Media and Blog Articles Open for Comments – Part 6 of 11 (Year 2019)
You can access all years at this link: Media and Blog Articles – Links for All Years
If clicking on a link brings you to the wrong page in the comment stream, click here to get to the most recent comments.
Media and Blog Articles
EmBee suggested that it would be good if there was a thread for new articles, so that people would be aware of where to comment. So, I created this permanent page. I’ll make a permanent list of links posted here and keep adding to it, but not deleting, so we’ll end up having sort of a “bibliography” of FATCA/CBT articles. [Note: Some articles are not open for comments]
For more articles on FATCA, enter FATCA into Google then click on the link “more news for fatca” just below the most recent featured article.
Notes:
From JC: To see #FATCA on Twitter for latest breaking news. JC finds that is quite a good source and there even are some international articles that one may read using Google Translate. Others may help certain tweets and articles remain in elevated position by retweeting them.
From Badger: On an important archival note, please use the Internet Archive Wayback machine https://archive.org/web/ (see bottom right ‘Save Page Now’ box to enter URLs of webpages you want saved for posterity, and try to save backup copies of articles and other items of interest in some other form – such as a datastick or external drive. Some important and very significant webpages and the fulltexts of articles are no longer available (although some can be retrieved if someone using the Wayback machine saved them).
Be sure to read the comment stream for this thread — there are usually very recent articles mentioned.
2019.12.15
Canadians travelling to or through the US should pay attention to their withering rights, H.M. Jocelyn, CBC News, Canada.
2019.12.12
EU revives issue of FATCA information exchange as year-end deadline for banks approaches, Helen Burggraf, AmericanExpatFinance.
2019.12.10
13 Reasons Why I Committed Citizide, John Richardson, TaxConnections.
US tax filing requirements that Americans living in Canada should know, David Altro and Avi Guttman, Globe and Mail, Canada.
2019.12.07
Confirmed – Rep. Holding to leave Congress at end of 2020, after reintroducing Tax Fairness for Americans Abroad Act, Helen Burggraf, AmericanExpatFinance.
2019.12.06
Trump is trying to make it took expensive for poor immigrants to stay, Annalisa Merrelli, Quartz, US.
2019.12.05
Revenue Neutrality And A Move To Residence-based Taxation: Open Letter To Democrats Abroad, John Richardson, Karen Alpert, Laura Snyder, TaxConnections.
What It’s Like to Retire Abroad, Glenn Ruffenach, Wall Street Journal, US.
2020.01.01: This thread is now closed. Please comment at Media and Blog Articles Part 7 of 7
.
Not that I would endorse anything that Facebook creates … but the pace for the elimination of the US$ as the international trade settlement currency is accelerating and Congress persons are getting worried.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/453500-dem-lawmaker-says-facebooks-cryptocurrency-could-be-more-dangerous-than
Every year the proportion of the U.S. economy to that of the world get smaller. About 20% currently.
http://www.aei.org/publication/dynamic-graph-of-the-day-top-ten-countries-by-gdp-1961-to-2017/
The previous page show lots going on in terms of addressing the injustices (more than in past years), while some here at Brock may think it kind of quiet as there has not been many features and postings here than in past years and we are waiting to hear from the Canadian Government in regards to the lawsuit.
Further to the article in The Hill linked to above by nervousinvestor –
it looks like US legislators aren’t the only ones that can’t figure out what they should do about digital currencies. 🙂
“Virtual Currency, FBAR, and the Ripple Effect”
https://procedurallytaxing.com/virtual-currency-fbar-and-the-ripple-effect/
Looks bad:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-19/french-court-declines-to-overturn-fatca-tax-treaty-with-u-s?utm_source=google&utm_medium=bd&cmpId=google
All roads lead to renunciation. Or going underground.
“US signs off on ‘milestone’ double taxation treaty with Switzerland”
https://www.thelocal.ch/20190718/us-signs-off-on-milestone-double-taxation-treaty-with-switzerland
Protocols with Japan, Luxembourg, and Spain were also ratified. US citizens resident in those countries, and filing US tax returns, may want to check whether the protocol for their country includes this mandatory arbitration clause.”
The IRS says (about mandatory arbitration):
“Certain U.S. income tax treaties provide for mandatory binding arbitration to resolve eligible cases in which the competent authorities have endeavored but are unable to reach a complete agreement. To date, arbitration is included in the U.S. income tax treaties with Belgium, Canada, France, and Germany. More information on mandatory binding arbitration under these treaties, together with associated documents, is available through the following links” etc
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/international-businesses/mandatory-tax-treaty-arbitration
And now four more.
Possibly to fend off the MLI.
Please Retweet/Like on Twitter:
Boris, are you saluting #AmericaFirst on British soil?
This once was “OUTRAGEOUS” to you:
#FATCA
U.S. Double Taxation of US Persons in Britain.
@BorisJohnson was born in America / was a U.S. Citizen & will over time attract questions about why he dropped it. #TaxScam #expats
https://twitter.com/JCDoubleTaxed/status/1154271683106111493?s=20
“Five Things to Know about the Pending Tax Treaties in the Senate”
https://taxfoundation.org/us-tax-treaties-senate-2019/
Interesting analysis of why four have at long last been voted on and passed by the US Senate (in order to fend off the MLI, as I suggested above); why three haven’t yet been passed but probably soon will (only waiting to have BEAT-related language removed); and one (the MLI) may languish indefinitely.
One may only hope that the U.S. prods France/Macron to point out the hypocrisy of such statement (Tweet by Trump): The tax part not the wine part:
France just put a digital tax on our great American technology companies. If anybody taxes them, it should be their home Country, the USA. We will announce a substantial reciprocal action on Macron’s foolishness shortly. I’ve always said American wine is better than French wine!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1154791664625606657?s=20
Please Retweet/Like on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/JCDoubleTaxed/status/1154882173909925888?s=20
#America was founded by rejection of #British taxation of the #colonists.
Today, only #USA taxes its colonists from afar
Contra to American founding principles !
@EmmanuelMacron
@BorisJohnson
END The Double Taxation
END #FATCA
@freedomcaucus
#Liberty from US #tyranny
DT: “We tax our companies, they don’t tax our companies”
Sounds like he has no clue about the territoriality for COMPANIES that his administration passed.
Forgive me if this has been posted before somewhere. https://americanexpatfinance.com/tax/item/217-accidental-americans-latest-french-banks-warn-of-need-to-close-40-000-accounts
I have seen a number of articles saying the IRS is going to target those who used the programs to come clean about foreign assets. The gift that keeps on giving.
http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/830698/tax+authorities/IRS+Targeting+PostVoluntary+Disclosure+Compliance+With+New+Campaign
Democrats Abroad: “Work on legislation to enact Residency Based Taxation (RBT) is currently in the hands of Ways and Means Committee staffers.” Also they’re clinging to that old chestnut of same country exemption:
https://www.democratsabroad.org/carmelan/mid-summer_expat_tax_reform_updates
You can’t have RBT with FBAR continuing. I did not see mention of SCE excluding FBAR.
Many have said FATCA SCE would mean more paperwork for banks (such as then have to certify each person each year that they are a resident of a country). Plus is problematic for places such as the common market of Europe when people may often live in one country but have an account in another, and work in another. As Karen points out there is no penalty on banks for over-reporting, so they will likely choose what is easiest for them and that is to keep the over-regulation and discrimination in place.
The new acting IRS Taxpayer Advocate (Nina Olson retired in June this year);
https://taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/about/our-leadership
Correction to above, Nina Olson retired from the IRS TAS in July, not June
https://taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/news/NTA_Farewell?category=Tax%20News
Can’t see how this would actually work;
“U.S. citizens and long-term residents (lawful permanent residents in eight out of the last 15 taxable years) whoexpatriated on or after June 17, 2008, may not have met their filing requirements or tax obligations. The InternalRevenue Service will address noncompliance through a variety of treatment streams, including outreach, softletters, and examination. ” http://src.bna.com/J30
When the IRS has such deep funding problems, how could they possibly be successful at going back to 2008 to review, locate, track down and compel expatriates? Expats (and those with surrendered PR status) are outside the US. And the IRS has significant constraints in trying to collect extraterritorially even if it could locate people outside the US retroactively and manage to assess US tax or penalties. Are they merely trying to use threats as leverage again?
I can’t see why anyone with no US assets would even respond from outside the US. Especially those who’ve already expatriated.
Will the IRS try to compare tax returns received against the list of those who have renounced? That sounds like a major paper exercise, particularly as the renunciation forms don’t ask for a social security number.
*** SPECIAL FATCA UPDATE *** Are Americans just IRS penalties waiting to happen?
Justice McTavish is a self-proclaimed “speed bump”. Let her lie.
If anyone is interested, and for what little it’s worth, the quarterly list of names in the Federal Register is open for public inspection at
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2019-17498.pdf
As usual, it contains some duplicated names, one on the very first page and some more in the surnames starting with T.