US expat tax and FBAR: Discussion thread (Ask your questions) Part Two
Please ask your questions here about US Expat tax and FBAR.
Participants will need to provide their e-mail address (real or fake) and an alias. The only written rule is that participants must use a same alias each time they post (and not “anonymous” or derivatives thereof).
Bear in mind that any responses that you get from participants is peer-to-peer help, and it is not intended as a replacement for professional advice. Also, the Isaac Brock Society provides this disclaimer: neither the Society nor any of its members are professionals. We offer our advice here only in friendship and we recommend that our readers seek professional advice if they need it.
If you wish to receive an e-mail notification of comments, check the box to that effect when making your first comment.
NB: This discussion is a continuation of an older discussion that became to large for our software to handle well. See US expat tax and FBAR: Discussion thread (Ask your questions) Part One.
I just found a notice in my mailbox that the postman tried to deliver a registered letter in my absence. Today is Saturday, so I have no chance of getting it before Monday. It was addressed to ‘Mr.’ …, which leaves me to believe it came from the USA. My question is this: has anyone ever received registered mail from the IRS or Treasury? I never received anything registered from them before, but I’m concerned about it and would be interested to hear if anyone else has. Thanks in advance for your help.
@notamused
After being in OVDI for 19 months now, I welcome anything from the IRS, but to answer your question, no. The only correspondence I’ve received were two unregistered letters from Treasury telling us our private letter ruling for our RRSP’s was rejected and being sent over to OVDI and another containing the refund cheque for it.
@bubblebustin
I’ve read a *bit* about private letter rulings. They cost $$ to file, right? Did you get a lawyer to do yours, or did you do it yourself? And, is the $$ refunded if it’s rejected (the refund cheque you mention)?
I’m trying to get some certainty on how to go from non-compliance to 5 years compliance, so thought a PLR may be the way. Probably isn’t, but won’t know till I find out.
TIA
@bubblebustin
Thanks for your reply. Hopefully I’m just being needlessly paranoid.
@tdott
We applied for a PLR through our lawyer, and yes it was a refund on the fee we paid for it, however we lost money because of what we paid our lawyer, and at the time the exchange rates worked against us on the refund! Our rejection is entirely due to the fact that we are in OVDI. We are now sitting in limbo. What should you do? Phil Hodgen offers advice:
http://hodgen.com/how-the-irs-can-make-rrsp-cleanups-painless/
And more recent and specific to Canadian RRSP’s on taxblawg:
http://taxblawg.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/sheppard_intertaxjrnl_2-4-13.pdf
Worth reading re expatriation, FBAR, certification of 5 years ‘compliance’ and FBAR, CRA and FBAR, 8854, Covered expatriate status, etc.
Good to pass on to Members of Parliament who don’t have a clue what is at stake and how hard it is to expatriate.
sorry,
forgot the link:
http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/kevyn-nightingale/0/b32/510
Expatriation: The American’s Tax Experience in Canada
Canadian Tax Foundation (Canadian Tax Journal vol 61 #1)
May 1, 2013
Authors: Kevyn Nightingale, Dave Turchen
“This article catalogues the tax challenges faced by US citizens living in Canada – the onerous filing requirements and the limitations on their ability to utilize normal Canadian tax planning techniques.
As a result, many Americans are choosing to renounce US citizenship. The article then discusses the tax implications of that decision. This is a peer-reviewed article.
The Article is posted under “experience”, above. While usage is free, any publication of the article must cite the Canadian Tax Foundation as publisher (see the CTF website or contact me for details). “
@badger
I can’t see the article on LinkedIn. Do I need a premium account? Do I need to connect to him first? There is no “experience” section visible to me.
@WhatamI
I got it by clicking on the headline “Expatriation: The American’s Tax Experience in Canada”.
@WhatAmI
I didn’t see it either.
Here’s another way to get to it: http://www.ctf.ca/ctfweb/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2013CTJ1.aspx
@bubblebustin
There is no such headline visible to me on the LinkedIn page, even if I click the “more” button at the bottom of the Activity section. There is no Experience section. Do you have a premium account? Are you connected to him?
@tdott
Thanks, that works.
More mention of Marie Sapirie’s July 16, 2013 taxanalysts article ‘News Analysis: The Personal Impact of Offshore Enforcement’ http://www.taxanalysts.com/www/features.nsf/Articles/8E6965DFA3441ADF85257BAA0048E526?OpenDocument in July 17th, 2013 piece by Joe Kristan on the Roth & Co. site. http://rothcpa.com/2013/07/tax-roundup-7172013-stories-of-wounded-jaywalkers-and-checking-in-on-rashia/
“Marie Sapirie of Tax Analysts has an excellent piece about how the IRS offshore account enforcement program treats the thousands of ordinary Americans abroad — and many green card holders living in the U.S. — as presumptive tax criminals when they try to remedy foot-fault paperwork violations in reporting offshore accounts….”
He particularly notes;
“…The taxpayer, like many others, sought help from a congressional representative in reaching a satisfactory resolution with the IRS. The response that the lawmaker received from the IRS — that the taxpayer could renounce U.S. citizenship — was disappointing….”
“When the IRS is telling people to expatriate themselves, something is very wrong.”……….
Phil Hodgen is hosting a webinar on U.S. Tax Solutions for Non-Filers Abroad.
It might be worth for someone from IBS, with those issues and who want to become compliant to attend, and summarize the session in a post.
http://hodgen.com/web-based-seminar-u-s-tax-solutions-for-non-filers-abroad-2/
Attendance is limited to 10 people.
Has the consitutionality of Canada’s allowing the IRS to collect taxes in Canada ever been challenged? I know that there is protection for Canadian citizens who might also be considered US persons. However, what I find questionable is any cooperation at all by CRA even in helping IRS with collecting from people who are US citizens only and residing legally in Canada.
My reasoning is this : any collection of taxes in Canada on transactions ( including payment of salaries, interest and dividends) taking place in Canada is the same thing as levying taxes in Canada. The Canadian Constitution and Canada’s laws specify who can levy taxes in Canada ( e.g. the federal government, the provinces, municipalities ). How can it be legal to allow a foreign power to levy taxes on our economy? Does the government of Canada even have the right to allow this in treaties? Isn’t that a relinquishment of sovereignty?
What next? Would we allow a foreign government to require its expats living in Canada to save all cash register receipts and pay them a sales tax?
Sorry if my terminology is imprecise… but it would be interesting to know whether there would be grounds for a challenge under the Canadian constitution.
What “globe trotting’ Americans living in Canada need to know about filing taxes
Q: I just heard about an upcoming U.S. law that will penalize Americans who are residents of Canada for not having filed U.S. tax forms. I am an 80-year-old American citizen and Canadian resident for 50 years and I have always been told it was not necessary to file due to low income. I am quite concerned and would appreciate some clarification on this matter.
A: The short answer is yes; you must file a U.S. federal tax return, and maybe even a state tax return, in spite of having been in Canada the last 50 years. This has technically always been the case for U.S. citizens abroad but in recent years the IRS has become much tougher in enforcing filing rules for its expats, including those who mistakenly thought they were exempt because of low income. And unfortunately, depending on the rules of your home state, you may not be absolved from filing a state return.
Read more here… http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Talk+Money+What+Americans+living+Canada+need+know+about/8692506/story.html
@Just Me,
Huh? This article says that the low-income filing threshold doesn’t apply to US expats? Is this true? Is there a reference to a US government site saying so?
@Just Me,
No, I don’t think it’s true:
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p54/ch01.html#en_US_2012_publink100047318
@WhatAmI
I guess that is why you don’t take tax advice from newspaper articles… LOL
From: http://www.irs.gov/publications/p54/ch01.html#en_US_2012_publink100047318
Does this mean that the amount earned in a foreign country can be excluded from the gross income amount, thus leaving only earnings from the US?
…thus leaving many / most? (except for passive income in investments, pensions, etc.) with being able to be under the low-income threshold. It says that
@calgary411
I’m no expert, but I looked into this for my mother a couple of years ago. I sent her this in an email but don’t know where I quoted it from:
So, your quote about “income exempt from tax” for calculating the filing threshold does not include OAS or CPP, but it does include your earned income. That earned income is then excluded on your tax return under the FEIE such that you probably pay no tax in the end.
Calgary. Because they don’t write I English, you are unfortunately incorrect.
“Gross income includes any income that you can exclude as foreign earned income…..”
Let’s say your foreign income Is 50K salary and 5kdividends. Your gross income is 55k. You then can deduct 50 under the foreign earned income exclusion.
CPP and OAS are not taxable by the US for duals living in Canada. It is debatable whether they should be included in income and then an equal deduction taken or if you can just ignore them. Ignoring them is simpler.
I’ve done a search but I can’t find anything on this. Does anyone know what to do about rental property expenses that are considered current in your home country but are considered a capital expense in the US (ie: replacing a roof)? This difference means that I have to deduct the expense from my rental income in Canada the year it is replaced but have to deduct it from my income in the US the year I sell the property. Obviously this results in double taxation since I’ll pay higher taxes to the US this year and higher taxes to Canada the year I sell. Since a new roof on an average house is around $5,000 – $7,000, it really is a big deal.
A link to an article that says it is regarding some kind of update on a recent ‘clarification’ by the IRS on its ‘first time abatement’ policy.
See;
http://the-tax-wars.net/2013/06/01/irs-first-time-abate-policy-provides-penalty-relief-in-certain-situations/
“IRS FIRST TIME ABATE POLICY PROVIDES PENALTY RELIEF IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS
Posted on June 1, 2013 by steinbergtaxlaw
The IRS today clarified its policy with regard to abatement of certain penalties for first time offenders. The policy was modified to clarify that relief applies only where the taxpayer is current with all tax filings and tax payments. See IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1…….”
I can’t vouch for the accuracy of this articles’ comments, but just adding it here for consideration, as FTA has come up on IBS before. Perhaps this might be a useful avenue to explore for some readers – at least to read the portion of the IRM cited.
@badger
Thanks for posting that article. Having been born and living in a foreign country and not knowing one has the obligation to file US taxes isn’t on the “reasonable cause” list, although it should.