This post was on the RenounceUScitizenship blog.
The Most Ridiculous Law of 2013 (So Far): It Is Now a Crime to Unlock Your Smartphone – Derek Khanna – The Atlantic theatlantic.com/business/archi…
— U.S. Citizen Abroad (@USCitizenAbroad) January 28, 2013
What do you think?
According to the article:
This is now the law of the land:
BY DECREE OF THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS
IT SHALL HENCEFORCE BE ORDERED THAT AMERICANS SHALL NOT UNLOCK THEIR OWN SMARTPHONES.
PENALTY: In some situations, first time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both.*
That’s right, starting this weekend it is illegal to unlock new phones to make them available on other carriers.
I have deep sympathy for any individual who happens to get jail time for this offense. I am sure that other offenders would not take kindly to smartphone un-lockers.
But seriously: It’s embarrassing and unacceptable that we are at the mercy of prosecutorial and judicial discretion** to avoid the implementation of draconian laws that could implicate average Americans in a crime subject to up to a $500,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
If people see this and respond, well no one is really going to get those types of penalties, my response is: Why is that acceptable? While people’s worst fears may be a bit unfounded, why do we accept a system where we allow such discretionary authority? If you or your child were arrested for this, would it comfort you to know that the prosecutor and judge could technically throw the book at you? Would you relax assuming that they probably wouldn’t make an example out of you or your kid? When as a society did we learn to accept the federal government having such Orwellian power? And is this the same country that used jury nullification against laws that it found to be unjust as an additional check upon excessive government power? [The only silver lining is that realistically it's more likely that violators would be subject to civil liability under Section 1203 of the DMCA, instead of the fine and jail penalties, but this is still unacceptable (but anyone who accepts payments to help others unlock their phones would clearly be subject to the fine of up to $500,000 and up to five years in jail).]
Forget FBAR, FATCA, and citizenship-based taxation without representation. Would anybody in their right mind even imagine that such a law exists? Would anybody imagine that the penalties could be so draconian?
You would have to “brave” indeed and sacrifice your freedom to live in the “land of the free and the home of the brave”. Maybe this was the reason that Tina Turner realized that U.S. citizenship was not NOT “simply the best” or NOT “better than all the rest“.