Liberty and justice for all United States persons abroad

Notice of Meeting of Standing Committee on Finance #34 Tuesday May 13

HOUSE OF COMMONS
2nd Session, 41st Parliament

NOTICE OF MEETING

Standing Committee on Finance

Meeting No. 34
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.

(613-947-7776)

Orders of the Day

Televised

Bill C-31, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 11, 2014 and other measures

Witnesses

3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

As an individual

Allison Christians, Professor
H. Heward Stikeman Chair in Tax Law, McGill University

Credit Union Central of Canada

Marc-André Pigeon, Director
Financial Sector Policy

Moodys Gartner Tax Law LLP

Roy Berg, Director
US Tax Law

Videoconference – Toronto, Ontario

Investment Industry Association of Canada

Ian Russell, President and Chief Executive Officer

5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.

As an individual

Arthur Cockfield, Professor
Faculty of Law, Queen’s University

Portfolio Management Association of Canada

Katie Walmsley, President

As an individual

Lynne Swanson

Videoconference – New York, New York

As an individual

Max Reed, Attorney
White and Case LLP

I am posting this apart from the cross-post from Sandbox so more people will see it. In addition to Lynne, some familiar faces, Allison, Roy Berg and Arthur Cockfield. It will be televised. Does anyone know how to record this?

110 thoughts on “Notice of Meeting of Standing Committee on Finance #34 Tuesday May 13

  1. Over at Victoria’s wonderful Franco-American Flophouse blog http://thefranco-americanflophouse.blogspot.ca/2014/05/about-those-renunciations.html , commenter Christophe https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2424131704277823220&postID=7087350561935963429 drew attention to this article at Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fredericlefebvre/facta-a-reminder-of-the-s_b_5275449.html

    ‘FATCA: A Reminder of the Social Role of French Banks’
    Posted: 05/06/2014 3:23 pm EDT
    by Frédéric Lefebvre
    Representative of the first district of French citizens living abroad, former minister

    I pull this quote from it:
    “……To accept FATCA is tantamount to accepting the American principle of taxation based on nationality instead of taxation based on residence as it is the case in the rest of the world…..”

    What about that statement is not understood by the Harper government in Canada? What about that system could they possibly find acceptable to subject the citizens and residents in their care to, much less to ‘respect’ it?

  2. @WhiteKat
    I only saw about the last 5 mins.She strongly made the point that the IGA is not legitimate. The gentleman from the CUC spoke very briefly (I am trying to do work for my evening class). I did not appreciate Mr. Berg’s comments. The usual, “life under the IGA is better than withoiut it and so on………..” He introduced his remarks with the comment that no one likely had more experience with all this than he did., GRRRRRRRR

  3. @ Furious AC
    This is the questioning period and thank goodness Mr. Rankin is giving Prof. Christians more time than her original 5 minute presentation.Great questions!

  4. Allison is responding very strongly to Murray Rankin’s excellent questions.

  5. Ugh Saxton’s question to CU gentleman leads to CU’s saying they are happy with the exemption of 60% of their member credit unions,

  6. Scott Brison addresses the issue that CDN gov contributions to tax-deferred accounts amount to being taxed by the IRS. He GETS IT! And makes the point the ‘exemption” regarding tax-deferred accounts really applies only to the FFIs. Concerns that RESPs and RDSPs will be reported as they were not exempted by the IGA. Asking Berg: What is preventing private trusts and holding companies from being FFI’s? If entities have US connections, there will be holding even though a non-financial institution in Canada. The agent will be required to withhold according to US law. This will be a problem down the road for Canada.

  7. Scott Bryson made some excellent points. I hope this video will still be available after the hearing is over.

  8. @Tricia/ nobledreamer

    Berg stands to make alot of money on this… if I was going to hit the legal lottery… I would be persuasive and tilt it my way of thinking if I can

  9. Allison really made the point that the Revenue Rule is law in both countries (Canada & US) and that the ITA section 241 sets out stringent conditions on the exchange of confidential taxpayer information. She rocks!

  10. I hope the Karma gods are unkind to Mr. Berg. Grrrrrrrrr

    Allison is no shrinking violet. Love her!

  11. Lynne is awesome. I’m so proud of her. We ALL are. She is introducing the amendment suggestion. Bravo!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *