Liberty and justice for all United States persons abroad

#FATCA Came Last to EU, but Mandatory Fingerprinting was First

Yes, with FATCA, my government has forced itself deep into my most private financial affairs. Little had I realized, that the government had also forced previously itself deep into the smallest crevasses of my fingers.

My Government Demands my Fingerprints: #FATCA isn’t the first American Imperialist Intrusion into #EU and other countries

So, what happened was that I innocently went down to get my EU passport renewed. This is not a place where I expect conflict. But it turns out that they fingerprinted me as if it was just part of the process.

What process?

Well, it turns out that my country required fingerprints on passports as of 2012.

Formally adopted by the Council of the European Union(EU) in December of 2004, the Biometric Passports Regulation prescribes the compulsory biometric “enrollment” of all EU citizens applying for a new passport or passport renewal. Member States fully participating in the Schengen regime and Schengen-affiliated third countries like Norway are obliged to include two biometric identifiers into their citiz ens’ passports by the end of June 2009. Schengen-made “ e- Passports” will contain a chip storing a facial scan of the passport holder and two of his or her fingerprints.

But why the hull did EU require fingerprints in their passports?

The same article states the U.S. Visa Waiver Program. Following legislative amendments in 2002, this program required the inclusion of biometric identifiers into selected countries’ passports by October 26, 2004 in order to allow for the continuation of visa-free travel to the United States.”

And then, yes, EU did it:“As it is not possible for legal reasons to harmonise the passport format, the Commission has set out with Regulation (EC) 2252/2004 common security standards including biometric identifiers.” “The Commission adopted on 28 February 2005 the first part of the technical specifications which relate to the storage of the facial image of the holder on a contactless chip in the passport. The protection of this image is ensured by “Basic Access Control” which needs the reading of the machine readable zone in the passport for opening the chip. This Commission decision triggered the implementation time frame so that all Member States have to implement the facial image requirement at the latest on 28th August 2006. As a consequence all Member States will also fulfil the US requirements for the Visa Waiver countries to issue biometrically enabled passports by October 2006. “

For the lesser-polite version, read here

https://bancdelasteroideb612.wordpress.com/2016/09/29/biometrics-train-with-a-fatca-caboose/

 

 

4 thoughts on “#FATCA Came Last to EU, but Mandatory Fingerprinting was First

  1. Soon we’ll probably need to submit biometric data in order to open (or keep) bank accounts, vote, receive medical services, and, and, and. Unfortunately, it’s the way of the world.

    Most people under the age of 30 have been trained from day one to share every aspect of their lives via social media, so none of them have any sense of what privacy means or why it’s something precious. Some schools even use pupils’ biometric data for cashless catering, libraries, payment systems, registration and locker systems

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biometrics_in_schools

    George Orwell’s 1984 should be read as a cautionary tale, but most governments seem to be using the book as an instruction manual, using the latest and greatest technology at their disposal.

  2. On 6 October 2016 I entered the Dominican Republic at Aeropuerto Internacional Las Americas (AILA) and got fingerprinted at immigration. I also reported an unlocked door I encountered, which led to a waiting room. Somebody could bypass immigration that way, which is an opportunity for human traffickers, I noted.

    Actually, fingerprint and ID number is merely a more accurate extention of photo and name. Many persons have the same name but different ID numbers, and they may have similar faces but different fingerprints. Things would be quite different if everybody had to have a different name.

  3. Congressman Jason Chaffetz finds out FBI illegally uses facial recognition software.

    From 4:00… he talks about fingerprints and DNS samples ante-facto (he seems to be against).

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *