Buried in an ostensible jobs bill signed by President Obama last year is a little-noticed job-destroying government regulation that threatens to trigger a massive outflow of capital from the American economy.
The US economy is in bad shape. Many want the federal government to fix it — to end the deficits, create jobs and get America back onto the track of growth and stability. President Obama came to Washington with great promises: to restore international respect for the United States and to bring back the jobs. When signing the HIRE Act of 2010 on March 18, 2010, President Obama said:
A consensus is forming that, partly because of the necessary — and often unpopular — measures we took over the past year, our economy is now growing again and we may soon be adding jobs instead of losing them. The jobs bill I’m signing today is intended to help accelerate that process.
Now the HIRE Act of 2010 contains a time bomb called FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act), which has indeed accelerated a process. Unfortunately that process is not job generation but job destruction caused by an exodus of capital from the United States. Investment means jobs; a departure of investment capital means job losses. Thus, the HIRE Act is really the “FIRE Act”.
The Background of FATCA and FBAR
FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) is the brood of FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report). FBAR requires that US persons divulge foreign accounts to the Treasury Department, but few knew about or ever complied with it (see When Government turns Predator). To stanch the bleeding of US capital into secret bank jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands and Switzerland, Congress introduced FATCA into law as part of the HIRE Act. FATCA requires that Foreign Financial Institutions (FFIs) reveal the accounts of US persons to the IRS. The FFIs will then have to collect tax withholdings for the IRS from these clients. If by January 1, 2014 the FFI is unwilling to reveal their US clients’ accounts, the IRS will impose a punitive 30% withholding on all payments to the FFIs, on dividends, interest and gross sales of stocks, bonds, and financial derivatives.
A sample transaction
Let’s suppose a foreign investor trades stocks on a US exchange, but his broker is FATCA non-compliant. One day he buys 10,000 shares of XYZ at $25 per share, and the next day, he takes advantage of a nice uptick of $1.00 in XYZ and sells at $26 per share. He makes a tidy profit of $10,000. But because his broker is non-compliant, the IRS now withholds 30%, not of the profit but of the gross proceeds of the sale! So the client now receives the sum of $260,000 minus 30%. The foreign investor is unhappy because his $250,000 investment has become $182,000. If he wants his money back, he must file a US tax return.
No investor would accept such conditions. Hence, an FFI must either comply with the invasive regulations of FATCA or simply abandon the US markets.
Are FFIs likely or unlikely to comply with FATCA?
After some study, FFIs have warned that the costs of FATCA compliance will be in the hundreds of millions and likely in excess of whatever taxes that the IRS could gather through its enforcement (not that the IRS cares about that!). It is likely many FFIs will simply choose to leave the United States, taking their clients’ money with them. In an open letter, “Farewell America,” Wegelin & Co., a private Swiss bank, cited their reasons for leaving the United States: excessive regulations, tax issues, and above all, the insolvency of US government. Now add the expense of FATCA, and many other FFIs are going to follow Wegelin’s lead. American Citizens Abroad has cited Japanese and European FFIs as indicating a strong likelihood that they would pull out of the United States.
FFIs could also face privacy lawsuits from affected customers. Canada’s privacy laws, for example, may not permit banks to divulge clients’ account information, for compliance is voluntary. Thus, Canada and several other countries would probably require a change in their privacy laws before their FFIs could lawfully comply with FATCA.
The Unintended Consequences of FATCA
(1) FATCA is causing resentment amongst US allies.
FATCA’s enforcement of US tax globally has resulted in serious alarm and backlash. FATCA is a clear violation of President Obama’s campaign promise on July 2007:
To renew American leadership in the world, I intend to rebuild the alliances, partnerships, and institutions necessary to confront common threats and enhance common security. Needed reform of these alliances and institutions will not come by bullying other countries to ratify changes we hatch in isolation. It will come when we convince other governments and peoples that they, too, have a stake in effective partnerships.
FATCA is an attempt to impose unilaterally the collection of US taxes without consideration of the laws and the rights of sovereign nations, and that makes it bullying of the worst kind. In response, some FFI’s are already turning away US citizens and closing their existing accounts; their business is not worth the hassle anymore.
(2) FATCA is causing resentment amongst US citizens abroad.
US citizens abroad, numbering about six million, would normally be America’s good-will ambassadors. But they have become angry because of the threat of excessive FBAR penalties. Those who thought they could ignore FBAR now dread FATCA, which will force their FFIs to tattle on them. An increasing number of Americans are renouncing their US citizenship. The US consulates have had so many requests for renunciation that they have started arranging group sessions, like the one at the US Consulate in Toronto in October. Moreover, some Americans abroad have pulled all of their investments out of the United States and are also planning their vacations to non-US destinations, not from anger alone but also from fear that border guards will arrest them and that a computer system will soon link the IRS to border enforcement.
(3) FATCA will result in a massive flight of foreign investment capital.
Richard W. Rahn writes in the Washington Post that FATCA has already sent foreign capital fleeing. He claims that the people running Washington are “mental midgets” unaware of how their policies affect the economy. He estimates that FATCA will cause the departure of an estimated $14 trillion of private foreign investment, destroying as many as 10,000,000 jobs in the United States.
By signing the HIRE Act with its FATCA provisions, President Obama has bullied our allies, penalized FFIs, alienated many American citizens and seriously jeopardized any possibility of an economic recovery. Apparently, Mr. Obama’s ideological predisposition in favor of taxes and against wealth blinds him to a balanced approach to the economy and its problems. FATCA’s imposition on FFIs is hegemony of the worst kind. Foreign investors are interpreting FATCA as a sign of the desperation that often precedes the imposition of capital and currency controls. In an investment climate now dominated by fear, capital flight is inevitable. FATCA only ensures its arrival and it will exaggerate its effects.
American Citizens Abroad reaches the following conclusions regarding the legislation:
FATCA legislation is predicated on the faulty assumption that foreigners throughout the world with no predisposition to favor the U.S. will react positively to its attempts to convert them into unpaid IRS agents. Faced with similar investment and personnel options without the legal jeopardy and financial risks, reasonable people will choose non-U.S. alternatives. FATCA implementation will constitute a major disruption of the entire international financial world as we know it today. Reasonable persons and entities will develop effective antibodies to this perceived infection, in ways too numerous and manifold to predict. What can be predicted is that the cumulative effect of this legislation will be a major blow to U.S. economic interests and prestige. At stake for the United States is the potential loss of trillions of dollars of investment, the opportunity for American companies and financial institutions to compete in a competitive global environment and the possibility for American citizens residing overseas to survive and thrive. In brief, the economic future of the United States.
In a time when government has caused what may be irreparable economic problems, we don’t need “help” like this. Mr. Obama, please stop helping us.
Peter W. Dunn blogs at the Righteous Investor
NB: The above article appeared in the American Thinker. I want to thank Monty Pelerin for his many helpful suggestions to improve this article. Petros