Does anyone know of cases where “US persons” at risk from the IRS have run into trouble entering the US? Have any of you had a bad experience?
The last time I entered the US was nearly three years ago and I was seriously hassled at the border crossing (we were driving) because I did not have a US passport. I have not dared try to enter the US since then. I do know a few people who seem to have come and gone without any questions asked.
Thank you.
If clicking on a comment link in the sidebar brings you to the wrong page in the comment stream, click here to go directly to the most recent comment page.
I think we may have discovered the DYI CLN, BC Doc! (At least as far as we can convince the bank it’s a reasonable explanation).
I don’t think it will work. TD’s website says they require a CLN for customers born in U.S. They have not yet asked where I was born, but I closed my 34 year account and moved to a credit union which has made it clear they do not care where I was born.
@Blaze
When I transferred my investments from MD Management to RBC Direct Investments many years ago, RBC “comped me” for the account closure fees that MD Management charged me when I closed out my accounts. Perhaps the big banks will start comping their “US person” customers for the CLN fee– “bring your assets over to our bank and we will cover the cost of your CLN.” What a marketing angle…
Without a doubt, the CLN is the gold standard for documenting loss of USC. Unfortunately, the gold standard was invented, patented, and is now marketed and exclusively sold by the USG. And the price point and hassle factor is too high for many folks. Many people, myself included, will refuse to play the game. The requirement to obtain a CLN for banking purposes seems ludicrous if one is able to document loss of USC another way. Would a Canadian bank force a refugee who fled Iran to seek official documentation from the Iranian government proving they were no longer an Iranian citizen? Even as former US citizens, our treatment is exceptional. I don’t want to be exceptional. I just want to be Canadian.
@Bubblebustin
I agree– I think the link you found would be good to call out for discussion. I think we could have some fun with it!
@BC Doc TD did not seem to mind in the least that they were losing a long time Canada Trust customer. In fact, I think they are relieved not to have to deal with me on FATCA. They never asked me where I was born, but my Branch Manager and other staff were aware that I am originally from the U.S.
Of course, I have been very visible locally and nationally about FATCA so I think “America’s Most Convenient Bank” simply did not want the hassle of dealing with me when they get around to formally asking The Question.
Their Customer Support people refused to tell me why TD will not accept a “reasonable explanation” of why a customer does not have a CLN as contained in the FATCA Regs.
I advised someone in BC who became a Canadian citizen in 1972 how he could get a copy of the renunciation oath in his Canadian citizenship file. CIBC accepted this from him as documentation that he is not a U.S. Person.
It boggles my mind that TD will not accept my renunciation signed and witnessed by a Canadian citizenship official in 1973. As I told my Branch Manager, TD is far more concerned about their American operations and a foreign law than they are about their loyal long time Canadian citizen customers.
TD has destroyed the trust I had Canada Trust doe decades. I feel ill every time I go by my old branch or any other TD Branch.
When my sister was here from Pennsylvania a few months ago before I closed my accounts, she went with me to TD. When she saw the TD sign, she immediately said “Oh. TD Ameritrade.” It seems their ads are all over on U.S. television. Not surprising considering TD now has more branches in the U.S. than they they do in Canada and they are the third largest bank in Manhattan. That tells us why they were so quick to sell
us out.
Following up on Bubblebustin’s link/hoping to give Bubblebustin’s find a bump, I am posting the following link:
http://archive.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/publishedopinions/v14/14_BAR_(D)_288_(1987).pdf
The document is a State Dept appellate review of a gentleman who lost his USC in part due to travelling into the U.S. on his Belgian passport with visitor visas.
For those of us who are “self-relinquishers”, I don’t think it can hurt to create a paper trail/documentation that we are presenting ourselves to the U.S. as non-nationals.
@BC_DOC, that wouldn’t work after 1990, when the DOS changed the administrative presumption. Absent express intention like signing a DS-4079, they won’t recognize loss except for treason, taking a policy position in a foreign gov’t, or serving in a hostile army.
Thanks B. For estate planning purposes here in Canada, though, I may swear an affidavit stating I relinquished my USC when I became Canadian. The printout of subsequent travel to the U.S. as a non-US national would be included in the in the same folder to further demonstrate my claim. When I’m gone and pushing up dafodils, the last thing I would want is the estate attorney and accountant deciding that I was a “U.S. Person” and involving the IRS in the estate settlement.
Interestingly, the last time I travelled to the U.S., the border agent stamped my passport with a visitor visa before admitting me. Eventually, the expired passport with the visitor visa stamp will go in the same file.
BC_Doc That might be OK provided you don’t go with a big international accounting firm or trust co. They all have US business and have a strong inclination to follow US rules. Stick to a local accountant and lawyer.
I agree with Duke. I know of an elderly widow who was terrorized by TD and Price Waterhouse to become compliant even though she had been a Canadian citizen since 1974 and should not be considered to be a U.S. Person.
A mutual friend told me recently she is now giving her assets to her church and preferred charities so the IRS can’t try to seize them.
I pleaded with her not to file with the IRS. John Richardson was so incensed at her story that he was prepared to come to London at no charge to her to help her. But, PW and TD had so convinced her she was a criminal that she would not agree to even speak to John. She is also no longer willing to speak with me. Ps he simply says “It’s too late. I’m screwed.” Our mutual friends says she is anxious and depressed.
So, beware of the large firms. On the other hand, my independent lawyer and my accountant (who is also Executor of my Estate and my Power of Attorney) have direct orders from me that under no circumstances should anything be filed with IRS. They both agree with me that, as a Canadian citizen, I have no obligation to follow a foreign law.
Addition to above: The elderly widow owed nothing to the IRS, but she paid thousands to Price Waterhouse for the terror they instilled in her.
Thx Duke. Thx Blaze. My attorney is local– he’s aware of my background. I need to have a chat with him and discuss affidavit option to see if he is comfortable with that option as his firm would be who my estate would likely use for settlement upon my demise.
I have used the same accountant at KPMG for years. We have had off the record discussions about my US background previously. Officially, KPMG knows this client as being Canadian only. I do plan on having another off the record discussion with my accountant about the affidavit idea. As per your sage advice Duke, if she isn’t comfortable with this method of documenting non-US nationality, I would certainly bail and switch to a local firm.
Cheers,
BC Doc
@BC Doc, if push comes to shove, I will be self relinquishing as well. I have lived my entire adult life in Canada and will not subscribe to tax policies of a foreign country. What would you think about setting up a “self-certifying” thread here at IBS? I think you have done the most work on this front and others, including myself, could benefit from a centralized repository of information and ideas.
I am an Australian citizen with a US place of birth. I have travelled on my Australian passport only since becoming Australian. My US passport ran out in 2002. I have not used it since arriving back in Australia in 1993. I have not touch foot on US soil since 1993 either. I have friends in Toronto and family in the Northeast of the USA. Would it be safe for me to visit my family in the US using my Australian passport by crossing the Canadian/US border by land after visiting friends in Canada? I do not have a CLN and I am not tax compliant with the US – I cannot afford to be complaint with the IRS or to get a CLN. Am I banned from ever going to the US?
Almost certainly. Many many Brockers have travelled to the US in the same circumstances. Some repeatedly. There is a small chance you might be warned that, in future, you should have a US passport or asked why you don’t have one.
Do Australians have Visa waiver?
@Duke of Devon
Yes, Australians do.
http://canberra.usembassy.gov/visa_waiver_prog.html
So it safer to enter the US via the US/Canadian border than by air. I just don’t want to get stuffed like Boris Johnson.
Hi Ellen,
I’ve travelled in by plane and car. Method do of transit hasn’t made a difference. I’ve declared myself as Cnd and travel on a Cnd passport. I was asked once about my place of birth and told the border agent I was relinquishing. I think as long as you present yourself as confident and polite, you shouldn’t have a problem. That, and maintain your position. FYI, like you, I left the U.S. in 1993 and haven’t filed w/the IRS since I left.
BC Doc
Hi BC Doc
Actually I left the US in 1976 when I was a kid with my family and then tried to live in the US in the early 1990’s. I discovered I couldn’t get health insurance in the US because of pre-existing medical conditions, so I left the US for good and became an Australian citizen.
EllenDownUnder. If you’re still there, Sounds like you relinquished when you became Australian in the nineties. If that’s the case, you qualify for a CLN without having to pay a fee and have no tax filing obligations.
Just who had jurisdiction over US border officers in Canada?
…”However, Canada would have jurisdiction over “serious cases of on-duty conduct, notably cases of murder, aggravated sexual assault and terrorism,” in cases where U.S. officials agree such charges are warranted under U.S. law and Canada has asked Washington to waive its jurisdiction.
In other serious cases of on-duty conduct, the U.S. would have jurisdiction but Canada could ask the Americans to waive it.”…
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/under-new-pact-u-s-border-officers-could-face-canadian-justice-for-serious-crimes-1.2344241
Wondering posted the following comment with links to the TECS manual on another thread – it’s definintely relevant here. Thanks, Wondering!
all the more reason to never cross the border into THAT country ever again.
Recent land crossing for an evening out, as one individual of two couples. The only questions were “where are you going?”, and “Will you all be returning home?”. Thought that one was a bit odd. The other 3 were Canadian-born Canadians.
This was a second land crossing, post-CLN. First post-8854, with nasty statement attached sent only to Treasury. No tax or FBAR forms ever filed.
@Duke of Devon
I am too afraid to go anywhere near an American consulate – they may say I would have to renounce. Then they would know my address. And then the IRS will be after me even though they won’t get any taxes out of me. The Australian Taxation Office isn’t getting very much taxes out of me either. The banks as of yet don’t know I was born in the USA. I am not about to tell them. If a bank teller ask me if am an American I would just tell them that I lived in Canada as a kid (which is true).
@EllenDownunder.
Your reluctance to approach a US Consulate is not unfounded. I found it to be an adversarial adventure, where they did indeed push me towards renouncing. They called me out of the blue on two occasions (probably recorded) and their line of questioning seemed that they were more interested in gathering evidence than being of assistance. You are probably not being paranoid if you’re worried about drawing attention to yourself.
However, when it comes to crossing the border, what others have said is probably true. I entered as many as 8 times with my Aussie passport and visa waiver with no incident. I don’t know if I would have gotten away with it after they warned me and put me on the system. If you’re not on the system, you only need to look them straight in the eye and tell them you’re Australian. This shouldn’t be hard if it’s something you believe. Bottom line is, you will most likely be warned before you get into trouble, and you’ll know when your cover is blown.
Also, I opened any bank accounts with a Queensland drivers license, so time will tell if that flies under the radar. I sincerely doubt that individual tellers are in charge of weeding out expats, but I could be wrong.