Yes, it’s hard to believe. For a link to the U.N. resolution confirming this check out:
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CONDEMNS THE USE OF A DIASPORA #TAX for Eritrea!US Taxing #Expats is ok.Hegemonic chutzpah!!bit.ly/w2db3f
— Marvin Van Horn (@FATCA_Fallout) January 30, 2012
The above tweet has a link to the actual U.N. resolution. Here is some commentary that I received on this issue:
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CONDEMNS THE USE
OF A DIASPORA TAX!
DEAR OVERSEAS AMERICAN FRIENDS,
How truly extraordinary!!
As you read down through the text of this recent UN Security Council Resolution, adopted on 5 December 2011, try to avoid laughing out loud when you discover that the U.S. Government actually:
10. Condemns the use of the ‘Diaspora tax’ on Eritrean diaspora by the Eritrean Government to destabilize the Horn of Africa region or violate relevant resolutions, including 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009) and 1907 (2009), including for purposes such as procuring arms and related materiel for transfer to armed opposition groups or providing any services or financial transfers provided directly or indirectly to such groups, as outlined in the findings of the Somalia/Eritrea Monitoring Group in its 18 July 2011 report (S/2011/433), and decides that Eritrea shall cease these practices;
and
11. Decides that Eritrea shall cease using extortion, threats of violence, fraud and other illicit means to collect taxes outside of Eritrea from its nationals or other individuals of Eritrean descent, decides further that States shall undertake appropriate measures to hold accountable, consistent with international law, those individuals on their territory who are acting, officially or unofficially, on behalf of the Eritrean government or the PFDJ contrary to the prohibitions imposed in this paragraph and the laws of the States concerned, and calls upon States to take such action as may be appropriate consistent with their domestic law and international relevant instruments, including the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to prevent such individuals from facilitating further violations;
WHAT? They were actually condemned by the U.S. Government for using a “diaspora tax”?? and for using threats, etc, to collect taxes outside of Eritrea from its nationals or other individuals of Eritrean descent?
Apparently only one country in the world is supposed to be allowed to impose and vigorously enforce such a tax on its diaspora today, and it can then of course use the resultant revenue for whatever purposes it wants, including destabilizing any countries it might be so tempted to do, too.
ERITREA:
TEXT OF RESOLUTION 2023 (2011)
AS ADOPTED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL
Dec 5, 2011
The Security Council,
Recalling its previous resolutions and statements of its President concerning the situation in Somalia and the border dispute between Djibouti and Eritrea, in particular its resolutions 751 (1992), 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009), 1916 (2009), 1998 (2011), and 2002 (2011), and its statements of 18 May 2009 (S/PRST/2009/15), 9 July 2009 (S/PRST/2009/19), 12 June 2008 (S/PRST/2008/20),
Reaffirming its respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political independence and unity of Somalia , Djiboutiand Eritrea , respectively, as well as that of all other States of the region,
Reiterating its full support for the Djibouti Peace Process and the Transitional Federal Charter which provide the framework for reaching a lasting political solution in Somalia, and welcoming the Kampala Accord of 9 June 2011 and the roadmap agreed on 6 September 2011,
Calling upon all States in the region to peacefully resolve their disputes and normalize their relations in order to lay the foundation for durable peace and lasting security in the Horn of Africa, and encouraging these States to provide the necessary cooperation to the African Union in its efforts to resolve these disputes,
Reiterating its grave concern about the border dispute between Eritrea and Djibouti and the importance of resolving it, calling upon Eritrea to pursue with Djibouti, in good faith, the scrupulous implementation of the 6 June 2010 Agreement, concluded under the auspices of Qatar, in order to resolve their border dispute and consolidate the normalization of their relations, and welcoming the mediation efforts of Qatar, the continued engagement of regional actors, the African Union, the United Nations,
Noting the letter of the Permanent Representative of Djibouti to the United Nations of 6 October 2011 (S/2011/617) which informs the Secretary General of the escape of two Djiboutian prisoners of war from an Eritrean prison, while noting that the Government of Eritrea has to this date denied detaining any Djiboutian prisoners of war,
Expressing grave concern at the findings of the Somalia/Eritrea Monitoring Group report of 18 July 2011 (S/2011/433), that Eritrea has continued to providing political, financial, training and logistical support to armed opposition groups, including Al-Shabaab, engaged in undermining peace, security and stability in Somalia and the region,
Condemning the planned terrorist attack of January 2011 to disrupt the African Union summit in Addis Ababa , as expressed by the findings of the Somalia/Eritrea Monitoring Group report,
Taking note of the Decision of the African Union Assembly of Heads of State and Government held in January 2010 and the Communiqué of the AU Peace and Security Council held on 8 January 2010, welcoming the adoption, by the United Nations (UN) Security Council on 23 December 2009, of resolution 1907 (2009), which imposes sanctions on Eritrea, for, among other things, providing political, financial, and logistical support to armed groups engaged in undermining peace and reconciliation in Somalia and regional stability; stressing the need to pursue vigorously the effective implementation of Resolution 1907 (2009), and expressing its intention to apply targeted sanctions against individuals and entities if they meet the listing criteria set out in paragraph 15 of resolution 1907 (2009) and paragraph 8 of resolution 1844 (2008),
Noting the decision by the 18th Extraordinary Session of the Assembly of the Heads of State and Government of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), calling on the Security Council to take measures to ensure that Eritrea desists from its destabilization activities in the Horn of Africa,
Noting the letter from Eritrea (S/2011/652), containing a document responding to the report of Somali/Eritrea monitoring group,
Strongly condemning any acts by Eritrea that undermine peace, security and stability in the region and calling on all Member State to comply fully with the terms of the arms embargo imposed by paragraph 5 of resolution 733 (1992), as elaborated and amended by subsequent resolutions,
Determining that Eritrea’s failure to fully comply with resolutions 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009) and its actions undermining peace and reconciliation in Somalia and the Horn of Africa region as well as the dispute between Djibouti and Eritrea constitute a threat to international peace and security,
Mindful of its primary responsibility under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security,
Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,
1. Condemns the violations by Eritrea of Security Council resolutions 1907 (2009), 1862 (2009) and 1844 (2008) by providing continued support to armed opposition groups, including Al-Shabaab, engaged in undermining peace and reconciliation in Somalia and the region;
2. Supports the call by the African Union for Eritrea to resolve its border disputes with its neighbours and calls on the parties to peacefully resolve their disputes, normalize their relations and to promote durable peace and lasting security in the Horn of Africa, and encourages the parties to provide the necessary cooperation to the African Union in its efforts to resolve these disputes;
3. Reiterates that all member States, including Eritrea , shall comply fully with the terms of the arms embargo imposed by paragraph 5 of resolution 733 (1992), as elaborated and amended by subsequent resolutions;
4. Reiterates that Eritrea shall fully comply with resolution 1907 (2009) without any further delay and stresses the obligation of all States to comply with the measures imposed by resolution 1907 (2009);
5. Notes Eritrea’s withdrawal of its forces following the stationing of Qatari observers in the disputed areas along the border with Djibouti, calls upon Eritrea to engage constructively with Djibouti to resolve the border dispute, and reaffirms its intention to take further targeted measures against those who obstruct implementation of resolution 1862 (2009);
6. Demands that Eritrea shall make available information pertaining to Djiboutian combatants missing in action since the clashes of 10 to 12 June, 2008 so that those concerned may ascertain the presence and condition of Djiboutian prisoners of war;
7. Demands Eritrea to cease all direct or indirect efforts to destabilize States, including through financial, military, intelligence and non-military assistance, such as the provision of training centres, camps and other similar facilities for armed groups, passports, living expenses, or travel facilitation;
8. Calls upon all States, in particular States of the region, in order to ensure strict implementation of the arms embargo established by paragraphs 5 and 6 of resolution 1907 (2009), to inspect in their territory, including seaports and airports, in accordance with the National authorities and legislation and consistent with international law, all cargo bound to or from Eritrea, if the State concerned has information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo contains items the supply, sale, transfer or export of which is prohibited by paragraphs 5 or 6 of resolution 1907 (2009), and recalls the obligations contained in paragraphs 8 and 9 of resolution 1907 (2009) with respect to the discovery of items prohibited by paragraphs 5 or 6 of resolution 1907 (2009) and paragraph 5 of resolution 733 (1992) as elaborated and amended by subsequent resolutions;
9. Expresses its intention to apply targeted sanctions against individuals and entities if they meet the listing criteria set out in paragraph 15 of resolution 1907 (2009) and paragraph 1 of resolution 2002 (2011) and requests the Committee to review, as a matter of urgency, listing proposals from Member States;
10. Condemns the use of the ‘Diaspora tax’ on Eritrean diaspora by the Eritrean Government to destabilize the Horn of Africa region or violate relevant resolutions, including 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009) and 1907 (2009), including for purposes such as procuring arms and related materiel for transfer to armed opposition groups or providing any services or financial transfers provided directly or indirectly to such groups, as outlined in the findings of the Somalia/Eritrea Monitoring Group in its 18 July 2011 report (S/2011/433), and decides that Eritrea shall cease these practices;
11. Decides that Eritrea shall cease using extortion, threats of violence, fraud and other illicit means to collect taxes outside of Eritrea from its nationals or other individuals of Eritrean descent, decides further that States shall undertake appropriate measures to hold accountable, consistent with international law, those individuals on their territory who are acting, officially or unofficially, on behalf of the Eritrean government or the PFDJ contrary to the prohibitions imposed in this paragraph and the laws of the States concerned, and calls upon States to take such action as may be appropriate consistent with their domestic law and international relevant instruments, including the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to prevent such individuals from facilitating further violations;
12. Expresses concern at the potential use of the Eritrean mining sector as a financial source to destabilize the Horn of Africa region, as outlined in the Final Report of the Monitoring Group (S/2011/433), and calls on Eritrea to show transparency in its public finances, including through cooperation with the Monitoring Group, in order to demonstrate that the proceeds of these mining activities are not being used to violate relevant resolutions, including 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009) and this resolution;
13. Decides that States, in order to prevent funds derived from the mining sector of Eritrea contributing to violations of resolutions 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009) or this resolution, shall undertake appropriate measures to promote the exercise of vigilance by their nationals, persons subject to their jurisdiction and firms incorporated in their territory or subject to their jurisdiction that are doing business in this sector in Eritrea including through the issuance of due diligence guidelines, and requests in this regard the Committee, with the assistance of the Monitoring Group, to draft guidelines for the optional use of Member States;
14. Urges all States to introduce due diligence guidelines to prevent the provision of financial services, including insurance or re-insurance, or the transfer to, through, or from their territory, or to or by their nationals or entities organized under their laws (including branches abroad), or persons or financial institutions in their territory, of any financial or other assets or resources if such services, assets or resources, including new investment in the extractives sector, would contribute to Eritrea’s violation of relevant resolutions, including 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009) and this resolution;
15. Calls upon all States to report to the Security Council within 120 days on steps taken to implement the provisions of this resolution;
16. Decides to further expand the mandate of the Monitoring Group re‑established by resolution 2002 (2011) to monitor and report on implementation of the measures imposed in this resolution and undertake the tasks outlined below:
(a) Assist the Committee in monitoring the implementation of the measures imposed in paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 above, including by reporting any information on violations;
(b) Consider any information relevant to paragraph 6 above that should be brought to the attention of the Committee;
17. Urges all States, relevant United Nations bodies and other interested parties, to cooperate fully with the Committee and the Monitoring Group, including by supplying any information at their disposal on the implementation of the measures decided in resolution 1844 (2008), resolution 1907 (2009) and this resolution, in particular incidents of non-compliance;
18. Affirms that it shall keep Eritrea’s actions under continuous review and that it shall be prepared to adjust the measures, including through their strengthening, modification or lifting, in light of Eritrea’s compliance with the provisions of resolutions 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009) and this resolution;
19. Requests the Secretary-General to report within 180 days on Eritrea ‘s compliance with the provisions of resolutions 1844 (2008), 1862 (2009), 1907 (2009) and this resolution;
20. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
Thanks for posting that…
Hegemonic chutzpah!
Please throw that back in their face as much as you possibly can!
I am so flabbergasted that the US supported this proposal condemning Eretria for subjecting its diaspora to home country taxation while at the same time the US subjects its dispora to exactly the same kind of taxation, that I just can’t believe it.
The Erietrian Government is simply following the example established by the US Government which is always attempting to encourage other nations to follow the example of the US.
And why, may I ask did all of the other member nations of the Security Council vote in favor of this resolution while totally ignoring the US policy of doing the exact same thing it condemns when the Eretrians follow the US example?
“Don’t do as I do; do as I say.” That’s the motto of the US when it comes to tax policy.
Great research MVH!
Imagine that, a UN Security Council Resolution condemning Eritrea’s use of “Diaspora Tax?”
The contradictory “double-think” of the USG knows no boundaries. Even George Orwell would be amazed.
Th UN Resolution is great material (along with a ton of other stuff) to put into a serious open letter that needs to get published in a major news publication. The question now is, how to make it happen?
@Cato
Yes, we could certainly use your help.
I can work on a draft. But there are much better writers on this forum than I. Moreover, I am buried with work for the next two to three months. Hence my short inputs of quotes.
Therefore, I propose making it a group effort. Drafts can be posted right here.
@CATO
Not such great research. That belongs to others. I am just on the right end of receiving a good email, and Renounce is excellent at putting things up! I am a bit to slow and ponderous, and then there is that garden that is taking up my LCUs! 🙂
I think the target sources of media should be the WSJ and/or Economist.
This dual citizenship thing is totally unworkable when a country can become so hostile toward it’s former citizens the way the US has now.
This should be resolved like a child custody case where sole custody must go to the most responsible parent.
First we have Canada (we’ll call her Mom)
– she’s very good with money, she pays your healthcare bills, unemployment benefits, old age benefits, sends fire fighters when your house is on fire, sends the cops when bad guys show up, will take care of you no matter what!
Then we have USA (we’ll call him Dad)
– he’s got a drug habit that’s caused him to rack up all kinds of debts that he’ll probably never pay off without robbing all the neighbors, he abuses you verbally calling you a tax evader threatening to empty all your bank accounts, once you’re broke you’ll never hear from him again.
Hmmm, tough choice which parent really should have custody of you?
It is so ironic when one considers that the U.S. is the biggest arms exporter in the world. Real hypocrisy. So ironic that they chide Eritiria for using, extortions and threats, to collect an extraterritorial tax.
I would call it incredible, but–sadly–nothing the U.S. does is incredible to me anymore.
How would we go about trying to get a UN resolution to protect our rights?!? We need to dream big!
Renounce, Renounce, Renounce!
Its the only way to get away from this diabolical tyranny and only real way to make a statement.
Hancock
The US is like a hypocritical parent ordering their children to “Do as I say, not as I do.” Their smug sense of moral superiority thrives not because they are right, but because they choose willful ignorance over inconvenient truth, time and time again. Money, religion and power have combined to destroy nearly everything that once made America a beacon of hope. Greed is NOT good, and the end game of its rampant destruction is playing out.
Why should we be surprised to see such an absurd statement about Eritrea coming from the US when they literally know not what they do? They are sleepwalking into global catastrophe, and dragging the rest of us along for yet another ride into hell.
I’m flabbergasted
@Hancock. If you renounce then they may still try to get you for back taxes “owed”. I say fight. Keep putting pressure on the politicians. Repeal FATCA, FBAR, and cancel double taxation.
This whole mess reminds me of the internment of the US persons of Japanese origin and confiscation of their assets.
It is indeed a fact that the US Consulate will not and does not issue a Certificate of Renunciation until the IRS confirms that all US taxes and related fines and penalties have been paid. This, I presume, is the primary reason why the approval process is not immediate but takes such a long time.
Pay the taxes, then “Renounce” the next day!
@John Hancock: that requires you to figure out how much you owe. The IRS can’t even be bothered to send out international penalty notices in a timely manner!
I had a dispute with the IRS in 2008 over whether I paid my taxes late & in sufficient amount. They kept sending me notices of unpaid tax & interest, but every single letter they send me came after the due date. I finally gave up and paid the amount requested. But I got another penalty letter stating that I still owed some ridiculous amount like $1.32 because I hadn’t paid the last interest penalty on time and so they’d accrued interest on the full amount.
And very conveniently, the penalty letters they send do not have a postal date stamp on the envelope. So no one can prove any of this to the Taxpayer Advocate.
Americans expats are in a big dilemma that requires much pondering.
Renounce and obtain your CLN or live with FACTA — which is coming for sure.
May the force be with you!
Hancock
@John Hancock, “Live with FATCA?” For many it will take more than luck just to be able to survive. Sorry for the pessimism but FATCA for many is life-threatening. Ereteira clubs its overseas citizens only if they go back home for a visit, but the US has conscripted the banks of the world, so far with the compacency of the governments of the countries where they are located, to hunt down and turn in their US citizen account holders. It all reminds me of the freight trains packed with innocent people headed for the gas chambers that awaited them at Auschwitz.
How can the US be protesting the violation of human rights in other countries while it utterly disregards those of its own citizens?
Roger: They do it because they can. They do it because except for Australia, China and Japan, other countries are not standing up with a resounding No. Canada’s Finance Minister has nicely said probably not, but he hasn’t given a resounding no. And Canada’s Human Rights Commission seems to be saying Yes.
They all had the opportunity to say a collective No at last week’s World Economic Forum in Davos. I don’t think it was even mentioned. Instead, Canada’s Prime Minister announced to the whole world (before he told Canadians in Canada!) that his government plans to make changes to Old Age Security.
This should be a world economic issue. If IRS succeeds in his efforts to seize assets around the world, it will have a much greater effect than if Eritrea goes after the assets of its citizens.
Should we perhaps all be pointing this double standard out to our adopted country’s Ambassador to the UN? Mind you, I don’t even know who that is anymore. Sadly, Canada used to have a strong presence there, but not any more. .
The US ambassador to the UN is directly responsible to Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State. I am considering writing letters to her and to the two Senators and the Congressman that represent me in Washington.
How does that saying go? … Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing after they’ve exhausted all other possibilities.
The real answer to their problem is tax reform. They need to get rid of the mortgage interest deduction and broaden their tax base within their own borders. The 50% of Amerians that don’t pay tax now should pay alot for all the years they paid nothing.
Because our population is so small, if you rob every dual citizen in Canada of their life savings it’s like a drop of rain in a swimming pool. It won’t help them much … they should just give it up.
@Roger, I often wonder if recent renunciants will be targetted with fbar fines and onerous audits.
They could specifically hassle renunciants especially anyone still within their statute of limitations for their tax returns and especially FBAR (such as in cases where they might have recently filed delinquent fbars). They will probably accept most pleadings for reasonable csuse but could get their own back by targetting those who’ve renounced. This is why I frear that Petros could be given a very hard time. Hope I’m wrong but my instincts would be to not even consider renouncing if they could hit you with draconian fines.