Liberty and justice for all United States persons abroad

The Isaac Brock Society

Monthly Archives: March 2026

April 1, 2026 – The Supreme Court Will Hear The Trump Administration Argument’s For Restricting Birthright Citizenship

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad 5 Comments

Prologue

Interesting article and even more interesting comments on the 14th Amendment "birthright citizenship" issue.The Trump v. Barbara case to be heard April 1, 2026 will probe which individuals born in the USA are not U.S. citizens at birth.www.nytimes.com/2026/03/30/u…

— John Richardson (@expatriationlaw.bsky.social) 2026-03-31T09:07:48.861Z

 

On Wednesday April 1, 2026 the Supreme Court of the United States will hear the “Trump v. Barbara” case. This issue is whether birth on U.S. soil is sufficient to confer U.S. citizenship regardless of the legal status of the parents. An excellent analysis of what to expect is here.

You can listen to the live argument on the Supreme Court site. It all takes place on Wednesday April 1, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time.

This case will be of particular interest to the “Accidental Americans” community who do not believe that they should be treated as though they are U.S. citizens. President Trump may agree with them. Specifically, you can expect the Trump lawyers to argue  – as per his January 20, 2025 Executive Order that:

Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship/

In Summary, it appears that the Trump administration will argue that “birthright citizenship” is not available to children born on U.S. soil to a mother who is neither a U.S. citizen nor permanent resident AND when the father is neither a U.S. citizen nor permanent resident.

My prediction (which is worth nothing)

The “Birth Tourism” industry will continue ONLY to the extent that the biological father of the child is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident. Yes, there are some circumstances where U.S. citizenship or Green Card status is a benefit! Male Americans abroad can become “registered sperm donors”. (Perhaps a side business to offset the costs of U.S. tax compliance abroad.)

If you are interested in a more detailed discussion (on the law and not the business opportunity for male U.S. citizens)  see my lengthier post …

 

Trump v. Barbara – Ending The “Birth Tourism” Presumption That Birth On U.S. Soil Is A Sufficient Condition For U.S. Citizenship

John Richardson

 

 

 

 

Some Americans Considering A Move To Canada May Already Be Canadian Citizens

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad Leave a comment

 

I just got off a call with a Canadian resident who wishes to renounce his U.S. citizenship. He is NOT a naturalized Canadian citizen. Rather he was born in the United States (making him a U.S. citizen) to a Canadian citizen father (making him a Canadian citizen). The benefits of “dual citizenship from birth” means that he will be able to avoid “covered expatriate” status (no 877A exit tax payable).

During the conversation it became apparent that he has a son who born in the United States and has always lived in the United States (about 25 years old).

Amazingly, due to a change in Canada’s citizenship laws that took effect on December 15, 2025:

1. The son (born before December 15, 2025)  IS a Canadian citizen!! All that is necessary is that the facts be proven to support that claim to citizenship.

2. Children born after December 15, 2025 to a “born abroad” Canadian citizen are Canadian citizens if the Canadian citizen parent has 1095 days  of Canadian presence prior to the birth of the child. (Do you think it might be a good idea to acquire that presence by attending university in Canada?)

Great news for a lot of people!

A “watered down” description of this is available here on the Government of Canada site.

I suspect that this change in Canada’s citizenship laws is a “gift” to many U.S. citizens. Think of it!

Many U.S. citizens (and of course citizens of many other countries) will have the right to be recognized as Canadian citizens. For those who don’t want Canadian citizenship, there is even a simplified procedure to renounce Canadian citizenship. Interestingly the cost to renounce Canadian citizenship is $100 CDN.

Further information is available here.

In a world where people are paying huge amounts of money for a second citizenship this is a bargain!

 

John Richardson

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Citizenship Taxation Violates International Law

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad 1 Comment

Meeting Ellen Timmer

Ellen Timmer is a Dutch based lawyer who has been and continues to be very active in the opposition to FATCA and U.S. citizenship taxation. Included in the long list of her accomplishment is that she represented retired KLM Pilot (and “Accidental American) Ronald Aries.  Mr. Aries had to fight to retain a bank account in the Netherlands (which is his country of residence). See the podcasts below …

About FATCA and U.S. Citizenship Taxation

Of course, FATCA is simply a consequence of U.S. citizenship taxation. The practical meaning and reality of “citizenship taxation” is that it is simply the United States claiming people who live in other countries and taxed as residents of those countries should be treated as though they also live in the United States.

U.S. citizenship taxation is taxation based on the “circumstances of birth” and NOT on “the circumstances of life”.

This ridiculous notion is reinforced by both the “saving clause” in U.S. tax treaties and the FATCA IGAs.

An Attack On The Sovereignty Of Other Countries

I continue to believe that U.S. citizenship taxation is a violation of international law. I was very pleased to see that Ellen Timmer included my argument in 2025 post on her site.

The post is here:

US Citizenship Taxation Violates International Law | CBT, FATCA

 

Appendix – Meeting Retired KLM Pilot Ronald Aries

For those interested in meeting retired KLM Pilot Ronald Aries, here are two podcasts I did with him Helen Burggraf’s American Expat Finance News Journal.

Podcast 1

Podcast 2

 

John Richardson

 

 

 

 

 

Effective April 13, 2026 The Fee For A “Certificate Of Loss Of Nationality Will Be Reduced To $450

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad 3 Comments

Part A – The Good news!! – The Fee For A CLN Is Lower

I noted in my post of March 5, 2026 that the reduction in fees for a Certificate of Loss of Nationality was in the final regulatory stage.

The fee reduction for a CLN  from $2350 to $450 USD will  be in effect on April 13, 2026.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/13/2026-04931/schedule-of-fees-for-consular-services-fee-for-administrative-processing-of-request-for-certificate

(As reviewed in the Appendix to this post, the delay in the fee reduction had been extensively discussed in my January 4, 2026 post.)

A “Certificate of Loss Of Nationality” will be less expensive and therefore more available

On March 13, 2026 the State Department published in the Federal Register a “Final Rule” which:

… adjusts the Schedule of Fees for Consular Services by reducing the fee for Administrative Processing of Request for Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States from $2,350 to $450.

This “Final Rule” is to take effect 30 days from the date of publication. This  means that the renunciation fee will be $450 effective April 13, 2026.

The fee reduction is NOT retroactive

The Notice is clear that the fee reduction is prospective and NOT retroactive.

To learn more …

Here is the pdf to the State Department announcement of the fee reduction for a CLN from $2350 to $450.

2026-04931

Commentary on X …

 

Continue reading →

Taxpayer Advocate To IRS: Your Task Is To Administer A Worldwide Tax System. Do it!

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad Leave a comment

On February 23, 2026 SEAT President Dr. Laura Snyder published an excellent article in Tax Notes.  The article discussed  the recent Taxpayer Advocate report which was sympathetic to the tax situation of Americans abroad. (I previously posted on the 2025 Taxpayer Advocate Report noting that: The IRS Has An Obligation To Meet Taxpayers Where They Are, But Is Not Doing So For Americans Abroad.)

Dr. Snyder expands the discussion …

The article examines the National Taxpayer Advocate’s 2025 Annual Report to Congress, which spotlights the difficulties faced by overseas taxpayers as one of the most serious problems of U.S. tax administration. The IRS’s failure to administer a worldwide tax system raises constitutional issues and has serious repercussions not only for overseas Americans but also for the tax system as a whole.

Her article is available here:

Taxpayer Advocate to IRS: Your Task Is to Administer a Worldwide Tax System. Do It.

 

John Richardson

 

AARO White Paper Explains Why The Voting Rights Of Americans Abroad Are Under Attack

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad 1 Comment

Question –  what truly defines an American voter?


Answer – an American voter is a U.S citizen who does NOT have a constitutional right to vote.

 

_______________________________________________________

Lobbying for a statutory right to vote …

AARO (Association of Americans Resident Overseas) is a Paris based organization with a long history of lobbying for and protecting the voting rights of Americans abroad. A previous post on Brock detailed AARO’s efforts in 1975 to secure voting rights for Americans abroad.

The above video is based on the following research published by AARO in 2026.

Direct link to AARO paper

Click to access STATE_OF_PLAY_2026_FEB_16_FINAL.pdf

The problem in a nutshell …

The reality is that not all Americans abroad have ever had the opportunity to vote. In fact, in the last election, Americans abroad in 13 states were not eligible to vote.

The current administration is proposing various new laws that make  it more difficult to vote for two reasons:

1. Proof of citizenship: This is much ore difficult for Americans abroad. Would you want to send a copy of your passport to the USA?

2. Some Americans abroad being forced to vote in DC. There are no representatives of DC in Congress.

At a minimum for Americans abroad this means:

“Taxation without representation!”

 

A longer post on this topic is available on my Citizenship Solutions site:

AARO White Paper Explains Why The Voting Rights Of Americans Abroad Are Under Attack

Warning!! Voting in a U.S. election after the commission of an expatriating act will make it impossible to argue for a CLN based on a past relinquishment.

 

John Richardson

 

 

 

 

All Roads Lead To Renunciation AND The Reduction Of The Fee To Issue A “CLN”

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad 1 Comment

My January 4, 2026 post titled “Americans Abroad Aren’t Renouncing Because They Want To – They Are Renouncing Because They Have To” included a discussion of the State Department’s promise to reduce the fee to issue a CLN from $2350 to $450.

Americans Abroad Aren’t Renouncing Because They Want To. They Are Renouncing Because They Have To!

Today, I am pleased to report that “All Roads Lead To A Reduction In The Fee To Issue A CLN”.

Q. How much longer will it take?

A. I don’t know. But, I do note that the United States was able to put a man on the moon in ten years. Clearly, the reduction of the renunciation fee is a project of equal complexity.

The following link reveals that the fee reduction appears to have been approved on February 25, 2026.

 

 

John Richardson

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bruyea Case Argued – March 3, 2026 at 10 am Eastern – Here Are The Recordings

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad Leave a comment

In a post published on January 11, 2026 I discussed the problem of the United States attempt to deny U.S. citizens in Canada a foreign tax credit for Canadian tax paid on Canadian investment income. The post is here:

Does The Canada U.S. Tax Treaty Allow A Foreign Tax Credit Against The Net Investment Income Tax?

I mentioned that a U.S. court had ruled in “Bruyea” that the United States was obligated – as per the terms of the treaty – to allow a tax credit against U.S. tax for Canadian tax paid on that same income. Obviously, this decision was a threat to what the U.S. regards as it s right to impose double taxation on Americans abroad generally and on U.S. citizens living in Canada specifically.

The Bruyea is an incredibly significant case for both individuals living under the sanction of U.S. citizenship taxation and the countries where those U.S. citizens live.

The case was argued today March 3, 2026.

Here are the recordings of the oral arguments. Very interesting!

____________________________________________________

 

Here is a podcast based on a March 4, 2026 X Spaces discussion about the cases that I had with Tim Smyth.

 

 

John Richardson

 

 

 

Does Renunciation Of U.S. Citizenship Or Green Card Abandonment Affect U.S. Social Security Benefits?

Posted on by Posted in Issues regarding US persons abroad 2 Comments

 

Entitlement to U.S. Social Security (including spousal and survivor benefits) after expatriation has always been a difficult. During the months of January and February 2026 U.S. tax lawyer Virginia La Torre Jeker – in a series of three posts – did a “deep dive” into how expatriation impacts entitlement to Social Security benefits and the way they are taxed. The posts are available here, here and here.

Expatriation (renouncing U.S. citizenship or Green Card abandonment), affects U.S. Social Security in at least two distinct ways:

– the transition from “U.S. Person” to a nonresident alien means that (from a purely U.S. perspective) U.S. Social Security will be taxed differently. The difference from the U.S. perspective may be modified (example Canada) by tax treaties

– your citizenship (as distinct from your residence) after expatriation matters. Citizens of some countries may be required to return to the United States every six months to continue to receive their benefits.

Therefore, the impact of expatriation on the taxation and access to U.S. Social Security must be understood prior to expatriation.

Spoiler alert: Expatriation will NOT impact the capacity to receive Social Security benefits for citizens found on “List 1” (discussed in Virginia’s first blog post). This includes citizens of Canada, the U.K., etc. …

Please note that the neither the podcast nor Virginia’s post discuss the question of Social Security spousal or survivor benefits. We will leave that to another day.

 

 

John Richardson