Calls for Repeal of FATCA as Part of Tax Reform Framework
ACA: “FATCA is bad law on all fronts and should be repealed.”
April 5, 2013
Washington, DC
In an April 4, 2012, submission to the leadership of the International Tax Reform Working Group and the Financial Services Tax Reform Working Group of the Committee on Ways and Means of the U.S. House of Representatives,American Citizens Abroad (ACA) – the flagship association representing the interests of some seven million Americans residing outside the United States – has again called for repeal of FATCA (“the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act”) as part of a comprehensive overhaul of the U.S. tax system. While focusing on the particular damage FATCA does to U.S. citizens living abroad, ACA pulls no punches in spelling out the broader harm this 2010 law (now pending implementation) threatens to inflict on the American economy as a whole, while failing in its stated purpose of curbing offshore tax evasion.
Special attention should be paid to the international consequences of the U.S. Treasury Department’s attempts to implement FATCA via “intergovernmental agreements” (IGAs), which are nowhere mentioned in the law and have not been authorized by Congress. IGAs threaten to compound the harm inflicted by this misguided legislation by repatriating FATCA’s costs on U.S. domestic institutions (and American consumers) under an unwise, unworkable, and unbalanced attempt at “reciprocity” with foreign governments:
“Foreign governments worldwide are furious that the U.S. Congress has the arrogance to exercise financial imperialism, to unilaterally impose its laws on the rest of the world, to require foreign financial institutions to spend tens of billions of dollars to comply with U.S. law and to require FFIs to break privacy laws in their own country in order to comply with FATCA, exclusively for the benefit of the United States, with no reciprocity, let alone any prior negotiation.
Since FATCA has proved unworkable as legislated, the Department of the Treasury has been obliged to negotiate IGAs with foreign governments to circumvent the privacy issue and to introduce a limited form of reciprocity, but resentment abroad remains great. There will be a backlash and immediate consequences. The reciprocity agreements in the IGAs create a major burden for U.S. financial institutions now required to filter out by nationality all accounts owned by foreign residents and to report on those accounts to the respective governments.”
RepealFATCA.com applauds ACA’s position and calls on other impacted interests to engage directly in achieving FATCA’s repeal before the worst aspects of this misguided law go into effect. The time to get behind the repeal push is now!
James George Jatras
+1.202.375.1007
Visit www.RepealFATCA.com for more information on “the worst law most Americans have never heard of”
The full ACA text follows:
+++++
Source: http://americansabroad.org/files/1813/6500/6764/fatcasubmission.pdf
AMERICAN CITIZENS ABROAD
THE VOICE OF AMERICANS OVERSEAS
Subject: Comments – International Tax Reform Working Group and Financial Services Tax Reform
Working Group, Ways and Means Committee
Attention: Representative Devin Nunes and Representative Earl Blumenauer
Representative Adrian Smith and Representative John Larson
Concerns: Recommendation to repeal FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act)
April 4, 2013
American Citizens Abroad (ACA) was one of the first organizations to call for the repeal of FATCA soon after passage of the law in 2010 and maintains its recommendation that Congress should repeal FATCA within the framework of tax reform seeking an efficient, fair tax system. It is evident from the perspective overseas that:
- FATCA will not achieve its purpose of tracking down tax evaders;
- FATCA is destroying the community of seven million Americans abroad;
- FATCA creates serious damage to the United States and its economy.
FATCA will not achieve its purpose
FATCA is 1984 in the world of George Orwell. Big brother will have access to all personal information, disregarding personal privacy and risk of identity theft. But big loopholes are already apparent. FATCA will lead to a two-tier banking system worldwide – those countries which adhere to FATCA and those which refuse. Russia has already refused and rumour is that the Chinese will also either refuse outright or find an indirect path to circumvent FATCA reporting requirements. The position of other Asian countries, Middle East countries and Latin American countries is not yet known.
The costs of implementing FATCA are absolutely disproportionate to the expected additional tax revenue. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates additional tax revenue of only about $750 million a year for ten years. Compliance, however, of foreign financial institutions (FFI) will cost tens of billions of dollars and U.S. financial institutions face similar costs due to administrative requirements on payments and the reciprocity measures introduced in the Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA). FATCA has already engendered enormous cost for the IRS and Treasury Department through the hundreds of thousands of hours spent by top tax specialists devoted to drafting regulations and negotiating with foreign governments. How many more millions will be required for the IRS to administer and analyze the mass of information flows scheduled to begin in 2014? Congress has never subjected FATCA to a cost/benefit analysis.
The IRS does not need FATCA to pursue tax evaders. Even prior to the passage of FATCA, the IRS had a whole basket of tools, including the QI program, the John Doe summons, Tax Information Exchange Agreements, Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties, the Swift Agreement and the whistleblower program. Furthermore, the IRS Overseas Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) has already brought in over $5 billion in just four years. The OVDP requires participating taxpayers to provide all information on international networks facilitating tax evasion. Consequently, the IRS now has a vast data base to mine for efficient law enforcement, whereas FATCA requires the IRS to look for a needle in a haystack of a massive amount of irrelevant, disparate data, costly to administer and inappropriate for effective law enforcement.
FATCA is destroying the community of seven million Americans abroad
American citizens have become pariahs in the international financial community because of FATCA. The cost of administering FATCA and the perceived legal threats are so high that FFIs prefer not to retain or take on American clients, who represent only a tiny fraction of their total clientele. ACA has received multiple testimonies of Americans residing overseas who have had bank accounts in their country of residence closed, who have been denied entry into foreign pension plans and insurance contracts, who have had mortgages cancelled, who have been pushed off of joint-bank accounts held with foreign spouses, who have lost access to credit cards and who have been forced into a cash economy.
A few major financial institutions may still allow cash accounts, but certainly no investment accounts. PFIC reporting rules exclude investment in foreign mutual funds. Only the few wealthy with financial assets in excess of $1 million have access to SEC registered subsidiaries of foreign banks for investment purposes. In addition, U.S. financial institutions refuse to take on American clients with a foreign address because of the Patriot Act. The average American abroad is shut off from all avenues for personal investment.
In this environment, it is difficult and complicated for Americans to move overseas, establish normal banking relationships required for modern life and gain international experience.
Business opportunities for Americans overseas are blocked. Foreign partners no longer accept Americans in new ventures because FATCA requires reporting to the IRS of any U.S. person owning 10% or more of an unlisted foreign corporation or partnership. Some American-owned businesses overseas have closed down because of lack of access to banking facilities.
FATCA automatically categorizes any American abroad as suspect and ostensibly discriminates against Americans abroad.Americans overseas must report their foreign financial assets on Form 8938 with their 1040 under threat of heavy penalty for non-reporting, but in the eyes of Americans abroad, these assets are local, not foreign. Americans residing in the United States have no such comparable reporting on their U.S.-based assets.
FATCA is contrary to the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, to which the United States is a signatory, as it forces FFIs to discriminate against Americans on the basis of their citizenship.
The rapid rise in renunciations of U.S. citizenship over the last four years is directly linked to FATCA. U.S. policy has indeed gone astray when it forces its own citizens to renounce their U.S. nationality, particularly at a time when the U.S. needs to reinforce its competitive position in the global economy.
To eliminate FATCA’s serious collateral damage on Americans abroad, the United States must adopt residence-based taxation, which would de facto eliminate applicability of FATCA to Americans residing overseas. American Citizens Abroad has submitted to the International Tax Reform Working Group of the Ways and Means Committee a detailed proposal for transition to residence-based-taxation for individuals.
FATCA creates serious damage to the United States and its economy
Foreign governments worldwide are furious that the U.S. Congress has the arrogance to exercise financial imperialism, to unilaterally impose its laws on the rest of the world, to require foreign financial institutions to spend tens of billions of dollars to comply with U.S. law and to require FFIs to break privacy laws in their own country in order to comply with FATCA, exclusively for the benefit of the United States, with no reciprocity, let alone any prior negotiation. Since FATCA has proved unworkable as legislated, the Department of the Treasury has been obliged to negotiate IGAs with foreign governments to circumvent the privacy issue and to introduce a limited form of reciprocity, but resentment abroad remains great. There will be a backlash and immediate consequences. The reciprocity agreements in the IGAs create a major burden for U.S. financial institutions now required to filter out by nationality all accounts owned by foreign residents and to report on those accounts to the respective governments.
An immediate impact of FATCA is a serious reconsideration by foreigners of the risks and dangers of investing in the United States. Foreign insurance companies have already pulled back. Private bankers are advising their foreign clients to reduce U.S. investments, if not totally divest. Foreign investment groups that had been providing fresh capital to small and medium-sized U.S corporations have stopped this activity. Latin American money is retreating from U.S. banks. The threat of FATCA confiscatory 30% withholding tax not only on all U.S. source fixed or determinable annual or periodical gains, profits, and income (FDAP income) but also on the sale value of U.S. assets creates great uncertainty and reserve among foreign investors.
FATCA creates a new barrier to U.S. exports. The President’s Export Commission has recognized that the major export potential of the country comes from small and medium-sized U.S. companies. How will they be able to initiate export activities overseas if they cannot even open a bank account abroad?
Finally, FATCA creates systemic risks for the entire international financial community, through potential processing errors, chain effect, misinformation, etc. One measure of the law – the pass thru deemed essential by Congress for an air-tight system – has been defined as unworkable by the British Bankers’ Association and even by one of the authors of FATCA legislation, J. Richard Harvey, of Villanova University.
FATCA is bad law on all fronts and should be repealed.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Marylouise Serrato, Executive Director, American Citizens Abroad
TAS employees assist taxpayers whose tax problems are causing financial difficulty, who are seeking help in resolving tax problems that have not been resolved through normal channels, or who believe an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should. While all IRS personnel must consider and protect taxpayer rights, TAS employees have a special responsibility for ensuring the IRS treats all taxpayers fairly. In fiscal year 2012, TAS worked nearly 220,000 taxpayer cases.
How TAS helped influence the #IRS Fresh Start initiative to help struggling #taxpayers & #smallbiz. http://1.usa.gov/ZC4jyD
That’s a much stronger response from the ACA. They’ve always given me the impression that although they were against the Act they weren’t really trying that hard. That’s laid things out very clearly and precisely. Well done ACA.
The following article makes it clear that American citizenship is a very very very terrible, horrible, ugly thing for one who doesn’t live in America to be burdened with. It’s a ticking time bomb waiting for trouble:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/06/your-money/rules-aimed-at-tax-evasion-abroad-trip-up-average-americans.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
If your eyes enjoyed seeing this excellent ACA statement (mine did) then your ears will enjoy listening to this excellent ACA interview which Just Me offered on another thread. (Didn’t want it to get lost in the Brock shuffle.)
http://www.radiofrontier.ch/change-could-be-coming-to-us-tax-payers-abroad/
Bravo, ACA. Bravo, Anne Hornung-Soukup. What great interviews she has given — and this is maybe the best!
ACA knows that if reform is going to happen, it’s now or never, but will the USG do the right thing by its citizens abroad?
The below article in today’s NY Times is requesting comments from American expatriates as follows:
“Have you ever worked outside the United States? Please share with us any financial lessons you learned from your experience.”
http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/financial-lessons-for-american-expatriates/?src=rechp
@Bubblebustin
I don’t think it’s “now or never.” In fact, most of the people I talk with think tax reform is unlikely to pass this year but is more likely in 2014. But developments this year are important “laying down markers” for what happens next year, so, yes, we do need to engage now. Certainly, though, comprehensive tax reform is the best bet for both residence-based taxation and FATCA repeal — much harder to pass free-standing.
Thanks, Jim. “Now” in terms of the long history of the ACA’s struggle for tax reform, and if things aren’t bad enough now to effect change they “never” will be.
All the inspiration to get my submission into the International Tax Reform Working Group today. Here’s a link all so far (mine isn’t posted yet):
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/taxreform/workinggroups.htm
Three cheers for ACA and three cheers for Ms. Anne Hornung-Soukup– her interview posted above was great.
I completely support ACA’s campaign to end citizenship-based taxation, but I urge caution in being overly optimistic about achieving it. Punishing ex-pats with citizenship-based taxation is a 150 year old American tradition going back to the days of Abraham Lincoln.
A change to residence-based taxation is not going to come easy and has a high probably of not happening at all.
While it is unlikely residence based taxation will happen in the forseeable future, we can at least hope that some sanity is applied to FATCA as it relates to non US resident US Persons. I would continue to urge the Isaac Brock Society to prepare now (resources, experts, money) to challenge any IGA in multiple forums/jurisdictions by way of class action suits and lobbying. Canada is a key country with its 1M US Persons and millions of others (e.g. Canadian spouses and Canadian companies) affected.
I wonder what the timeline is for Canada. By when will they say a definite no to the IGA?
In Switzerland, this should happen with the June parliamentary session, but there would still be the question of popular initiatives and referendums, as well as local legal challenges.
I thought that this article on USP tax planning in Switzerland published via the ACA website and written by a financial professional was interesting.
However, it does not address the welfare, disability, unemployment “lacune” regarding the FEIE (Foreign Earned Income Exclusion).
@Steve Klaus,
In case you haven’t caught this comment and referral to Blaze at MapleSandbox regarding possible class-action suit, when the time comes:
http://isaacbrocksociety.ca/2012/03/04/class-action-suits/comment-page-5/#comment-259998
I sure hope that in the next week or so there’s an uptick in the number of people making submissions to the International Committee on tax reform, before the door closes. ACA’s Anne Hornung-Soukup’s glee in knowing that 1/3 of the submissions are in support of ACA’s proposal is greatly tempered by the fact that they number <50! This is a pathetic number of submissions considering it's so easy just to use ACA's form letter to make a submission (which I did not). Jim Jatras is right: "we do need to engage now"!
Here's the link again (you don't even need a US address!):
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/taxreform/
Maple thread on the ACA submission: http://maplesandbox.ca/2013/aca-blasts-fatca/#comment-6104
In contrast to the position of the ACA, the Canadian response of Diane Francis (dfrancis@nationalpost.com) at the respected Financial Post section of the National Post, a Canadian newspaper, is actually that Canada should tax Canadian persons wherever they reside–just like the US:
“Frankly, Canadians and others should adopt American tax laws where citizens are taxable irrespective of their residency. That’s how Washington stopped its crooks and gangsters from setting up shop in the Bahamas decades ago and how it catches most of them now.”
The online comments to the article are interesting, perhaps the most reasonable being: “The only way to effectively deal with this problem is for the Canadian government to either ban US persons from living in Canada, or make it clear to ‘regular’ Canadians the danger that Americans pose should you involve yourself with one…”.
Full article published April 6:
http://opinion.financialpost.com/2013/04/05/tax-avoidance-becoming-bigger-than-the-u-s-economy/
@IRSCompliantForever
I would LOVE the Canadian government to inform the US that the responsibilities put upon their citizens by their government pose a danger to Canadians, therefore they aren’t welcome in Canada.
@ IRSCompliantForever
With all due respect, I don’t think you have thought out the logical consequences of Citizenship taxation if you think…
There is a reason that 50 States in the Union and 192 countries around the world don’t go down that route, is that it is administratively unworkable, and frankly imposes chains as tax chattel based upon the accident of birth. Residency based taxation is the only fair method of imposing taxes, based upon receiving government services where you live.
For a read about what would happen if Canada, or the rest of the world adopted Citizenship taxation, I recommend this by Andy Sundberg (now passed) for your consideration… Thank you.
What is the Systemic Risk of Citizenship taxation to the World’s Economy….
Just Me,
To clarify, it is Diane Francis for the Financial Post, and not IRSCompliantForever, that embraces citizenship-based taxation for Canada:
It must be assumed from her article that Ms. Francis, who might be a US person unfortunately living in Canada, has no reservations whatsoever for the requirement (under threat of many penalties) to file each year forms 3520, 3520A, 1099, FBARS, 8938 (probably), the new 2014 form dealing with Obamacare tax, and others known and unknown if there is the hint of a foreign mutual fund, for the high privilege of earning $50 interest each year from a tiny TFSA–in order to catch those “crooks and gangsters.”
@ IRSCompliantForever
Why not post that in the comment section of DF’s article? Although I would rather you word it “who might unfortunately be a US person living in Canada” — just because I’m kind of Canadacentric. 😉
http://opinion.financialpost.com/2013/04/05/tax-avoidance-becoming-bigger-than-the-u-s-economy/
Em, done–with your phrasing and thanks.
@IRSCompliantForever
I stand corrected. Haven’t had time to read that story, and if I do, maybe I will make the same comment there.. 🙂
Dear U.S. Representative Adrian Smith and U.S. Representative John Larson,
Please do not stop your policy of ‘citizenship-based taxation’. As an underemployed cross-border accountant living and working in Canada, FATCA (and citizenship-based taxation) has been a blessing for me. My business has grown tremendously, as lots of my clients have revealed to me that they are ‘US persons’ and I have had to hire extra staff to help me process Canadian tax returns so that I can spend all my time preparing US returns and FBARS for my ‘US person’ clients.
In addition, I have friends in IT who were unemployed, but have recently found jobs in the banking industry to help ferret out ‘US persons’ who should be paying their fair share. Keep up the good work!
Sincerely,
Joe Blow CGA, CPA
Somewhere in Canada
@ IRSCompliantForever
Good on ya! I gave you an up arrow and will do the same for Just Me when he comments.