@RepDaveCamp to release draft to @FixOurTaxCode Feb. 26. Will it include a switch from CBT to RBT? http://t.co/CG3PnREEZu
— U.S. Citizen Abroad (@USCitizenAbroad) February 26, 2014
Thanks to @ShadowRaider for providing this update.
Here is the text of the bulletin.
Every year Americans spend more than six billion hours and $168 billion to file their returns.
There have been so many changes to the tax code over the past decade that it is now 10 times the size of the Bible, but with none of the Good News. That factual statement usually gets a good laugh back home in Michigan. What isn’t funny is the effect that constant tinkering with taxes has had on the people who pay them, and on the economy.
According to Nina Olsen, the National Taxpayer Advocate at the IRS, Americans overall spend over six billion hours and $168 billion every year to file their returns. This is stark testimony to the complexity of the tax code. Meanwhile, owners of small businesses face tax rates as high as 44.6%, while the total (state and federal) U.S. corporate rate, 39.1%, is the highest in the industrialized world.The last time the U.S. enacted a comprehensive tax reform was 1986. But many of America’s major competitors have been actively reforming their tax laws in recent years. Even our closest neighbors are getting ahead of us. Canada has already reformed its tax laws and Mexico is doing so right now. If Congress doesn’t take action, the U.S. risks falling further behind.
The tax code should make it easier for American companies to bring back profits earned overseas so they can be invested here. It should not hinder small businesses from growing into large businesses. And the individual income tax needs to be simpler, fairer and flatter for everyone.
On Wednesday, I am releasing what a simpler, fairer tax code actually looks like. The guiding principle is that everyone should play by the same rules—your tax rate should be determined by what’s fair, not by who you know in Washington. Here is what it would look like:
First, the tax code will be made simpler—so every family can do its own taxes confidently, without fearing an audit, or wondering if someone else who can afford an expensive accountant is getting a better deal.
Today there are 15 different tax breaks for education—nine for current expenses, two for past expenses and four for future expenses. The IRS instructions explaining it all come to almost 90 pages. That isn’t a tax code designed for working families; it is a tax code designed to make money for accountants.
Last year, my Democratic counterpart on the Ways and Means Committee, Sandy Levin of Michigan, and I created 11 bipartisan working groups to tackle different parts of the tax code. One of those, headed by Diane Black (R., Tenn.) and Danny Davis (D., Ill.), looked into those education provisions. After months of work, the leaders of the working group recently came forward with a plan that consolidates four of these provisions into one improved credit, making it easier for families and students to afford a college education.
Paired with more commonsense reforms like increasing the standard deduction and the child tax credit will mean that nearly 95% of the country can get the lowest possible tax rate by just filing the basic IRS 1040A form—no more itemizing, no more keeping track of all those receipts, and no more filling out all those extra schedules, forms and work sheets.
Second, the tax code will be made more effective and efficient by getting rid of special-interest handouts, which will mean lower tax rates for individuals, families and all businesses. Under this plan, over 99% of tax filers will face a top tax rate of 25%—allowing small and large businesses alike to expand operations, hire new workers and increase benefits and take home pay. On the individual side, there will be an introductory bracket of 10%.
Nonpartisan, independent economists at the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation have already analyzed this plan. According to those estimates, after this streamlining of the tax code, the size of the economy will increase by $3.4 trillion over the next decade, or roughly 20% compared with today. This will lead to nearly two million new jobs—and producing up to $700 billion in additional federal revenues that can be used to lower taxes even further or reduce the debt.
What does this mean for you and your family? Because we will have a healthier economy, wages will rise. With more income but lower tax rates, families with a median income ($51,000 for a family of four) will have on average an extra $1,300 in their pocket at the end of the year.
Third, make the tax code fairer and more accountable. That means no more hidden provisions that benefit a favored few, and no more tax increases to fuel more spending.
We can clean up provisions like “carried interest” that allow certain private-equity firms to get the investment-income tax rate on what anyone else would call normal wage income. We’ll also put an end to special depreciation benefits related to corporate jets and close, once and for all, the infamous “John Edwards” loophole that allows a select few to avoid employment taxes on their income. The revenue gained from that provision, and many others like shifting to Roth-style retirement accounts for those contributing more than $8,750 (only 5% of the workforce) can be used to lower tax rates across the board.
The tax code changes in my plan are not intended as a means of raising revenue. If loopholes are closed, Americans should get the benefit by way of lower rates.
Tax reform needs to be about strengthening the economy and making the code simpler and fairer. That’s what Republican President Ronald Reagan did when he worked with Democrats in Congress in 1986. We need to get to work and repeat that success.
Excuse me if I don’t get my hopes up.
It is like they know of these problems and still do nothing to resolve them. Likely because right now, it is in “their” favor.
Let’s stop right there: the US should be playing by the same rules as the rest of the world — and that is with fair residence-based taxation law. All countries should be playing by the same rules.
While it is hard to get our hopes up, we can’t stop the fight to change this very thing. If the US had RBT, this site would not be necessary.
They don’t ever think ANYTHING they do is “wrong” They stubbornly believe in their CBT and most haven’t a clue the rest of the world doesn’t do things that way.
They’d be smart to go to RBT but, I can see that going over like a lead balloon down there unless it was done very quietly. It’s infuriating since really it would be very easy to go to RBT for legitimate long term expats as a start. The numbskulls are simply frozen in the Civil War era and believe expats ought to be punished for leaving. Most don’t even know why they believe these things or aren’t aware of their gut feelings that expats are “getting away with something”
Most thinking people, especially conservatives, view McCain and Levin as Idiots who should have a keeper present before they are allowed to talk. They work for someone other than the American People.
…but they do know they live in a country entitled above others.
The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearing on Tax Treaties is also beginning shortly.
http://www.foreign.senate.gov/hearings/treaties-02-26-2014
Thank you for this, Tim. Here is the opening statement to the proceedings by none other than Robert B. Stack: Opening Statement of Robert B. Stack Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary (International Tax Affairs) Senate Committee on Foreign Relations February 26, 2014
Calgary, this is actually the first time I have seen what Robert B. Stack looks like from the video feed.
The tax reform plan is set to be released at 1:30pm (EST/UTC-5). It’s expected to include territorial taxation for corporations, so it will be a travesty if it doesn’t do anything for individuals in the international area.
And, he’s right now talking about FATCA IGA’s — and how the US will be comfortable, kicking the tires.
Thanks for this further information, Shadow Raider.
Well, now this is RICH “The United States will only exchange tax information with a country if we are satisfied that the county will protect the information we have provided.”
No mention follows of how secure the data being sent to the U.S. will be protected. No offer to “satisfy” other nations of such either. God this guy is an arrogant knob!
Sorry if this is off topic, but does anyone know if expats are expected to pay this ‘obamacare’ tax?
http://www.atr.org/irs-warns-obamacare-tax-must-paid-a8164
@serfingUSA: that’s my understanding. But you still have to pay for health care in your country of residence, and you get no health care benefits in the US. That’s called “fair” or “shared responsibility”.
The Carl Levin hearing is worse. There is a live blog if you can’t stand to the listen to the asshole.
http://blogs.ft.com/the-world/liveblogs/2014-02-26-2/?Authorised=false
@serfingUSA, People living outside the US are automatically deemed compliant with the mandate, so they are not expected to pay this penalty. See question 12 in this IRS link.
It’s possible some crooked banker will take a payout from a terrorist group to get a ready made list where Americans are living abroad from some bank somewhere.
“No hope for tax reform this year”:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/25/mcconnell-no-hope-tax-reform-year/
I can most assuredly see them going to territorial taxation for corporations but, not going to RBT for individuals. That would be par for the course for both parties in the U.S. and for the government which is corporate owned anyway.
@atticusincanada
So basically outside the holy land… the info is is a library to all… inside the holy land… its sacred… got to keep it private & secret
Translation…. Inside US… info sent is nothing worthwhile & they can be sued if just sent… Outside.. Map of everyone right or wrong… as a US Person… no legal recourse or say.. too bad for the rest
Just released.
So far, I only see international corporate tax issues mentioned.
Nothing on RBT but it looks like “part” of the IRC 877 exit tax is repeal under the Camp draft. I specifically mean part not all. It refers to IRC 877 not the IRC 877A mark to market provisions.
Tim
AAAAAAAAARRRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!! NNNOOOOOOOOOO! WHAT THE @#$%!@#$@%#**#$&*!!!!!! They completely ignored everything! After all the meetings and comments sent by so many people, they didn’t even touch the subject of CBT, FBAR, FATCA, nothing! Not even a note or request for comments on the topic like the Finance Committee did! Absolutely nothing! I can’t believe it!
They wrote a huge bill to reform the tax system, including territorial taxation for corporations, but continued to ignore international individuals as if they didn’t exist. Actually, they aren’t ignoring anymore, because now they clearly know about all the problems. They deliberately chose not to do anything. As Petros would say, I am just livid.
Folks, it was a very nice, patient, fair and honest try, but this is just beyond our power. I finally accept the situation that most Americans abroad will have to renounce or relinquish US citizenship (and that many immigrants will have to abandon their green cards), as many of you already did. At least the US allows that, unlike Eritrea. If the numbers keep increasing, maybe Congress might change their minds, but for now, there is nothing else I can do. Sorry, but I tried everything and more. It’s just impossible.
I hope you all make the best decision in your own cases, and are able to leave this monster behind and go on with your lives. I appreciate the many thanks you have written to me during this time, and I thank you all as well for showing me this whole subject that changed my world view. It wasn’t all in vain. I wish you all the best.