One of us — not me — asked a great question tonight in Toronto-Danforth of Thomas Mulcair regarding FATCA. The answer: The NDP caucus has not discussed it but we will and then we will have a position. I believe he also said that any US extra-territorial law would be inappropriate or a word to that effect.
Question: Has anyone had a bad experience when entering the US?
Does anyone know of cases where “US persons” at risk from the IRS have run into trouble entering the US? Have any of you had a bad experience?
The last time I entered the US was nearly three years ago and I was seriously hassled at the border crossing (we were driving) because I did not have a US passport. I have not dared try to enter the US since then. I do know a few people who seem to have come and gone without any questions asked.
Thank you.
If clicking on a comment link in the sidebar brings you to the wrong page in the comment stream, click here to go directly to the most recent comment page.
“After Stints Abroad, Re-Entry Can Be Hard”
In 2006, Lisa Lord moved to Heidelberg, Germany, to set up a new talent-management team for software giant SAP AG.
Ms. Lord had been working in the U.S. for the German company for two years and was eager to move up the ranks. But a department reorganization split her duties, and by June 2007 she was back in the U.S. with no clear next position waiting for her at SAP.
Spending a few years overseas can vault ambitious employees into senior leadership positions. But companies aren’t always prepared when those workers return home, veteran expatriates and executive recruiters say. Often, the right domestic jobs aren’t open, or management fails to recognize and reward the skills developed during the time abroad, they say. The resulting frustrations can cause some managers to stumble, and even send some out the door.
Read more at Wall Street Journal
Thomas Mulcair in Toronto-Danforth Tonight
Democracy Day on the Danforth – featuring
special guest NDP Leader Tom Mulcair
Bring your questions and ideas for remaking our democracy.
Starts: September 19th, 2013 – 6:30pm
Ends: September 19th, 2013 – 8:30pm
Where: Auditorium, Eastminster United Church,
310 Danforth Avenue
near Chester TTC Station
Lynne Swanson’s op-ed in Financial Post today: “We are not tax cheats”
Lynne has a superb and very timely article on Financial Post website today.
Dual Canadian-American citizens: We are not tax cheats
Check it out, and please contribute to the comments. You may recognize the sources of a couple of them.
Dual Canadian-American citizens: We are not tax cheats via @LynneBlaze
She has done it again!
Lynne Swanson, Special to Financial Post
Truly a great article that Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty can’t ignore…
Dual Canadian-American citizens: We are not tax cheats
We need Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to insist that Canadian banks follow Canadian laws. We need Minister Flaherty to reassure Canadian citizens and residents that Canadian laws will not be changed for a foreign nation.
Most importantly, we need our elected officials to tell the United States that Canadian laws are made in Ottawa, not in Washington. We must not allow the United States to FATCA Canada.
New York Times on how Foreign Financial Institutions see FATCA
Steve Klaus highlights another piece in today’s New York Times DealB%k – lot’s of mention of FATCA on banks but not on US Persons. Another good one for Brockers to comment on.
New York Times: “Complying With U.S. Tax Evasion Law Is Vexing Foreign Banks”
…But behind the scenes, foreign banks and financial firms are increasingly finding that complying with the law is a major headache.
Treasury Department officials say they are moving apace in getting the world’s banks on board with the law, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. They say they have reached agreements with some large countries, are working on deals with others and are refining parts of the law, which is set to take effect on June 30, 2014.
But some financial institutions, trade groups, scholars and members of Congress have raised an array of concerns, starting with the cost of creating the complex computer systems needed to track Americans’ accounts.
GOP and Dem Senators want to ban Russian Banks from the United States over Syria
From: Senators Call On Treasury Secretary To Sanction Russian Banks That Are Helping Syrian Regime
Here is the full text of the letters of four US Senators:
Dear Secretary Lew:
We write to urge the Department of the Treasury to designate those Russian banks that have helped enable Syria to avoid the effects of sanctions. In our view, these institutions are complicit in prolonging the brutal conflict in Syria and should be barred from the U.S. financial system.
According to numerous reports, banks such as VTB, Vneshekonombank, and Gazprombank are carrying on “business as usual” with Syria, and have repeatedly undermined American, European Union, and United Nations sanctions. Such activities have reportedly included Venesekonombank’s facilitating Syrian payments for S-300 missile batteries, VTB’s holding President Assad’s personal funds, and Gazprombank’s making payments for crude oil.
Russian bank support violates international sanctions by enabling Syria to pay for imports and receive funds for exports. This assistance eases much of the financial burden on the Assad regime, allowing it to continue military purchases and pay the soldiers that sustain the war in Syria.
Most of the international community has banded together in the face of Assad’s cruel war to isolate his regime. The financial lifeline offered by Russia’s state-owned banks undermines Executive Orders 13582, 13573, and 13608. We urge the Office of Foreign Assets Control to vigorously pursue all violations of the U.S. sanctions regime, designating any and all Russian individuals and entities found to be in non-compliance.
We write to you mindful that there is clear and compelling evidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons to brutally murder over 1000 Syrians, including hundreds of children. It is now more critical than ever that you swiftly designate those financial institutions that have profited from violating sanctions to prop up the Syrian regime.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent issue.
Sincerely,
Kelly Ayotte, United States Senator
Richard Blumenthal, United States Senator
John Cornyn, United States Senator
Jeanne Shaheen, United States Senator
Live Q & A with Justin Trudeau This Afternoon
Wish I’d seen this sooner but Justin Trudeau is answering questions live this afternoon at 4 pm edt. You can log in and ask a question. Maybe about FATCA progress or what the government response might be in banks in Canada start shunning Canadians with dual US citizenship. Or anything else really.
#FATCA: A Tool of the Electronic Surveillance State
This is a repost of James George Jatras for RepealFATCA.com . It is a recent distribution email sent to the various media sources, was posted on his web site and has been mentioned in various IBS threads. It is pulled out here for greater visibility. Please circulate.
September 16, 2013
Washington, DC
Financial Data Provided to ‘Intel’ Agencies Considered ‘Not Inherently Confidential’ under U.S. Law
Those familiar with the U.S. “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” (FATCA) – and in the United States, that’s not many people – think of it as either ….
1. A sledgehammer attempt to curb “offshore tax evasion” or (more accurately) as
2. A costly, counterproductive, and indiscriminate burden on the global economic system;
3. A compliance nightmare that only benefits tax lawyers, accountants, and software firms;
4. A job-killing disincentive for foreign investment in the United States;
5. A crude extraterritorial overreach in violation of every principle of sovereign legality;
6. An abuse of the U.S. Senate’s constitutional treaty authority;
7. A blatant violation of WTO and other trade commitments; and
8. A financial “drone strike” against Americans living abroad.
FATCA is all that and much, MUCH more. Continue reading