responsible, law-abiding people everywhere. It achieves nothing except alienating individuals who could be their allies and ambassadors abroad.
@Steven..
You know, at this stage it doesn’t matter why, the IRS has a serious branding problem now. You can call it negative stereotyping if you like, but there are many good explanations on how they got here. Like any maligned brand, now the IRS has to start thinking in commercial terms and come up with proactive ways to repair it. It won’t be easy. The Edsel never made a comeback, and it took a ton of work for Coke to undo its classic coke fiasco. Netflix is struggling with these issues right now. Customers leave, and you may never get them back!
This will take a lot is more than just a marketing or PR campaign. It will take more than just some new guidelines buried at IRS.gov somewhere as a footnote. The TAS has been pointing that out how the IRS has been shooting itself in the foot and destroying its credibility. It is time they start listening. Maybe they are, and we have yet to see signs of it. We will keep watching with intense interest.
@JustMe: IRS is planning to spend $15 million on Public Relations, according to an article OMG posted last week. They think that will fix the problem.
Now we know why they are so desperate to get their hands on our money. That and their trillions of dollars of debt, of course!
Yes, I saw that article. Thought it was an Onion story at first.
https://twitter.com/#!/FBAR_Compliant/status/170967285207539713
Reblogged this on Renounce U.S. Citizenship – Be Free.
Pingback: U.S. citizenship as a disabilty – How much longer will other countries allow U.S. citizens to immigrate? « Renounce U.S. Citizenship – Be Free
I have a very large OVDI induced headache. We have recently contacted TAS and are waiting for the IRS’s response to our OVDI submission. The nice lady at TAS said we may be able to eliminate our penalty on our cap gain on the sale of our home through the first time penalty abatement. Our highest FBAR year was the same year as the house sale. Anyone have any info on this penalty abatement? Also my MP John Weston who is the Feds point man on the dual situation gave us some hope that we may not have to pay the cap gain under article XXV of the treaty. Our lawyer says not true. I asked TAS if their legal would investigate this. Another qualified opinion on this would be greatly appreciated!
Re: Capital gain on the sale of house in Canada –
See #7 at http://www.moodystax.com/blog/33-us-taxation-services/170-us-citizens-resident-in-canada-common-circumstances-where-us-tax-may-be-payable.html
This is only one of the twelve mismatches!
@Bubblebustin
Headache indeed. I don’t have an answer for you. However, if you don’t get a response here, another place you could ask your question might be over at the Jacks Blog…
This thread regarding Opt Outs is getting a lot of comments now, so I would probably ask there…
Would also encourage you to read it and the thread prior to it on Opting Out. You might want to give that some consideration.
http://federaltaxcrimes.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/opting-out-2-3212.html
Pingback: FBAR and the constitution: The Fifth Amendment « Renounce U.S. Citizenship – Be Free
Pingback: The Isaac Brock Society - Expenses and Contributions as of June 16 (our first seven months)
Pingback: The Isaac Brock Society - Steven J. Mopsick comments on IRS new filling procedure for Americans abroad: Too little but not too late
Pingback: The Isaac Brock Society - 2,158 Koreans gave up U.S. green cards or citizenship in 2011, says South Korean government report
Just posting this for what it is worth:
http://mopsicktaxlaw.blogspot.ca/2012/09/aba-taxation-section-vents-about-ovdi.html
“This
past weekend, the powerful and influential Taxation Section of the
American Bar Association met in Boston and to no one’s surprise, the
offshore voluntary disclosure initiative was a front and center focus
which practitioners used to voice concern over the issues we have been
talking about in these pages for month…..”……
Blog entry goes on to focus mainly on the experiences of whales, and not minnows.