We got an anonymous tip in our ADCS-ADSC.ca email letting us know that we have made it to the big time.
Go to the Wikipedia page about FATCA and scroll down to “Opposition” – we are listed just under the entry about James Bopp, superlawyer.
There is a link to our website there. Thank you anonymous tipper and thank you anonymous editor in Wikipedia who added us.
The Isaac Brock Society and Maple Sandbox are also listed 🙂
http://riafan.ru/2014/07/15/27874-briks-vmesto-g7-rossiya-delaet-pravilnyiy-vyibor/
A timely Russian report by Vladimir Vinnikov on the BRICS summit in Brazil, presenting further evidence of the undeniable relationship between FATCA and the accelerating worldwide abandonment of the US dollar.  Or, as the Google-translated article so quaintly puts it, “Cinderella carriage turn into a pumpkin.”
BRICS instead of G7: Russia makes the right choice
Today, in the Brazilian city of Fortaleza in the north-east of the country “in a narrow composition” started VI BRICS summit, which then moves to the capital Brasilia. The main event of the summit, many observers recognize participation in the work of Russian President Vladimir Putin, before he has visited Cuba, Nicaragua and Argentina, and in Brazil spent the eve of the summit, a series of bilateral negotiations – including President Xi Jinping and Chancellor Angela Merkel.
These meetings confirmed that Russia’s position in the international arena, including – and Ukrainian problem – find understanding and support all over the world except the United States and a narrow circle of their closest allies, united in the G7. Therefore we can say that the attempt by the West to isolate Russia and turn it into a pariah state, accusing him of aggression against Ukraine, failed completely.
Moreover, apparently, “expulsion” of the Russian “Big Eight” and return to the U.S. format G7 go down in history of world diplomacy as a classic example of what irreversible error literally doomed recent superpower, are in the decline of its power.
Moreover, irreversibility, and not a coincidence these errors once again proved by the efforts that the United States is applied to force the banks to participate in the world system of financial control FATCA, the introduction of which is estimated to most experts, lead to a massive failure of holders of dollar-denominated assets in U.S. currency.
http://www.banktech.com/hey-regulators-how-about-more-carrot-and-less-stick–/a/d-id/1297320
UPDATE: The original article was mysteriously removed today so the link above no longer works. George, however, located a copy via Google Cache and it is available here for now. A .pdf text version is also available here.
UPDATE #2 – mystery of the disappearance of original article solved — “there was a problem”. Lucky for us — George found a copy via Google Cache (see above):
From: Katherine Burger
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 8:36 AM
To: caroltapanila
Subject: RE: Article July 16, 2014Dear Carol – thank you for the note and feedback. However, the article no longer is available – there was a problem and we had to pull it from the site. However, Fred Cook is one of our regular contributors so hopefully there will be new content from him soon.
Kathy
Kathy Burger
Editorial Director
Insurance & Technology
Bank Systems & Technology
UBM Tech
O: 212-600-3062 I E: katherine.burger@ubm.com
From: caroltapanila
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 6:35 PM
To: Katherine Burger
Subject: Article July 16, 2014
Ms. Burger,
Information Week’s Bank Systems and Technology journal had online briefly this morning a very good, very honest article on the Foreign Bank Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) by Fred Cook. The title was:
“Hey, Regulators: How About More Carrot & Less Stick?”Can I get a copy of that article or can you let me know how I can get in contact with the author, Fred Cook?
Thanks very much for your assistance in obtaining a copy of the above article.
Carol Tapanila
Calgary, AB, Canada
*****
Looks like the financial industry is finally realizing that FATCA is no one night stand but rather a shotgun wedding from hell – and the honeymoon is over.
We hear a lot about how the FATCA compliance industry is gleefully raking-in wheelbarrows full of consulting fees to design and commission new data management systems for banks and other financial institutions, but rarely have we heard from those on the inside who have to manage a growing plethora of complex and costly compliance programs.  A scant couple of weeks after FATCA’s inauguration, there are already signs of “FATCA fatigue” setting-in and, perhaps, a belated realization that something is just not ethically or legally right about FATCA.
Here are excerpts from an article by Fred Cook in Information Week’s Bank Systems and Technology journal:
Hey, Regulators: How About More Carrot & Less Stick?
For banks to afford the resources needed to handle today’s regulatory demands, it may be time to discuss changes in compliance enforcement with the regulators.
I do appreciate the need to provide information related to potential criminal activity for the benefit of society at large, but the recent Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) still has me shaking my head. This new regulation requires institutions to report taxable information on US citizens (living in Canada) via the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) to the US government. This means that, when we open accounts in Canada, we’re now required to collect customers’ citizenship details. We also have to ascertain the citizenship of all our current clients, even though citizenship is not a requirement for opening or servicing a financial account. We are also required to report, through the CRA, details of any US citizen living in Canada with account balances of more [than] $50,000. Ironically, until now asking for personal information such as citizenship was in direct violation of Canada’s privacy laws.
How is implementing the overhead of FATCA regulations a benefit to the institution’s business? Is it not just doing the US Internal Revenue Service’s work for it? I would make the same case for tracking deposits larger than $10,000, reporting suspicious transactions, or determining politically exposed people and providing details about them to government and police agencies — for free. Though managing these “offloading” regulatory requirements doesn’t have any direct benefit to managing the bank’s core business, they must be followed to stay in business under threat of substantial fines and criminal charges.
These government and policing agencies have zeroed in on the fact that banking is a necessity, and that the institutions providing these banking services have access to very personal information otherwise not readily available on consumers and their monetary habits. Therefore, my expectation is that our regulations will continue to expand while new ones are added.
Ghana, with an in-country population of about 24 million and an emigrant population of between 1.5 million and 3 million (says the IOM), had 817 applications for renunciation of citizenship in 2013, reports Ghana News Agency. The government reacted calmly and painted an accurate picture of the diaspora and their reasons for renunciation:
Elaborating further on the issue, Mr David Agorsor, Director in Charge of Migration Unit of the Ministry said majority of the applicants were health professionals, especially doctors and nurses … He explained that, such people renounced their Ghanaian nationality because they are mostly offered job opportunities in those countries which do not recognize dual citizenship.
Meanwhile, Reed Amendment author Jack Reed is apparently frustrated by the repeated failure of his more recent attempts to ban even more ex-citizens. And perhaps he’s still stinging from Daniel Moynihan’s October 1996 speech deriding his legislative drafting skills. So he’s used his position on the Senate Appropriations committee to get the following language inserted into the report on the latest Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill:
Under section 212(a)(10)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Department of Homeland Security has the authority to deny admission to former U.S. citizens that are deemed to have expatriated for purposes of tax avoidance. In over a decade, the Department has not issued regulations nor has it undertaken any significant steps to enforce this provision. The Committee directs the Secretary to report within 90 days on the steps the Department is undertaking to enforce this law, including a schedule for issuing guidance or regulations, if necessary.
Not quite exactly but pretty close.
Reluctantly, Patriot Flees Homeland for Greener Tax Pastures
Heather Bresch grew up around politics. Her father is Joe Manchin, the Democratic senator from West Virginia and a former governor. She has heard him say repeatedly, “We live in the greatest country on Earth,” as he did in countless political advertisements. And it appeared to rub off on her: Ms. Bresch was named a “Patriot of the Year” in 2011 by Esquire magazine for helping to push through the F.D.A. Safety Innovation Act.
But on Monday, Ms. Bresch announced plans to renounce her company’s United States citizenship and instead become a company incorporated in the Netherlands, where the tax rates are lower. She did so by agreeing to acquire Abbott Laboratories’ European generic drug business.
The following discussion is taking place this morning, starting here: https://isaacbrocksociety.ca/2014/06/01/its-time/comment-page-30/#comment-2235706
Deckard also highlights this offline:
Ottawa prepares to share personal data with foreign governments
While this article focuses on immigration, it’s a perfect opportunity to bring in the FATCA IGA again.
An excerpt:
Cabinet will also now be permitted to allow the “disclosure of information to verify the citizenship status or identity of any person” to enforce any Canadian law “or law of another country.”
Since it is now July, and hotter than a cat on a tinfoil hat, this story may make your temperature rise:
We’ll have an update on July – never mind, just watch the video.
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d35c2f66-5a6d-4612-8a44-a5b507a755d3
Implementation of the FATCA Treaty
The Dutch Ministry of Finance has launched a consultation on a decree implementing the FATCA Treaty. The decree requires Dutch financial institutions to provide information about bank accounts of US tax subjects, and to report financial institutions that do not comply with their FATCA obligations.
The Netherlands and the United States entered into a treaty on the implementation of the FATCA Treaty in December 2013. A bill providing for the ratification of the treaty will be submitted to parliament shortly.
Perhaps someone from the Dutch government should have a little chat with Allison Christians.
The excellent interview by All In A Day’s host Alan Neal with Allison Christians and Kathleen:
Comments on this excellent article here and there at Isaac Brock, so will heed “JC” request to post:
The Canadian-US tax treaty covers all aspects of taxation between the two countries. The current treaty cedes Canadian sovereignty to the U.S. and permission to double tax by not specifying exemptions such as for retirement accounts, the family home, life insurance, mutual funds, outrageous noncompliance penalties for Canadian tax residents, etc.
Everyone: there is a highly relevant new article here in regards to the injustice that has not had sufficient attention on this website: WSJ, David Kuenzi: American Expats Tax Nghtmare.
Or, if you have cannot access, the article is here
*************
Note: David Kuenzi, Certified Financial Planner,® Founder, Thun Financial Advisors, Madison, WI spoke at the May 2, 2014 Toronto Forum Debate on CBT vs RBT (we’re still awaiting an ACA video of this forum).
