Steven J. Mopsick, 30 year IRS vet, commented on the procedures announced by the IRS 26 June 2012:
NEW FILING PROCEDURE
FOR AMERICANS ABROAD: TOO LITTLE BUT NOT TOO LATE
On June 26, 2012, the IRS announced a new filing compliance procedure for non-resident U.S taxpayers. The procedure provides that current non-residents including dual citizens, who have not filed U.S. income tax and information returns, may file three years of delinquent tax returns and six years of delinquent FBAR’s without fear of IRS punishment. Provided the delinquent returns are (a)“simple returns,” (b) the IRS determines that the taxpayer’s package presents a “low level of compliance risk” (c) and the returns show less than $1,500 of tax due for each year, the taxpayer can expect an expedited review process possibly resulting in no assertion of penalties or further follow up procedures. The notice makes it clear that this new procedure is not a substitute for a voluntary disclosure nor the more formal OVDI 27.5% tribute program and that if a taxpayer has a well-founded worry about the risk of criminal prosecution he better consult a lawyer.
The new program is a good idea and is perhaps more notable for what it says between the lines rather than in its explicit details: the program says to me what I have been saying on these pages since February, namely the IRS has the ability to use common sense and good judgment in culling out the “no brainer” situations where the “one size fits all” approach of the OVDI program just doesn’t make sense. Also, it is an admission on the part of the IRS that they didn’t think the OVDI program through carefully enough to anticipate what must be an overwhelming flood of OVDI applications which are now clogging the system, many of which really do not belong in the program in the first place.
For all the griping and skeptical comments so far, there is clearly good news here because it is a great chance for some people with simple returns to get an almost free pass to the world of future compliance assuming they really care about their status with the IRS.
The problem is the new program will only apply to a tiny fraction of Americans abroad with real tax issues. Moreover, many of the folks who qualify to file “simple returns” with little tax due already have one foot out the door when it comes to American tax compliance and could care less about what the IRS thinks. Also, Petros and other Brockers should feel some sense of vindication because (1) it is an IRS admission that its menacing public pronouncements notwithstanding, its OVDI “bluff” has been called and (2) it is a public acknowledgement that the IRS has known all along that it “ just had to do something” to tell the world that there should be, and can be a mechanism available for low level IRS workers to use common sense and good judgment when they process simple cases.
But the IRS is fooling itself if it thinks that many people are going to jump on the band wagon as a result of the June 26 announcement. Many Americans abroad will read the new program as a better chance to argue “reasonable cause” or “no tax avoidance motive” at some time in the future, if and when the IRS ever catches up with them. The reason is, the IRS will find it hard to argue that the publication of an obscure announcement in tiny print on its web site is sufficient notice to the entire world-wide expatriate community that they are now on notice that they better act now to get into compliance or risk a heavy hammer if they don’t develop a healthy fear of what the IRS could possibly do to them.
It should be clear to even the most paranoid expatriates that ignoring the new program will in no way increase their chances of the IRS opening a criminal investigation against them, nor should anyone believe that the failure to elect the “simple returns” procedure or the draconian 27.5% tribute program will result in the IRS throwing the penalty book at them in the face of the remote possibility that they will get caught by the IRS at some time in the future.
The new procedure is “too little” because my guess is when the IRS announces the details, “simple returns” are likely to include those with only a schedule A and B and not much more. If there is a small amount of “economic activity” in the United States, if a taxpayer is doing business through a corporation or partnership, if there is a relatively small amount of US source income, a legitimate trust or foundation to support an elderly relative, a foreign mutual fund or PFIC, a residency or filing status issue, or any complication at all which would cause a return to require a regular revenue agent’s attention (as opposed to a lower level office auditor) those taxpayers will have to go through the rigors of the OVDI 27.5% tribute program or a noisy disclosure outside the program if the practitioner has the guts to stand fast and look the IRS straight in the eye.
The new program is not “too late” because it says finally, that (1) there is in fact a de minimus amount of unreported income which will be excused contrary to the OVDI FAQ’s, (2) a noisy disclosure outside the 27.5% tribute program will be ok to show reasonable cause for failure to file income and information returns AND FBAR’s, and (3) legitimate retirement and savings plans are not at risk for IRS abuse or confiscation.
The new program is a good start. We hope that in the future the IRS will continue to issue further guidance and be a bit more broad-minded when defining “no brainers.”
@ij: I sympathize your suffering. What a horrible law FBAR is? No civilized or even third world democratic nation enacts a law that dolls out same punishment to J-walkers and arm-robbers. How does a new immigrant know about FBAR, when even 90% of US citizens filing tax returns all their lives don’t know about it. Even tax experts didn’t know about FBAR until 2009. What kind people deliberately determine to implement such law to extract money from innocent immigrants? It is horrible to use a law intended to track terrorists and money laundering of organized criminals to prosecute innocent and honest immigrants, most of them don’t owe taxes (due to foreign tax credits). It is a trap and scam. Only people suffering are honest people like you, who try to correct your innocent error by entering in to OVDI. Based on number of FBAR filings, I feel over 90% of immigrants who have foreign accounts just ignoring the threats (may be hiding the money in the name of family members or in real-estate).
@Bharat, Thanks.. .
I guess the only way out is to opt-out. That will save some hard-earn money and clear name as well.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/26/pf/taxes/irs-offshore-tax-cheats/index.htm
I am one of those 33,000 offshore tax cheats. If this $5 billion collected are tax, that would be $150,000 each. I only owe $3000. That means I am a super minnow. Or this $5billions are in lieu of penalty (5%, 12.5%, 20% and 25%). If so, this story is really misleading !
*@ij. I did the math as well and could not believe that the
average was $150,000. That means that many people had very high
penalties. Not very reassuring!
@Dianne,
I am thinking of opting-out. I do not want be part of this statistics. I wish I could have cheated 150K (that means I would be very rich!).
Staying the program and paying the high penalty would reward me a cheat. A pathetic cheat of $3000 tax in 8 years. What an insult ! If I could cheat, I would cheat like Tim Geithner.
ij,
You are right on point. CNN and the rest of the media is just terribly sloppy with their narratives and headlines. “Cheats” gathers eyeballs and sells ads, and the level of discourse on the comments is discouraging, although there were some reasoned answers.
Yes there were some homeland whale cheats, but again, as we know none of these lazy ass journalist ever ask questions about the Minnow Whale ratio, what was the compliance percentage improvements, or what was penalties and what portion was actual taxes collected and will be re-occurring. I guess we are stuck with it.
I am outraged for you ij, and wish you the best. I know you are approaching your “cat surgery” decision point, and while Opting Out is morally the high ground, I can also understand you just wanting to end this all nonsense, pay your assigned penalty (absent the RSSP) and moving on. This is the plea bargain equivalent that our system forces on minnows, sadly enough.
Ij,
Not that it matters, as the article is now cold, but this po’d me enough to post a comment criticizing the CNN for the press release scribe journalism they engage in, and lack of any questions. I emphasized some of the minnow immigrant issues, just for you. But it matters not. They won’t read it, and don’t care. Made me feel better, marginally! 🙂
I can never grow a skin thick enough to take being called a cheat when I know that I am the one who’s been cheated.
I haven’t seen any data for what portion of the haul is attributed to those qualifying for 5% and probably won’t for quite sometime as Canada’s OVDI’s are still sitting in Austin. Even though my husband and I are calculated to pay 6 figures in tax and penalties under OVDI, we are no more a cheat than anyone else was who got misled into the program. For calculation purposes, our ‘tribute’ would have totalled $490,000 at 25%, but would have seen us make a very different decision. (Instead we chose to have ourselves smacked with a carrot). The tax and penalties are on the sale of our principal residence, only taxed by the US because Canada didn’t!!! Fortunately for us TAS has given us hope that the penalties will be eliminated under the provisions of the IRM (Internal Revenue Manual). Cold comfort really, as far as my feelings toward those who brought us this debacle go.