This post was on the RenouceUScitizenship blog.
Love him or hate him (and there was very little in between) former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau left his mark on Canada. The Trudeau Liberals brought Canadians a set of entrenched constitutional rights. From April 1, 1982 the history of Canada was forever changed.
1982: The Charter was intended to give individual Canadians rights …
The Canadian Charter of Rights was intended to give individual Canadians (including permanent residents who were non-citizens) an important set of rights that governments could not (as a general principle) override. These rights included rights in a number of categories including: legal rights, rights to freedom of expression, mobility rights, equality rights and more. Although originally touted as the “biggest make work project ever for lawyers”, Canadians in general have benefited from these rights. The focus of the Charter was on “individual rights”.
2012: The Charter may be used to shield the country of Canada from the U.S. FATCA attack …
#FATCA IGA may violate Canada’s constitution – interesting argument isaacbrocksociety.ca/2012/12/20/an-… – #americansabroad take note
— U.S. Citizen Abroad (@USCitizenAbroad) December 20, 2012
The Honourable Sinclair Stevens of the Progressive Canadian Party has argued that the Charter of Rights can be used to protect Canada from FATCA. According to an attendee at the recent FATCA Forum in Toronto Mr. Stevens emphasized that:
… the rights and protections of the Canadian Charter applied to permanent residents of Canada and that individuals in Canada are all equal and under the protection and benefits of that Charter regardless of race, nationality, ethnic origin, etc. He state unequivocably that Canada MUST obey the Charter (which would never allow for FATCA’s discriminatory parameters). He is a very well-spoken and articulate man and I was very impressed with his strong words and message about the importance of the Charter.
Prime Minister Trudeau would not have imagined that the Charter might be used to shield Canada from the U.S. FATCA attack. Talk about the law of unintended consequences … ! S. 15 of the Charter may be used to prevent the Government of Canada from entering into a FATCA IGA.
In other words, instead of the Government of Canada saying NO to FATCA, Canada will not enter into a FATCA IGA (which is what it should say):
S. 15 of the Charter may possibly be used for the Government of Canada to say:
No Canada will NOT enter into an IGA, because S. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights prohibits us from entering into an agreement with you that discriminates on the basis of citizenship and/or national origin.
Here is the text of Charter S. 15 (1):
Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Although S. 15 does not specify citizenship has a ground of discrimination the Supreme Court of Canada has included citizenship has a prohibited ground of discrimination. For the Government to help the IRS seek out U.S. citizens is to deny Canadians who are U.S. persons the equal benefit of privacy laws. (Now for the lawyers reading this, I realize that Charter S. 1 and the override are possible issues.) That said, the starting point in the analysis is the likely violation of S. 15.
Of course, S. 15 applies only to governments. Therefore, it may prohibit the Government of Canada from entering into a FATCA IGA. The Charter of Rights applies to government activity and would not affect the conduct of the banks and other FFIs. The prudent course would be to NOT sign the FATCA IGA and let Canadians see how their financial institutions are willing to betray them to the IRS. In other words:
For the government to sign an IGA is to give the Canadian banks the license to betray Canadians! This is another reason why there can be no IGA. Let the banks betray Canadians at their peril. Let the banks deal with the lawsuits. Let the banks absorb the costs! Let some banks advertise that they are a “FATCA Free Bank”.
The Financial Institutions are subject to provincial human rights codes that prohibit discrimination based on citizenship. It is up to Canadians to hold the Sun Life s and Bank of Nova Scotia s of the country accountable.
There are many reasons why Canada must say NO TO FATCA.
Imagine the Charter of Rights being used to protect Canada as a country from the U.S. led FATCA attack! Great example of unintended consequences …
Nationality, citizenship and ethnicity are very closely related terms. Nation=ethnos are synonyms etymologically–“nation” comes from Latin, ethnos comes from Greek. Nationality=citizenship in legal parlance. If the charter protects against discrimination based on national origin, then it is clear, the law may not discriminate against a legal Canadian resident based his/her citizenship or place of origin in a foreign nation. Clearly the Charter Rights were made for such a time as this. The current government, if it gives into the IGA, or the banks, if they begin to enforce FATCA in Canada, will be sorry. We will make them pay; that’s a promise:
Awesome, Petros – can you feel the energy building? Just wait ’till you guys see all the videos – you’ll be even more inspired. Stay tuned – I’m off work for the next two weeks so Santa’s going to have something in his bag for all of you very soon, with a little help from the elves.
Eagerly awaiting what the elves are tinkering with in your shop. There can be no greater gift than inspiration at this stage of the game, so thank you and everyone for your efforts in keeping us moving forward and out of the hands of despair.
The Charter may be the best thing that Pierre ‘Threwdough’ at ☺
Is S. 15 one of such rights that could be overridden by the notwithstanding clause?
Pingback: The Isaac Brock Society