http://drtp.ca/canada-fatca-court-challenge-fizzling-maybe/
“[77] For all these reasons, the declaratory and injunctive relief requested by the plaintiffs in their motion for summary judgment shall be denied by the Court, without prejudice to the plaintiffs’ right to pursue their claim that the impugned provisions are ultra vires or inoperative because they are unconstitutional or otherwise unjustifiably infringe Charterrights. There shall be no costs. This is a case where, in view of the nature of the issues and the public interest involved in clarifying the scope of novel provisions affecting hundreds of thousands of Canadian citizens, no costs should be ordered against the losing parties.”
This last sentence leads us to believe that the case may be heard in the Supreme Court of Canada at a later date.
Hillis v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 FC 1082