cross-posted from Citizenshipsolutions dot ca
For Americans, tax season gets even more stressful when they leave the U.S. https://t.co/u58zQy2LmF via @business quotes @Kred65
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) March 30, 2016
Yesterday I was forwarded an email which originated from the U.S.
Consulate in Toronto. The purpose of the email (included at the end of
this post) was to give notice of U.S. tax obligations for U.S. citizens
living outside the United States. In other words, the State Department
is assisting the IRS by notifying Americans abroad of their U.S. tax
filing obligations. Put another way, this email represents:
“Tax Education Outreach” from the IRS delivered by the State
Department”
I do NOT recall this in previous years. That said, this email
notification is extremely significant. It means that the IRS can argue
that those who received this email may well have had notice that they
were required to file U.S. tax returns. Over time, this will increase
awareness of U.S. tax filing obligations. The greater the increase in
awareness of U.S. tax filing obligations, the harder it will be to claim
ignorance of those obligations. (This is in addition to the “Educational
Outreach” coming in the form of FATCA letters from your local bank and your friendly
journalists. In both cases, you are being asked to consider the question
of: “Are you or have you even been an American
citizen?“) Although, this is NOT an immediate problem, it seems
logical that sooner or later it will become more difficult for Americans
abroad to claim ignorance of their U.S. tax filing obligations. This may
have implications for coming into U.S. tax compliance.
Q. Who would have received this email from the U.S.
consulate?
A. Anybody who is on the U.S. Consulate email list.
Q. Who would be on the U.S. Consulate email list?
A. It would include almost anybody who has applied for a U.S. passport.
To put it simply:
One who applies for a U.S. passport is now putting oneself in a
position where one will be told about U.S. tax filing
obligations. Since most Americans abroad need a U.S. passport,
it stands to reason that those who apply for a U.S. passport are
creating a situation where they will be told about U.S. “taxation based
citizenship”. You can see where this is going.
This appears to be the next step in the progression that
includes …
1. State Department asking for your Social Security
Number – For some years the State Department has been required
to ask Passport applicants for their Social Security number. This
requirement is found in S. 6039E of the Internal Revenue Code, which
includes:
(a) General rule Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
any individual who—(1) applies for a United States passport (or a renewal thereof), or
(2) applies to be lawfully accorded the privilege of residing
permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the
immigration laws,
shall include with any such application a statement which includes the
information described in subsection (b).(b) Information to be provided Information required under subsection (a)
shall include—
(1) the taxpayer’s TIN (if any),
(2) in the case of a passport applicant, any foreign country in which
such individual is residing,
(3) in the case of an individual seeking permanent residence,
information with respect to whether such individual is required to file
a return of the tax imposed by chapter 1 for such individual’s most
recent 3 taxable years, and
(4) such other information as the Secretary may prescribe.(c) Penalty
Any individual failing to provide a statement required under subsection
(a) shall be subject to a penalty equal to $500 for each such failure,
unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not
to willful neglect.(d) Information to be provided to Secretary Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, any agency of the United States which collects (or is
required to collect) the statement under subsection (a) shall—
(1) provide any such statement to the Secretary, and
(2) provide to the Secretary the name (and any other identifying
information) of any individual refusing to comply with the provisions of
subsection (a).
Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed to require the
disclosure of information which is subject to section 245A of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (as in effect on the date of the
enactment of this sentence).(e) Exemption
The Secretary may by regulations exempt any class of individuals from
the requirements of this section if he determines that applying this
section to such individuals is not necessary to carry out the purposes
of this section.(Added Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, § 1234(a)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat.
2565; amended Pub. L. 100–647, title I, § 1012(o), Nov. 10, 1988, 102
Stat. 3515.)
Note that S. 6039e does NOT include a provision for the denial of a
passport.
2. The 2015 FAST Act: State Department has the authority to deny
you a passport – The “passport revocation” and “passport
denial” provisions in the FAST Act allow give the Government the right
to deny you a passport for reasons of “tax delinquency”. The provisions
are complicated and will (in the short run) be difficult to enforce.
Nevertheless, the United States has now linked taxation with the right
to have a U.S. passport. This is an extremely dangerous provision.
See the following recent presentation I made on this topic here:
life in the penalty box, and cannot be both U.S. tax
compliant and live a normal life in their country of residence.
Americans abroad, who have no immediate plans to return to the United
States, would be well advised to get a second citizenship/passport. The
acquisition of that second passport may or may not be accompanied by the
relinquishment of U.S. citizenship. It is becoming increasingly
difficult to remain a U.S. citizen and live outside the United States.
More and more people are renouncing U.S. citizenship. They feel that
they have no choice!
On the issue of “renouncing U.S. citizenship” …
“To renounce or not to renounce, whether tis better ” is a difficult question. https://t.co/SlKWmehRxC – to which there is NO happy answer.
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) March 28, 2016
As I recently commented on Rachel Heller’s blog:
@JD and @Rachel
I certainly agree that the question of:
“To renounce or not to renounce, whether tis better …”
is a difficult question.
There is NO answer to this that will not cause pain, hurt, resentment,
anger, and long term pain.When I consider various categories of Americans abroad, I think it is
useful to distinguish between those who have been filing their U.S.
taxes and those who have not.First, Those who have been and are U.S. tax compliant …
Those who have been filing U.S. taxes (and are in the tax system) are in
the worst of all possible situations. By entering the U.S. tax system,
they have voluntarily entered a “fiscal prison” that means that they
will always be disadvantaged relative to others in their country of
residence. Those who have been filing U.S. taxes can be further divided
into:A. Covered expatriates – Subject to the S. 877A Exit
TaxYou will be a “covered expatriate” if you:
– have too much income
– too many assets
– not tax compliant for five years
Those who are “covered expatriates” (particularly those who have
pensions in their country of residence) are in an incredibly difficult
situation. To put it simply, they are likely to have to pay a huge
portion of their life savings to be free of the United States. This is
because of the effects of the S. 877A Exit Tax (Google this). As a rule
of thumb, those Americans abroad with assets that exceed two million USD
(easy to do if you own a house in Toronto, London, Vancouver, etc) will
be very damaged if they “choose to be free”, by leaving the “land of the
free”. I find that most Americans abroad are unaware of this or they
think “that there must be some mistake – this couldn’t possibly be
true”. Make no mistake. The U.S. S.877A Exit tax is designed to impose
confiscatory taxation on (1) assets that exist outside the United States
and (2) that were acquired after the person moved from the United
States.B. Non-covered expatriates – not subject to the S. 877A Exit
TaxIf you check my site at “citizenshipsolutions dot ca” you will see this
defined and discussed. My message for those of you who are non-covered
expatriates is to get out now! Sooner or later you will be “covered”.It’s interesting that those who were “dual citizens from birth” (and meet other criteria)
may be able to escape being a “covered expatriate”. This is interesting
because it means that those who are punished the most by the S. 877A
Exit Tax rules are those who were born ONLY U.S. citizens. You can’t
make this up!Those who have not been and are not U.S. tax compliant
…All of the evidence suggests that Americans abroad who are “U.S. Tax
Compliant” are in a minority. Because of FATCA and fear mongering they
are under pressure to become U.S. tax compliant. Many of them are coming
into U.S. tax compliance. In fact many of them are coming into U.S. tax
compliance for the sole purpose of being able to (1) avoid being a
“covered expatriate” and (2) renounce U.S. citizenship.If you want to see what it means to live as a “U.S. tax compliant”
citizen abroad, and why it is a “fiscal prison”, I invite you to read
the following blog post:How To Live Outside The United States in an FBAR and
FATCA WorldThere is NO “pain free” answer to the problem of attempting to
live as a U.S. citizen outside the United States!
Here is the “IRS Tax Bulletin” from the IRS which was sent to
those who have applied for a U.S. passport …
Actually it’s a pretty good synopsis to get you started. Of course, one
read of this may make you want to avoid getting a U.S. passport forever.
That said, what is clear is that:
When it comes to those born in the United States: Taxation and
citizenship are one and the same!
United States Consulate General Toronto, Canada
Message for U.S. Citizens: IRS 2016 Tax Filing Information
The @USConsToronto is emailing U.S. tax filing information to those #Americansabroad on its mailing list. https://t.co/tGFfmgKciF
— Citizenship Lawyer (@ExpatriationLaw) March 30, 2016
March 29, 2016
Who Must File?
If you are a U.S. citizen or resident alien living or traveling outside
the United States, you generally are required to file income tax
returns, estate tax returns, and gift tax returns, and pay estimated tax
in the same way as those residing in the United States. Your worldwide
income is subject to U.S. income tax, regardless of where you reside.Your income, filing status, and age generally determine whether you must
file an income tax return. Generally, you must file a return if your
gross income from worldwide sources is at least the amount shown for
your filing status in the Filing Requirements table in Chapter 1 of
Publication 54, Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad.When is the 2015 Federal Tax Return Due?
Due date for Form 1040: April 18, 2016
The due date is April 18 instead of April 15 because of the Emancipation
Day holiday in Washington, D.C., – even if you do not live in the
District of Columbia. If you live in Maine or Massachusetts, your
federal tax return is due April 19, 2016, the day after the Patriots’
Day holiday in those states.Possible extensions of time to file tax return:
Automatic extension to June 18, 2016, for taxpayers living outside the
United States and Puerto Rico. No form is required; write “Taxpayer
Resident Abroad” at the top of your tax return.Caution: This extension applies only for filing your tax return, not for
payment. If you owe any taxes, you’re required to pay by April 18, 2016.
Interest and penalties generally will be applied if payment is made
after this date.Extension for all taxpayers to October 18, 2016: File Form 4868.
Caution: This extension applies only for filing your tax return, not for
payment. If you owe any taxes, you’re required to pay by April 18, 2016.
Interest and penalties will generally be applied if payment make after
this date.Other extensions may be available on IRS.gov.
Can I Mail My Return and Payment?
You can mail your tax return and payment using the postal service. If
you mail a return from outside the United States, the date of filing is
the postmark date. However, if you send a payment, separately or with
your return, your payment is not considered received until the date of
actual receipt. You may use approved private delivery services. A list
of approved delivery services is available on IRS.gov.5. Can I Electronically File My Return?
You can prepare and e-file your income tax return, in many cases for
free. Participating software companies make their products available
through the IRS. Many Free File and e-file partners accept a foreign
address. E-File options are listed on IRS.gov.6. What Forms Might I Need?
1040, U.S Individual Income Tax Return
Instructions to Form 1040
1116, Foreign Tax Credit
Instructions to Form 1116
2350, Application for Extension of Time to File U.S. Income Tax Return
(for U.S. citizens and residents abroad)2350 in Spanish
2555, Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
Instructions to Form 2555
2555-EZ, Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
Instructions to Form 2555-EZ
4868, Application for Automatic Extension of Time To File U.S.
Individual Income Tax Return4868 in Spanish
8802, Application for United States Residency Certificate
Instructions to Form 8802
8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets
Instructions to Form 8938
14653, Certification by U.S. Person Residing Outside of the United
States for Streamlined Foreign Offshore ProceduresHow Do I Pay My Taxes?
You must pay your taxes in U.S. dollars.
Direct pay option. You can pay online with a direct transfer from your
U.S. bank account using Direct Pay, the Electronic Federal Tax Payment
System, or by a U.S. debit or credit card. You also can pay by phone
using the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System or by a U.S. debit or
credit card.Foreign wire transfers. If you have a U.S. bank account, you can use:
EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System), or Federal Tax
Application (same-day wire transfer). If you do not have a U.S. bank
account, ask if your financial institution has a U.S. affiliate that can
help you make same-day wire transfers.Foreign electronic payments. International taxpayers who do not have a
U.S. bank account may transfer funds from their foreign bank account
directly to the IRS for payment of their tax liabilities.Are There Other Reporting Requirements?
You also may have to file FinCEN Form 114, Report of Foreign Bank and
Financial Accounts (FBAR), by June 30, 2016.Does the IRS Provide Help in Other Languages?
The IRS provides tax information in Chinese, Korean, Russian, Spanish,
and Vietnamese. Go to www.irs.gov and use the drop down box under
“Languages” on the upper right corner to select your language.Where Can I Get Help?
Contact the International Taxpayer Service Call Center by phone or fax.
The International Call Center is open Monday through Friday, from 6:00
a.m. to 11:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).Tel: 267-941-1000 (not toll-free)
Fax: 267-941-1055
I Received a Notice from the IRS – What Do I Do?
If you receive a notice from the IRS and need to contact the IRS, call
the number listed in the notice or the International Taxpayer Service
Call Center (contact information is listed in the section above).Where Can I Get More Information?
For information, see the IRS website about international taxpayers.
For general information about international taxpayers, see Publication
54, Taxation of U.S. Citizens and Residents Abroad.For information on the Affordable Care Act and taxpayers outside the
United States, see Publication 5187, Health Care Law.I Haven’t Filed All My Tax Returns – What Can I Do?
If you have not filed all the returns that you should have and want to
catch up on your filing obligations, see IRS makes changes to
offshore-programs.Note: The timestamp on this e-mail message may reflect Washington, D.C.,
time, which may differ from local time.
This raises the question we’ve had all along: does a failed attempt at claiming a past relinquishment put you on the IRS radar?
I hear three reactions:
GASP OMG ARGH
ka-ching ka-ching ka-ching
grunt grunt bazinga
@WhatAmI
Not sure there is need for anyone to panic. The State Department clearly has not done this or we would have been hearing from people about it.
The second thing is there is no indication they are forwarding any lists to the IRS. They have supposed to have been sharing 4 pieces of information from passport applications decades ago. They didn’t. And they don’t like sending IRS peoples’ info because it interferes with their work. So I am willing to bet unless they are forced, they won’t.
One thing is extremely clear: STAY AWAY FROM U.S. CONSULATES
Maybe the next time you guys get together to demonstrate against FATCA you should burn passports for the camera or something.
My problem with all of this is that it is 2016 and they are only now getting around to informing people. For the past six years, they have done absolutely nothing except punish the people who came forward early and wonder why everyone has stayed away.
As this all comes together with the revocation of passports for tax liability, it won’t be very long at all until you will have to prove tax compliance in order to renounce, or relinquish. The gates are swinging shut very quickly.
@Publius,
I certainly never heard from the IRS all the problems my wife accounts had for us. We all know that your basically expected to keep up with their stuff yet it’s so complicated the IRS can’t be expected to answer even the most simple question of foreign accounts.
@Yitzi: you already do have to prove compliance to renounce (more or less — you do to get a CLN)
@ Patricia Moon
Could a “covered” (stupid term) Canadian (and Canadian only) end up in a US prison? I don’t think deportation is possible but perhaps rendition is. I have no confidence that the Canadian government will protect its citizens now that Congress has spoken and our new Parliament continues to listen.
@Fred,
I must not understand what you’re saying. I’ve never seen or heard any such thing that one must be tax compliant in order to renounce. Countless people here on IBS have renounced without being tax compliant and received their CLNs. Many have filed with the IRS after renouncing and receiving their CLNs (my mother, for example).
Tax compliance is not a requirement for a CLN. The connections between the renunciation/relinquishment and tax are as follows:
(1) Dept of State
Dept of State basically doesn’t care about one’s tax status as the citizenship itself (and the issuance of the CLN) is not dependent on one being tax compliant.
DoS’s involvement/connection with tax is the following:
(a) At the consulate the person signs DS-4081, Statement of Understanding of Consequences; one of the 12 items on it is Item 10, that renouncing “… may not exempt me from US tax income taxation [etc] …”
(b) The questionnaire, DS-4079, at q. 13 (e) asks “Do you file US income or other tax returns?” The tax question on the DS-4079 is there as an indicator of your ties and connections to the US, which is important if you’re claiming to have relinquished some time ago (in which case you’re trying to illustrate your lack of ties/connections/citizenship behaviour). For renunciations, it’s irrelevant if you have ties/connections/citizenship behaviour or not, so many consulate do not use the 4079 for renunciation, though some do.
(c) Dept of State is to provide IRS with a copy of each CLN they issue as per DoS Interagency Coordination and Reporting Requirements, 7 FAM 1243(a).
(2) IRS
To log out of IRS and avoid covered expatriate status, IRS requires that the person file their exit tax form (8854), their final year form, and the five-years-previous-to-final-year forms, by June 15th of the year following the renunciation (or of notifying DoS of the relinquishment).
FWIW, if a person chooses not to file, the citizenship itself remains terminated and the CLN remains valid.
“The due date is April 18 instead of April 15 because of the Emancipation
Day holiday in Washington, D.C.”
— Oh, the irony!
Again this goes back to my argument nobody can future proof FATCA.
What’s the point of the IRS collecting this data without collection agreements from local governments? That’s why this initial lawsuit must succeed to move this over to a proper political debate.
Without collection agreements (and possibly liens the IRS’ favourite tool), this money will be expensive and hard to collect with US expats fighting tooth and nail to not pay.
In a sense it’s good the US is sending out these emails to advertise the ‘threat’ and people will naturally start researching this problem and hopefully get connected to IBS.
Another thought?
Any hackers out there that can get into the US State Department’s passport system? Hackers seem to have no problem getting into the IRS’ systems.
A USB key with an Excel file in an brown envelope addressed to IBS with no return address would do nicely!
If I was far-off when I first used the term “Taxation-Based Citizenship”, I’m not now. And it’s only going to get worse.
The due date is April 18 instead of April 15 because of the Emancipation
Day holiday in Washington, D.C.
Now that one caught my eye because that is about as ironic as it gets. How about giving the US’ modern day slaves (expats) a little “emancipation”?
Whoops! Should have read the comments before I fired off my own. AnonAnon apparently experienced the same cognitive discord I did.
@Don
Why do you assume the US will seek agreements to collect? I have been reading more and more about these liens and it is not good…………
@EmBee
“Could a “covered” (stupid term) Canadian (and Canadian only) end up in a US prison? I don’t think deportation is possible but perhaps rendition is.”
How exactly could so-called “US Persons” or “covered expatriates” (et al) be extradited from their countries of residence to the United States for past (non-existent) tax delinquencies if they have been living overseas since infancy? A cousin of mine here in Europe, who was born in America but left at the age of 10 months, does not speak any English and has recently married a farmer who has no connections to the States. I honestly cannot get my head around this…
@ Duality
The USA is a criminal state. It will make any law it wants and ignore any law it wants in order to enable its criminal acts. And yes, it’s hard to get one’s head around all this. It would help if I had some confidence that my country would stand firm against the USA but I don’t because it didn’t. Maybe some countries are more courageous than Canada but I don’t know which ones those might be. Even Switzerland with all its previous, commendable independence caved to the US demands.
Another reason to say you don’t have an email address (for gov’t forms). There’s nothing that states an email address is MANDATORY on the form, is there? Or even that were you to give one, that it’s still valid & in use by the time they decide to “contact” you?
Kind of a sketchy way to claim they’ve “given notice”? I mean, it’s hardly like you’ve been served?
@Patricia Moon, “Why do you assume the US will seek agreements to collect? I have been reading more and more about these liens and it is not good………”
It is foreign debt which is unenforceable outside the USA unless a local Court effectively gives that foreign debt
The alternative is that they get a bank with branches in Country A and the USA to enforce the debt. Ergo, avoid banks with business in the USA.
At this point to be honest any such debt would not be collectible.
@EmBee
I found this last nite but I cannot at the moment find the link. It is interesting that you would ask and I just happened to come across it beforehand!
(looking for link)
The protocol amending the treaty on extradition was signed on January 11, 1988 and came into force in 1991. The amendment includes revenue offences on the list of extraditable offenses under the treaty on extradition. Extradition under the treaty is limited to offences punishable in both countries by a term of imprisonment or detention of one year.This means that it must be a men’s rea offence which in effect, means that the offence must be tax evasion. Subparagraph 19(c) of Information Circular 75-16R states that where taxpayers attempt to avoid paying taxes by placing their income or assets beyond the reach of the CCRA, the taxpayers have committed a criminal offence pursuant to section 239 of the Income Tax Act. The circular continues to state that such action is an indictable offence at the election of the Attorney General and as such is punishable by a term of imprisonment of not less than 2 months and not more than 5 years.
I can see this is an older reference using Canada Customs and Revenue Agency-should help me figure out where I found it.
Hmm. Tax compliance is currently not a requirement for a CLN, but I wonder if that’s going to change.
Rachel Heller tells the story of a US-tainted PILOT. In fact the IRS targets US-tainted flight attendants too.
To those who doubt that the IRS would spend its limited resources persecuting MINNOWS, take a look at these:
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/rogerswilliammemo.TCM.WPD.pdf
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/scottmarya.sum.WPD.pdf
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/letourneau.TCM.WPD.pdf
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/ready.sum.WPD.pdf
US Tax court understands US exceptionalism perfectly.