FATCA and France
Posts on The Isaac Brock Society website concerning FATCA and France
For articles on other websites, see Media and Blog Articles
For general discussion of FATCA, see FATCA Discussion Thread
And for a group specifically focused on France, see l’Association des Américains accidentals website
June 2019
07: Lawsuits involving FATCA and aspects related to U.S. citizenship-based taxation
May 2019
April 2019
18: More Recent Anti-U.S. FATCA/CBT Activity in France, Netherlands, and Canada by Government Officials
September 2018
14: AmChan RO & DA September 2018 London Paris Frankfurt
July 2017
24: Fabien Lehagre on France’s TV5
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
11: Good News from the French Commission
June 2016
27: Pushback to #FATCA in France, Italy, Holland & Israel
February 2016
24:
29: Solving U.S. Citizenship Problems Sat, Mar 5, 2016 PARIS France
December 2014
14: France imposes American-style “saving clause” on Andorra
April 2014
02: France chafes at US $10 billion “masterful slap”
October 2013
16: French Finance Minister Moscovici STRONGLY endorses FATCA
December 2012
31: News From Europe: French Constitutional Council Rejects 75% Tax on Rich
18: Maclean’s Magazine: Belgium rejects France’s push to tax French citizens living in Belgium
09: France Taxes America: The Robin Hood Tax
July 2012
18: ING France’s message to USA: “FATCA? Thanks but no thanks.”
Thanks badger. Very significant IMO.
It’s official then (in the France-US treaty, and presumably in other US treaties:
the US can tax dual USCs up to the US rate on income
“not effectively taxed” or “not taxed up to the US rate” by the residence country.
<b<Not on pretended income from pretended forced sales or pretended forced distributions (exit tax, transition tax).
And that’s why the overwhelming majority of dual USCs living outside the US don’t file US tax returns and don’t need to, and will never have a problem with the IRS: they’re paying tax in their country of residence and are not affected at all by treaty provisions aimed at avoiding double taxation and preventing tax evasion.
The old options are the best options, and are all perfectly legal:
a) ignore
b) renounce
c) comply
(sort order: price low to high)
🙂 🙂 🙂
Should add: all the above IMO
It seems to me a clear acknowledgment by a spokesperson for one of the G5 countries who proposed and co-drafted the IGA, that having a US birthplace is not evidence of US tax liability.
It follows (at least in my non-lawyer logic) that using US birthplace as the primary indication that an accountholder has a US tax liability (and putting the onus on the accountholder to prove otherwise), is indefensible.
@badger
Very nice submission on les americains en France . Maybe we should join the EU…but then what difference would that make since we have a clueless PM .
Any IGA change that addresses the European bank access problems will presumably have to be acceptable to the EU, the residence country, and the US.
If a (bank access) solution is agreed in one IGA 1 country, it should be available to all IGA 1 countries, if I’m not mistaken.
@plaxy, re; “If a (bank access) solution is agreed in one IGA 1 country, it should be available to all IGA 1 countries, if I’m not mistaken.”
That is what I remember as well.
@Robert Ross, perhaps all these efforts in several countries (lawsuit in Canada, the efforts in France, the Australian efforts, etc.) will together be more than the sum of their parts….
Was this posted already on this thread?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-16/-accidental-americans-in-france-press-macron-for-irs-relief
‘Accidental Americans’ in France Press Macron for IRS Relief’
By Gregory Viscusi
April 15, 2018
‘ French citizens born in U.S. denied bank services due to Fatca’
‘Macron’s MPs ask him to raise issue with Trump during visit’
It’s not over ’til it’s over but I think it’s nearly over 🙂
@plaxy, interesting to see it at Bloomberg. Will be in suspense as to what the outcome is, and whether there is any followup media coverage.
badger – yes indeed. Fingers crossed.
Though the Bloomberg article is I believe more about who gets to tax Apple and other MNEs – an issue which may continue to have implications for compliant (or wouldbe compliant) expat USCs, but won’t necessarily have implications for US-born individuals currently encountering FATCA-related problems with local accounts in IGA 1 countries.
The corporate taxation / digital economy issue seems likely to be thorny, and I sympathize with would-be compliant expat USCs (America’s real diaspora) who find themselves caught up in the US – EU argy-bargy plus the US political argy-bargy on these matters.
On the other hand, I’m optimistic that the FATCA-related bank access problems will be resolved, for US-born individuals (i.e. not entities) seeking to open accounts in their country of residence (for IGA 1 countries).
Have to wait and see.
https://www.aaro.org/images/Press_Release-04-23-2018.jpg
see AARO link to document per legal complaint in France, against BNP Paribas Bank described in English by AARO as;
“….On April 22, 2018, a complaint for civil and criminal violations against the BNP Paribas Bank was filed with the National Commission for Informatics and Liberties and the Prudential Supervisory Authority, an independent administrative authority backed by the Bank de France, which protects customers of banking institutions.
This complaint, registered by Pierre Ciric, a lawyer in New York and a client of BNP Paribas Bank, concerns a series of civil and criminal violations concerning the use of personal data of expatriate customers in the United States and subject to the US FATCA law ( Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act).
According to this complaint, the BNP Paribas Bank is routinely blocking the accounts of expat-rated clients subject to the US FATCA law without sufficient legal basis, and is engaged in discriminatory practices vis-à-vis expatriates. trying to identify customers with “signs of Americanness”. In addition, the complaint denounces the existence of systematic exchanges of personal data between Bercy and the IRS since at least 1998, without the customers of the banks were never informed of these exchanges….”
https://www.aaro.org/advocacy/fatca/657-a-fatca-complaint-filed-against-bnp-paribas-bank
Repatriation Tax Seminar:
https://www.aaro.org/events/upcoming-events/event/132-the-repatriation-and-gilti-taxes-for-tax-professionals
As posted by Barbara on another IBS thread
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2018/0504/For-accidental-Americans-the-hidden-costs-prove-taxing
https://www.cbanque.com/actu/67950/banque-en-ligne-pourquoi-les-americains-accidentels-ne-peuvent-pas-y-acceder
‘Banque en ligne : pourquoi les Américains accidentels ne peuvent pas y accéder ?’
Thanks badger. Interesting. There was much comment in the UK press in 2014 when NS&I (a bank owned by the UK Chancellor and operated wholly online) suddenly closed accounts belonging to USCs. Explanations were demanded, and NS&I stated that FATCA compliance wasn’t regarded as a worthwhile use of taxpayers’ money.
There is another aspect to online (automated) operation. Most traditional banks also offer online services to their customers. If a customer applies for an account using these automated services, s/he can be easily and automatically sent down the path to rejection once a US place of birth is entered. No scope for reasonable explanations.
French AA group has posted on the American Expatriates FB page a link to a report on Senate consideration of the motion “for a resolution pursuant to Article 34-1 of the Constitution, inviting the Government to take into account the situation of “accidental Americans” concerned by the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).”
https://m.facebook.com/groups/334650186701060?refid=18&__tn__=C-R
further to @plaxy’s post above, a direct link;
http://www.senat.fr/espace_presse/actualites/201805/americains_accidentels_concernes_par_le_fatca.html#c640282
13 mai 2018
Accueil > Espace presse > “Américains accidentels” concernés par le FATCA
“Américains accidentels” concernés par le FATCA
Dernière mise à jour le 27 avril 2018
Mardi 15 mai 2018 à 18 heures, le Sénat examine la proposition de résolution en application de l’article 34-1 de la Constitution, invitant le Gouvernement à prendre en compte la situation des “Américains accidentels” concernés par le Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), présentée par Jacky DEROMEDI et plusieurs de ses collègues, à la demande du groupe Les Républicains.”
“Tuesday, May 15, 2018, the Senate unanimously adopted the motion for a resolution pursuant to Article 34-1 of the Constitution, inviting the Government to take into account the situation of “accidental Americans” involved in the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), presented by Jacky DEROMEDI and others, at the request of the group Les Républicains.” (Google translation)
http://www.senat.fr/espace_presse/actualites/201805/americains_accidentels_concernes_par_le_fatca.html#c640282
The resolution urges the French gov. to adopt measures respond to their concerns about
their right to abank account
the end of discrimination by french banks
reciprocity with respect to FATCA
information for French persons living in the US about fiscal consequences (if they leave?)
the start of diplomatic efforts to make renunciation free, simple, and without fiscal consequences.
reciprocity concerning the agreement of Nov 14, 2013. (IGA. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/15/business/international/us-and-france-agree-to-cooperate-more-intensively-against-tax-evasion.html)
Courtesy of myhigh school French. No guarantees.
“information for French persons living in the US about fiscal consequences (if they leave?)”
Perhaps warning them to get rid of a Green Card before those fiscal consequences kick in. And think very carefully, and think again, before going for citizenship.
“La nationalité américaine, un cadeau fiscal empoisonné ?”
https://lepetitjournal.com/expat-politique/la-nationalite-americaine-un-cadeau-fiscal-empoisonne-224518
aussi:
“« Américains accidentels » : Une première bataille gagnée !”
https://lepetitjournal.com/expat-politique/actualites/americains-accidentels-une-premiere-bataille-gagnee-230832
https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/europe/0301936622390-le-parlement-europeen-au-secours-des-americains-accidentels-2190567.php
‘Le Parlement européen au secours des « Américains accidentels »’
Gabriel Gresillon Le 08/07 à 09:47
J’aime la phrase:
“Américains un jour, Français toujours”
http://www.europe1.fr/societe/des-americains-accidentels-manifestent-a-paris-pour-interpeller-donald-trump-3798305